Go Down
-
Yep. According to the BBC stats, over 600 of Barry's matches has been as a starter which is some going, especially if you think most of those 32 would have been when he was younger. Milner runs at only just over 400 as a starter.
-
Some Brighton fans feel he's being given sub appearances purely to get the record and that he's not PL standard any more.
-
Some Brighton fans feel he's being given sub appearances purely to get the record and that he's not PL standard any more.
I was talking to one the other night and she said that twice he has been bought on as a late sub and it has cost them. -
He came on as late sub but not sure how HE specifically cost them. Everton goal was a weak Dunk clearing header and the late Fulham goal was a direct freekick given away by someone else I believe. (Assuming that was the two matches being reffered to).
-
Not a player, but a manager.
Hearing about the Jeremy (Full Metal) Jacquet transfer from Rennes to Liverpool, I discovered that the Rennes manager is...
Sunday, Monday
HABIB BEYE!
-
Re Milner, some hillarious social media outrage about his dastardly way of beating Gareth Barry's record.
-
Barry or Milner, the better player? Barry for me
-
Yeah, Barry.
-
Gaz Baz.
-
Barry.
-
Gazza Bazza; and never seemed to get injured.
-
Or his shorts dirty.
-
Barry was without a doubt the more gifted footballer, but 2009-10 Milner was almost the complete midfielder.
In terms of value to us, I'm going to buck the trend and say Milner. -
Both were terrific players for us, for different reasons.
I vote for Barry for often being the best player in a struggling side, as well as being the best 17-year-old I've ever seen.
I also vote for the 2009/10 Milner who was so dynamic in the centre of midfield that he allowed us to get away with playing 4-4-2. -
Milner didn't play the weekend so he can only level with the record if he comes on for us.