collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Villa Park Redevelopment by algy
[Today at 12:01:40 PM]


Stats, xG, etc. by Monty
[Today at 11:58:12 AM]


2026 Winter Olympics Milano-Cortina by cdbearsfan
[Today at 11:57:20 AM]


Will we qualify for the CL? by TheToffnar
[Today at 11:53:28 AM]


Harvey Elliott (signed on loan) by TheToffnar
[Today at 11:50:19 AM]


International Rugby by Villa Lew
[Today at 11:47:05 AM]


Winter 24/26 transfer window - the verdict by eamonn
[Today at 11:25:49 AM]


Europa League 2025-26 by Olneythelonely
[Today at 08:18:02 AM]

Recent Posts

Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by algy
[Today at 12:01:40 PM]


Re: Stats, xG, etc. by Monty
[Today at 11:58:12 AM]


Re: Stats, xG, etc. by frankmosswasmyuncle
[Today at 11:57:56 AM]


Re: 2026 Winter Olympics Milano-Cortina by cdbearsfan
[Today at 11:57:20 AM]


Re: 2026 Winter Olympics Milano-Cortina by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 11:56:35 AM]


Re: Stats, xG, etc. by cdbearsfan
[Today at 11:56:28 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by DB
[Today at 11:56:16 AM]


Re: Will we qualify for the CL? by TheToffnar
[Today at 11:53:28 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)  (Read 107482 times)

Offline PeterWithe

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11431
  • Location: Birmingham.
  • GM : 05.03.2026
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1410 on: Today at 08:04:38 AM »
We're in a different world now, 25+ doesn't necessarily give you guaranteed starters anymore, that's not to say that wasn't the plan with him. I still have no issue with the value.

No nor me. I see him as no better or worse than Buendia, so he isn’t needed, but I don’t see why he’s worth less.
« Last Edit: Today at 09:16:27 AM by PeterWithe »

Offline brontebilly

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12274
  • GM : 23.06.2026
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1411 on: Today at 08:44:33 AM »
We're in a different world now, 25+ doesn't necessarily give you guaranteed starters anymore, that's not to say that wasn't the plan with him. I still have no issue with the value.

No not me. I see him as no better or worse than Buendia, so he isn’t needed, but I don’t see why he’s worth less.

He's seven years younger than Buendia so there is that. Plenty of scope to improve. Emery seems to have dug himself into a hole of his own making here. But still turned to him to save the game v Brentford. Like any transfer if it doesn't work we could move him on after giving him a fair go, see Guessand, and I don't think we lose out too much on the deal.

Online Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18848
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2026
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1412 on: Today at 10:51:54 AM »
If Unai doesn’t rate him and doesn’t want him he will be off at the end of the loan period.
He didn't seem to rate Buendia ... life loves a redemption song.

Get the fee right and Elliott could become a very useful player for us (and England).

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 24918
  • Location: Salop
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1413 on: Today at 10:56:25 AM »
(It's nobody at Aston Villa's job to give a single fuck about the England team.)

Offline PeterWithe

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11431
  • Location: Birmingham.
  • GM : 05.03.2026
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1414 on: Today at 11:27:01 AM »
Maybe, but over the years, plenty of players have left and amongst the reasons they have given is that there is more chance of international recognition at other clubs. Although it was always more likely they left for more money.

Online Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18848
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2026
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1415 on: Today at 11:41:19 AM »
(It's nobody at Aston Villa's job to give a single fuck about the England team.)
Hence the use of parentheses.

Online TheToffnar

  • Member
  • Posts: 166
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1416 on: Today at 11:50:19 AM »
Even when we signed him I thought 35m was pretty extortionate. I'm not going to say either way whether that valuation was fair based on his time here because he's barely had a run in the team. If not for the clause, he'd have at least been given a similar amount of leeway to prove himself as Guessand had.

Whole things a mess. Either way, we may well have our hand forced if Buendia get's injured.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal