Quote from: Chris Smith on September 30, 2011, 07:06:11 PMQuote from: richardhubbard on September 30, 2011, 06:54:49 PMChris government intervention or lack of it did not cause Rover to collapse , it was basically a badly run company that was going to fail.The only economy will fully recover is new investment in new markets and people having balls to start new businesses.The Governmet gave billions to prop up badly run banks, why couldn't they do the same for Rover?You really dont have a clue about business do you, they did that in 60's and 70's called BL and it was a fucking disaster
Quote from: richardhubbard on September 30, 2011, 06:54:49 PMChris government intervention or lack of it did not cause Rover to collapse , it was basically a badly run company that was going to fail.The only economy will fully recover is new investment in new markets and people having balls to start new businesses.The Governmet gave billions to prop up badly run banks, why couldn't they do the same for Rover?You really dont have a clue about business do you, they did that in 60's and 70's called BL and it was a fucking disaster
Chris government intervention or lack of it did not cause Rover to collapse , it was basically a badly run company that was going to fail.The only economy will fully recover is new investment in new markets and people having balls to start new businesses.
dont believe the story the economy on its arse
Quote from: richardhubbard on September 30, 2011, 07:09:49 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on September 30, 2011, 07:06:11 PMQuote from: richardhubbard on September 30, 2011, 06:54:49 PMChris government intervention or lack of it did not cause Rover to collapse , it was basically a badly run company that was going to fail.The only economy will fully recover is new investment in new markets and people having balls to start new businesses.The Governmet gave billions to prop up badly run banks, why couldn't they do the same for Rover?You really dont have a clue about business do you, they did that in 60's and 70's called BL and it was a fucking disasterThat's not an answer to the question I posed though. If we can help one ailing business why not another? Rover was badly run but that doesn't mean it had to be stay that way. We can build Fords, Nissans, BMWs etc so the argument that we just can't do it doesn't hold water. I understand why we had to support the banks but not why we couldn't do the same for a business that was so important to this city.
I worked for Moben kitchens who collapsed two months ago, 75% within a 8 weeks now have jobs so roles are out there , even in grim north
Longbridge would be flying now if BMW hadn't stitched them up by moving Mini production away from it's home to Cowley. Not very good at making cars? Jag, Land and Range Rover, Mini, Rolls Royce, Morgan and Aston Martin owners would beg to differ I'm sure.
Quote from: richardhubbard on September 30, 2011, 07:08:38 PM I worked for Moben kitchens who collapsed two months ago, 75% within a 8 weeks now have jobs so roles are out there , even in grim northSo 25%, a quarter of the workforce, are still out of work?That doesn't sound that great to me.
Quote from: Chris Smith on September 30, 2011, 07:23:26 PMQuote from: richardhubbard on September 30, 2011, 07:09:49 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on September 30, 2011, 07:06:11 PMQuote from: richardhubbard on September 30, 2011, 06:54:49 PMChris government intervention or lack of it did not cause Rover to collapse , it was basically a badly run company that was going to fail.The only economy will fully recover is new investment in new markets and people having balls to start new businesses.The Governmet gave billions to prop up badly run banks, why couldn't they do the same for Rover?You really dont have a clue about business do you, they did that in 60's and 70's called BL and it was a fucking disasterThat's not an answer to the question I posed though. If we can help one ailing business why not another? Rover was badly run but that doesn't mean it had to be stay that way. We can build Fords, Nissans, BMWs etc so the argument that we just can't do it doesn't hold water. I understand why we had to support the banks but not why we couldn't do the same for a business that was so important to this city.Because the place was run by the unions and inept management, so if you have a crap product useless management and a militant work force, who the fuck invests in that, thankfully even the government did not want to eventually. You would not need a very big room to house the people that destroyed the banks, lots of people that worked for or are working for banks lose thier jobs because of the idiotic decisions of the few. Back to the car industry, so even when management wanted to introduce a new model , change working paterns, develop the ideas, they had to negotiate every single change with the Unions.