It's a distortion of statistics, the overall number of people out of work does not tell the whole story as it varies greatly from region to region and sector to sector. People are being made redundant directly by this government and indirectly as a result of their policies. That's a fact.
Quote from: Chris Smith on September 30, 2011, 01:55:23 PMIt's a distortion of statistics, the overall number of people out of work does not tell the whole story as it varies greatly from region to region and sector to sector. People are being made redundant directly by this government and indirectly as a result of their policies. That's a fact.Another way of looking at it is to say that during the course of this government just as many jobs have been created as have been lost.And if it varies from sector to sector then that's just the way it is unfortunately. Times change and we have to move with them. I assume that you believe we should still be manufacturing codpieces, thatched rooves and penny farthings?!
They are jobs out there, dont believe the story the economy on its arse, its tough I should know I been made redundant twice in a career as an accountant in last 12 months but found work immediately because I network like nuts, social media now the way to find a job and secondly be flexible.I worked in London for four weeks whilst I found a new role near home, its hard and no guarantee but it can be done.The economy is growing in areas like technical manufacturing, cloud computing, renewable energy.To be honest public sector needed trimming for years, regardless of political view it went too far
Quote from: Ad@m on September 30, 2011, 06:09:03 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on September 30, 2011, 01:55:23 PMIt's a distortion of statistics, the overall number of people out of work does not tell the whole story as it varies greatly from region to region and sector to sector. People are being made redundant directly by this government and indirectly as a result of their policies. That's a fact.Another way of looking at it is to say that during the course of this government just as many jobs have been created as have been lost.And if it varies from sector to sector then that's just the way it is unfortunately. Times change and we have to move with them. I assume that you believe we should still be manufacturing codpieces, thatched rooves and penny farthings?!No, but building cars, for example, would be good rather than relying on the corrupt and discredited financial sector. Just saying "that's the way it is" is pathetic. For the last 25 years or so this country has been the victim of a bizarre neo liberal experiment that has left us with an economy where large parts of the country, the old industrial heartlands, have been neglected and unemployment is endemic while other parts are relatively prosperous. This isn't a party political point, it started under Thatcher but Blair was happy to carry it on, but it's the reason that Germany has coped with the recession far better than we have. When the history of this period us studied in 50 years time they'll think we were barking mad.
Chris government intervention or lack of it did not cause Rover to collapse , it was basically a badly run company that was going to fail.The only economy will fully recover is new investment in new markets and people having balls to start new businesses.
Quote from: richardhubbard on September 30, 2011, 06:54:49 PMChris government intervention or lack of it did not cause Rover to collapse , it was basically a badly run company that was going to fail.The only economy will fully recover is new investment in new markets and people having balls to start new businesses.The Governmet gave billions to prop up badly run banks, why couldn't they do the same for Rover?You really dont have a clue about business do you, they did that in 60's and 70's called BL and it was a fucking disaster