Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)

[PeterWithesShin]

Paul Elliott has more chance and he's 61.

[Toronto Villa]

If we have no interest in making it permanent then hopefully he goes back in Jan and he can crack on with his career.

Which I think will be a decent one for someone else leaving us scratching our head why we didn’t try to make it work. Feels to me that Emery wanted Paqueta and ended up with Elliott and he isn’t what Emery wanted. 

[Toronto Villa]

ET’s best friend Elliott has more chance of playing for us than Harvey Elliott

[PeterWithesShin]

ET’s best friend Elliott has more chance of playing for us than Harvey Elliott

Stop thief!

Maybe it's Elliot that needs to phone home this time.

[Toronto Villa]

ET’s best friend Elliott has more chance of playing for us than Harvey Elliott

Stop thief!

Maybe it's Elliot that needs to phone home this time.

[N'ZMAV]

Paul Elliott has more chance and he's 61.

and Deano finished him.

[Halfway to Moseley]

Denholm Elliott has more chance of playing than this bloke.

I wish he was trading places with Guessand.

[usav]

Actually feel sorry for him now on a human level. 

[DrGonzo]

I think Emery has made the pragmatic decision that he's not worth £35m considering the other options in that role and the needs of the squad.  He's gone in January if he can be.

[Toronto Villa]

Watching Emi today it’s also possible he’s eliminated the need for Elliott in that role. I’d still have him in the squad over Guessand.

[Sexual Ealing]

I think it's his hair. And if it is, frankly, I agree.

[caster troy]

The unexpected Buendia renaissance means we don’t need Elliot and can use the money elsewhere, I think it’s that simple.

[kippaxvilla2]

I read a report that they’re targeting a striker in January.  Assume they’ll use this towards that instead.

[Ian.]

It must be a mix of the Buendia effect and the lack of goals from our only striker and not needing Elliott. A shame but when the money is so tight, our needs must come first and not the player or Liverpool.

[algy]

Looks a very, very strange signing at the moment. Why would we agree to the rather stringent obligation to buy if he plays more than 10 games clause unless we’d already decided we’re want him. But then, why want him that much than the moment he turns up we lose all interest?

Very, very strange