I believe one of the reasons Houllier was appointed was for his champions league experience which made me think Randy was still confident of challenging for it this season. After this seasons meltdown we can safely say the five year plan is dead in the water.
Quote from: ez on May 09, 2011, 10:16:11 PMI believe one of the reasons Houllier was appointed was for his champions league experience which made me think Randy was still confident of challenging for it this season. After this seasons meltdown we can safely say the five year plan is dead in the water.I think the main reason Houllier was appointed was because, in the first few weeks of the season, the list of other possible candidates was absolutely pathetic, and, whilst it was clearly a shit appointment, I think we sometimes forget this when looking back.Bob Bradley? Curbishley. Sven?*shudder*
. Everyone realises this season is a write off, and therefore who we bring in this summer and our performances next season will tell us more about where we really are.
It is the names that linger the longest which are the more significant.On the day he left, that list would have been chucked together by some trader with a page to fill. As time passed, the prices would have started to follow the money.
Quote from: pauliebentnuts on May 09, 2011, 10:45:26 PMIt is the names that linger the longest which are the more significant.On the day he left, that list would have been chucked together by some trader with a page to fill. As time passed, the prices would have started to follow the money.That market had been running for some time.
You can not plan for five years in football, because you get things like Man City happening, and throwing a gigantic spanner in the works. Closer to home, you get things like O'Neill flouncing off at zero notice, too.There are far too many random elements to throw into play.A five year objective is one thing, and something we should have. Any plan to achieve it would have to be very, very general indeed.
Quote from: Villadawg on May 09, 2011, 10:52:12 PMQuote from: pauliebentnuts on May 09, 2011, 10:45:26 PMIt is the names that linger the longest which are the more significant.On the day he left, that list would have been chucked together by some trader with a page to fill. As time passed, the prices would have started to follow the money.That market had been running for some time.You just said it was the day O'Neill left.That is not some time, and that market would have taken bugger all money at that point. If you mean the market was running before he left, then that's of pretty much zero import anyway, as his departure would have meant the market starting afresh in any case