collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Recent Posts

Re: Amadou Onana by PaulWinch again
[Today at 06:28:58 PM]
Re: Amadou Onana by danno
[Today at 06:26:45 PM]
Re: Winter 25-26 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 06:26:01 PM]
Re: Aston Villa v Brentford Post-Match Thread by brontebilly
[Today at 06:23:57 PM]
Re: Standard of Refereeing by Small Rodent
[Today at 06:23:37 PM]
Re: Amadou Onana by TCFKAE2
[Today at 06:22:57 PM]
Re: Amadou Onana by Ian.
[Today at 06:17:59 PM]
Re: Inordinately Press-ed off by Steve67
[Today at 06:12:37 PM]

Follow us on...

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28]   Go Down

Author Topic: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?  (Read 58377 times)

Offline Footy-Vill

  • Member
  • Posts: 9380
  • GM : 01.11.2024
Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« Reply #405 on: August 28, 2022, 03:05:33 PM »
I see we started with Watkins and Ings Vs West Ham.
Any good first half ?
Logged

Online Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59998
  • Age: 54
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« Reply #406 on: August 28, 2022, 03:06:07 PM »
No.
Logged

Offline Footy-Vill

  • Member
  • Posts: 9380
  • GM : 01.11.2024
Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« Reply #407 on: August 28, 2022, 03:16:18 PM »
Oh
Logged

Offline Axl Rose

  • Member
  • Posts: 14213
  • GM : 02.04.2022
Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« Reply #408 on: August 28, 2022, 03:19:44 PM »
Ollie if it's one up front.

If we go with two up top, Ings and Archer.
Logged

Offline Footy-Vill

  • Member
  • Posts: 9380
  • GM : 01.11.2024
Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« Reply #409 on: August 31, 2022, 07:04:36 PM »
Watkins has been preferred and SG seems to be saving Ings for Man City
However a positive result could see the same front 3
Gerrard plays this horses for courses but at some point archer to should be given more minutes.
Logged

Online Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59998
  • Age: 54
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« Reply #410 on: August 31, 2022, 07:09:47 PM »
Archer is carrying a hip injury so on this occasion I hope not. Quite surprised to see him included to be honest. Watch him get 20 minutes now!
Logged

Offline Footy-Vill

  • Member
  • Posts: 9380
  • GM : 01.11.2024
Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« Reply #411 on: September 01, 2022, 02:24:29 PM »
I think Archer should have been given some game time yesterday.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal