collapse collapse

* - On Sale NOW -

Claret Blue and Green

The story of Aston Villa’s Irish connection

£9.99 plus postage

For ROW Postage please email iotp@heroespublishing.net

Postal Location

Recent Topics

Amadou Onana by Garyth
[Today at 11:19:15 AM]


Will we qualify for the CL? by Garyth
[Today at 11:12:14 AM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Flamingo Lane
[Today at 11:04:40 AM]


FFP by andyh
[Today at 10:57:50 AM]


Johan Lange - appointed by Dave
[Today at 10:40:39 AM]


Jadon Sancho (loan) by paul_e
[Today at 10:33:38 AM]


Ross Barkley by paul_e
[Today at 10:20:43 AM]


Ollie Watkins by Drummond
[Today at 09:58:53 AM]

Recent Posts

Re: Amadou Onana by Garyth
[Today at 11:19:15 AM]


Re: Will we qualify for the CL? by Garyth
[Today at 11:12:14 AM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Flamingo Lane
[Today at 11:04:40 AM]


Re: FFP by andyh
[Today at 10:57:50 AM]


Re: Johan Lange - appointed by Dave
[Today at 10:40:39 AM]


Re: Johan Lange - appointed by Dave
[Today at 10:35:05 AM]


Re: Jadon Sancho (loan) by paul_e
[Today at 10:33:38 AM]


Re: Jadon Sancho (loan) by Smithy
[Today at 10:26:47 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Standard of Refereeing  (Read 94565 times)

Offline PeterWithe

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11575
  • Location: Birmingham.
  • GM : 12.03.2027
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1155 on: March 23, 2026, 05:41:15 PM »
Watching the pen/subsequent none pen back in the ground yesterday on the big screen, I thought it was ludicrous it was given in the first place, it should have been as clear as day to the ref from his position that it was a very clean tackle. Still, a rare occasion where VAR has done the job it was brought in to do. So all good.

Offline Baldy

  • Member
  • Posts: 1695
  • Location: Little Island somewhere
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1156 on: March 23, 2026, 05:49:39 PM »
Agreed 100%. What also surprised me was the ref gave us advantage, we missed the shot at goal and then he went back and gave us the penalty.

Most times if you don't take advantage of the advantage given the ref just plays on.

Very inconsistent.

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36812
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2026
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1157 on: March 23, 2026, 05:55:21 PM »
He saw Rogers effort and decided no advantage was taken. As for the pen, he might have thought the tackle came through Watkins to get the ball, ie the foul happened before any contact with the ball. Just a shame he totally disregarded the blatent fouling before entering the box as without the pulling back of the shirt and player, yellow card offences, he wouldn't have then been able to make that tackle.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2026, 05:57:22 PM by Somniloquism »

Offline Baldy

  • Member
  • Posts: 1695
  • Location: Little Island somewhere
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1158 on: March 23, 2026, 05:59:13 PM »
He saw Rogers effort and decided no advantage was taken. As for the pen, he might have thought the tackle came through Watkins to get the ball, ie the foul happened before any contact with the ball.

True but then most refs would have just played on after Rogers miss and not gone back for the pen.

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 10652
  • Location: Kidderminster
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1159 on: March 23, 2026, 06:02:05 PM »
He saw Rogers effort and decided no advantage was taken. As for the pen, he might have thought the tackle came through Watkins to get the ball, ie the foul happened before any contact with the ball. Just a shame he totally disregarded the blatent fouling before entering the box as without the pulling back of the shirt and player, yellow card offences, he wouldn't have then been able to make that tackle.
it should have been bought back for the foul on Watkins outside the box, possibly even a red card?

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 38932
  • Age: 46
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1160 on: March 23, 2026, 06:37:50 PM »
The real shame, for me, is that it was a foul for the pull back outside the box before the tackle but he waved that through.

Offline Pat McMahon

  • Member
  • Posts: 7460
  • Location: Shanghai - Blarney Stone for Villa games
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1161 on: March 23, 2026, 06:44:44 PM »
The real shame, for me, is that it was a foul for the pull back outside the box before the tackle but he waved that through.

I completely agree.

There was another first half break when Rogers was being mauled but escaped to set up a chance, which we didn't take advantage of. The ref came back to correctly give a yellow to the Wham player but didn't give the foul.  That peeved me.

Offline dcdavecollett

  • Member
  • Posts: 3970
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1162 on: Today at 02:54:28 AM »
Was the foul on Ollie by the last defender?

A red in that case.

Offline Villatillidie25

  • Member
  • Posts: 804
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1163 on: Today at 03:33:41 AM »
It was possibly a red but I suspect he was just about far enough away from the goal with some defenders broadly in the vicinity but would like to see it again. He should have been booked at minimum though.
We should have done much better from the “advantage” though.
It was never a penalty and VAR worked well for once (fixing an initially poor decision, which I guess is what it’s for)

Offline Baldy

  • Member
  • Posts: 1695
  • Location: Little Island somewhere
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1164 on: Today at 08:05:16 AM »
The real shame, for me, is that it was a foul for the pull back outside the box before the tackle but he waved that through.

I completely agree.

There was another first half break when Rogers was being mauled but escaped to set up a chance, which we didn't take advantage of. The ref came back to correctly give a yellow to the Wham player but didn't give the foul.  That peeved me.

Yes, very inconsistent.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 38932
  • Age: 46
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1165 on: Today at 09:48:52 AM »
It was possibly a red but I suspect he was just about far enough away from the goal with some defenders broadly in the vicinity but would like to see it again. He should have been booked at minimum though.
We should have done much better from the “advantage” though.
It was never a penalty and VAR worked well for once (fixing an initially poor decision, which I guess is what it’s for)

Yep, i agree, it was a yellow for me, which is why I think it's frustrating that it got lost in the penalty call because they guy who was holding their defence together on his own being on a yellow for an hour would've clearly helped us. I know it didn't make any difference in the end but that doesn't change that they got away with one.

Offline Drummond

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35341
  • Location: Everywhere, and nowhere.
  • GM : 17.10.2026
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1166 on: Today at 09:51:40 AM »
Given the shitstorm of the weekend, is it any wonder a ref will go for the early option?

They'll be replaced with robots before very long.

With a classified directive like Robocop, programmed by someone impartial like Mike Dean.

 I like that idea. 'You have 20 seconds to comply'.....

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal