I know what you mean, but we wouldn't benefit. Last time they reduced the size of the leagues, not one club reduced their season ticket prices. Can you see Chris Heck saying "only seventeen games this season, we've knocked a hundred quid off"? He'd be more likely to say "a higher percentage of our home games are now category A, we've put the prices up by two hundred each... bargain".
The Premier League should absolutely not be eighteen teams max. We were at the bottom not so long ago, let's not turn into one of those twatty arrogant clubs that thinks the whole league should be based around their needs.
Quote from: cdbearsfan on February 14, 2025, 04:53:43 PMThe Premier League should absolutely not be eighteen teams max. We were at the bottom not so long ago, let's not turn into one of those twatty arrogant clubs that thinks the whole league should be based around their needs.It absolutely should be. With a PL2 of 18 teams also and a much better share of the wealth. Less is more in terms of quality. And the TV money would still flow.
Just get rid of International games, they're crap.
Quote from: cdbearsfan on February 14, 2025, 04:53:43 PMThe Premier League should absolutely not be eighteen teams max. We were at the bottom not so long ago, let's not turn into one of those twatty arrogant clubs that thinks the whole league should be based around their needs.In our case it should.
The number of games is not too high. They're fitter and better trained and have better diets than ever before. They also get rotated in cup games more than ever before and there are more subs than ever before, too. They also play fewer domestic cup games than ever before because replays have been abolished (as has extra time in the League Cup before the semis).We should not forcibly relegate a load of teams because Champions League teams consider league games an inconvenience. In any case, if the top European leagues all reduced in number, UEFA would immediately increase the number of European games to plug the gap.