Quote from: pauliebentnuts on May 09, 2011, 10:53:17 PMQuote from: Villadawg on May 09, 2011, 10:52:12 PMQuote from: pauliebentnuts on May 09, 2011, 10:45:26 PMIt is the names that linger the longest which are the more significant.On the day he left, that list would have been chucked together by some trader with a page to fill. As time passed, the prices would have started to follow the money.That market had been running for some time.You just said it was the day O'Neill left.That is not some time, and that market would have taken bugger all money at that point. If you mean the market was running before he left, then that's of pretty much zero import anyway, as his departure would have meant the market starting afresh in any caseNo it wouldn't. Lots of bookies run markets on the next permanent manager of football clubs. We've had one running for months. Moyes is evens at the moment.
Quote from: Villadawg on May 09, 2011, 10:52:12 PMQuote from: pauliebentnuts on May 09, 2011, 10:45:26 PMIt is the names that linger the longest which are the more significant.On the day he left, that list would have been chucked together by some trader with a page to fill. As time passed, the prices would have started to follow the money.That market had been running for some time.You just said it was the day O'Neill left.That is not some time, and that market would have taken bugger all money at that point. If you mean the market was running before he left, then that's of pretty much zero import anyway, as his departure would have meant the market starting afresh in any case
Quote from: pauliebentnuts on May 09, 2011, 10:45:26 PMIt is the names that linger the longest which are the more significant.On the day he left, that list would have been chucked together by some trader with a page to fill. As time passed, the prices would have started to follow the money.That market had been running for some time.
It is the names that linger the longest which are the more significant.On the day he left, that list would have been chucked together by some trader with a page to fill. As time passed, the prices would have started to follow the money.
Current USA coach Bob Bradley is the favourite to take over at Villa Park and is trading at 4.0 whilst the perennial candidate on any next manager market, Sven Goran Eriksson, is 9.2. Former Spurs and Germany star Jurgen Klinsmann, who was in charge of his national team at the 2006 World Cup, trades at 9.6. Former Middlesbrough player and manager Gareth Southgate, who enjoyed a lengthy spell at Villa Park as a player, is currentlly available at 12.5.
Anyone who thinks the managers with jobs like Moyes would have jumped ship to take over us a week into the season are mental frankly. You'd have to be a complete bastard to do that to your club.
Whatever plans Randy may have had in his head when he took over would have been blown out the water by the takeover at Man City. Who could have predicted that someone would come into the Premier League who would make even Abramovich seem like a two-bit market trader?
I wish i knew what point you were trying to make.
Quote from: DeKuip on May 10, 2011, 12:35:53 AMWhatever plans Randy may have had in his head when he took over would have been blown out the water by the takeover at Man City. Who could have predicted that someone would come into the Premier League who would make even Abramovich seem like a two-bit market trader?If he was scared off by Man City it would never have worked anyway. We were on 64 points at this stage of last season.
Quote from: Villadawg on May 09, 2011, 11:17:12 PMI wish i knew what point you were trying to make. ill try to simplify it sufficiently for you to grasp.what you described as how "the bookmaking industry" (but will no doubt turn out to be the first result google gave you) saw the field of contenders on the day your saviour left is largely meaningless as an indicator of the candidates we could realistically expect to find a manager from. The market would have been reacting to a sudden change (departure of aforementioned messiah that same day) and barely any money would have been punted on it at that point. You'd largely be looking at a list of obvious names thrown together by a trader at that point.If you are going to use what bookies said as am indicator of the pool we were fishing in, them the way the market moved over those weeks is a far better indicator than the day the market snapped into life.I'd ask you to explain what point you were trying to make, but I think I can guess. Would out be "we had plenty of options, look at what the bookies said" by any chance?
Quote from: pauliebentnuts on May 10, 2011, 12:57:52 AMQuote from: Villadawg on May 09, 2011, 11:17:12 PMI wish i knew what point you were trying to make. ill try to simplify it sufficiently for you to grasp.what you described as how "the bookmaking industry" (but will no doubt turn out to be the first result google gave you) saw the field of contenders on the day your saviour left is largely meaningless as an indicator of the candidates we could realistically expect to find a manager from. The market would have been reacting to a sudden change (departure of aforementioned messiah that same day) and barely any money would have been punted on it at that point. You'd largely be looking at a list of obvious names thrown together by a trader at that point.If you are going to use what bookies said as am indicator of the pool we were fishing in, them the way the market moved over those weeks is a far better indicator than the day the market snapped into life.I'd ask you to explain what point you were trying to make, but I think I can guess. Would out be "we had plenty of options, look at what the bookies said" by any chance?What a crock of shite