Well I think Onana is potentially good enough.Tim isn’t, and therefore wasn’t worth keeping.
Potentially yep. He has all the attributes to be a top midfielder, and has put in some performances that demonstrate that. He hasn’t been consistent enough, in part due to injury, but he absolutely can do it. Whether he will I don’t know.
That he could be worth it? Yep
I don’t know yet, he’s going into his second year at the club. He wasn’t signed for a year, so we’ll see.But, and this is a difficult thing to benchmark, but if you look at players who have gone for similar fees in similar positions he’s there or there abouts.
Nunes, Keita, Tonali, Fred, and Ndombele. They’re not perfect comparisons clearly, but midfielders for similar fees. Tonali is the best of them I’d say and I think Onana isn’t that far off him.
Limited technique , all seems a bit awkward , certainly not a cultured playmaker .
It isn’t a comparison on all midfielders, it was more trying to get a benchmark around whether £50m is completely out of whack as a fee for Onana. As I say it’s not an easy thing to benchmark, and he’s one year into his time here, but I don’t think it’s that out of whack versus what he might be in the context of the Premier League.