collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

MOTD by VillaTim
[Today at 10:49:52 PM]


Douglas Luiz - Confirmed confirmed by Somniloquism
[Today at 10:47:16 PM]


Aston Villa 2 Chelsea 2 Post Match Heart Massage. by Goldenballs
[Today at 10:40:52 PM]


Champions League Contention by markeeeebeeee2005
[Today at 10:39:43 PM]


Summer 2024 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by PeterWithe
[Today at 10:38:05 PM]


Loanwatch 2023/24 by Ian.
[Today at 10:37:56 PM]


Robin Olsen by VillaTim
[Today at 10:31:27 PM]


Other Games - 2023/24 by PeterWithesShin
[Today at 10:17:13 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?  (Read 15533 times)

Offline TimTheVillain

  • Member
  • Posts: 4447
  • Location: Location
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #30 on: January 19, 2012, 09:18:57 AM »
Carlos Cuellar - Why ?
Add it to the previous questions of Luke Young - Why ? or Gary Cahill - Why ?
Gary wanted 1st team football. MO'N had just bought in experienced centre backs in Dunne and Collins so his chances were limited.
Knight and Davies

Definitive ( as usual).

Online Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35684
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 08.01.2025
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #31 on: January 19, 2012, 09:24:20 AM »
We also had Laursen and Mellberg at the time.

Offline Astral Weeks

  • Member
  • Posts: 2831
  • Age: 70
  • Location: Everywhere and nowhere, Baby.
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #32 on: January 19, 2012, 09:35:40 AM »
We also had Laursen and Mellberg at the time.

Blimey, those were the days.

Online Tokyo Sexwhale

  • Member
  • Posts: 3254
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #33 on: January 19, 2012, 09:46:14 AM »
Cahill would have learned a lot from Laursen.  Instead we wasted the best part of £13-£14m on Davies and Knight.  And there's the money we had to spend to replace Davies and Knight...

Christ, how we pissed away the best opportunity to make an impression we may ever have in my lifetime.

Offline Concrete John

  • Member
  • Posts: 15175
  • Location: Flying blind on a rocket cycle
  • GM : Mar, 2014
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #34 on: January 19, 2012, 09:50:33 AM »
The Bolton Defender wasn't ready for regular 1st team football in a top 6 side when he left.  Laursen and Davies were doing great for us at that time, but when Laursen got injured Cuellar and Davies didn't click as a partnership.  That could have been his chance to establish himself at Villa, but he didn't want to wait.   

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 9666
  • Location: Peckham
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #35 on: January 19, 2012, 10:01:36 AM »
There's got to be a reason why none of O'Neill, McDonald, Houllier or McLeish has given Cuellar a run at centre back....

Offline DB

  • Member
  • Posts: 4965
  • Location: Absolute zero
  • GM : 11.01.2021
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #36 on: January 19, 2012, 10:47:05 AM »
He is injury prone, but given a run at CB (which he never really has had), he'll be improvement on Collins  - IMO he's a much better player. His stint at full-back never really did him justice.

That said, if only we could find another gem like Laursen....

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 39119
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #37 on: January 19, 2012, 11:23:59 AM »
I'd have him ahead of both Collins and Hutton.
He may not be the greatest passer in the world but he most certainly knows how to defend.

Offline nigel

  • Member
  • Posts: 5388
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #38 on: January 19, 2012, 11:48:13 AM »
Carlos Cuellar - Why ?
Add it to the previous questions of Luke Young - Why ? or Gary Cahill - Why ?
Gary wanted 1st team football. MO'N had just bought in experienced centre backs in Dunne and Collins so his chances were limited.
Knight and Davies
Blimey, I forgot about those.

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 9666
  • Location: Peckham
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #39 on: January 19, 2012, 11:54:36 AM »
That's the £15mil combination of Knmight & Davies.

Offline darren woolley

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 34238
  • Location: London
  • GM : 12.12.2024
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #40 on: January 19, 2012, 12:01:16 PM »
I would have Cuellar in the team instead of Collins he would do a better job for us than Collins.

Online Dave

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 42055
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 04.01.2024
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #41 on: January 19, 2012, 12:10:40 PM »
Instead we wasted the best part of £13-£14m on Davies and Knight.
We didn't waste any money on Knight. We got a good bit of service out of him and then made a profit on him.

Offline CJ

  • Member
  • Posts: 7888
  • Age: 70
  • Location: Downtown Cookley
  • GM : 12.07.2017
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #42 on: January 19, 2012, 12:16:02 PM »
Instead we wasted the best part of £13-£14m on Davies and Knight.
We didn't waste any money on Knight. We got a good bit of service out of him and then made a profit on him.

True - a small profit on Knight. God knows how much we lost on Davies though - was the fee from Bloose ever disclosed?

Online Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58347
  • Age: 53
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #43 on: January 19, 2012, 12:16:18 PM »
Didn't he get the well deserved last-minute equaliser in the 2-2 draw with Arsenal at VP a few seasons ago?

Online Dave

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 42055
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 04.01.2024
Re: Cuellar-Why are we not keeping him?
« Reply #44 on: January 19, 2012, 12:38:17 PM »
Yup

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal