collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Morgan Rogers  (Read 334905 times)

Online eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 35613
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3195 on: Today at 02:06:49 PM »
I think his agent would have insisted on a release clause for us to tie him up til the twenty turtees.

Offline Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 11307
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3196 on: Today at 02:20:21 PM »
I don't see any scenario where he's here in September.

Thankfully there's a small pool of clubs that can afford a £100m+ transfer fee, and some that can are currently below us in the league. 

Worst case, we should secure a decent fee for him and weirdly I feel Purslow's "sell one, buy three" approach would work better here.  Not sure why but Rogers feels replacable and less talismanic by comparison to Grealish.

Online TheToffnar

  • Member
  • Posts: 212
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3197 on: Today at 02:24:43 PM »
I feel the same, perhaps because we're in a better position overall and have had at least a year of relative success under Emery before Rogers was even considered.

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 36548
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3198 on: Today at 02:25:20 PM »
I don't see any scenario where he's here in September.

Thankfully there's a small pool of clubs that can afford a £100m+ transfer fee, and some that can are currently below us in the league. 

Worst case, we should secure a decent fee for him and weirdly I feel Purslow's "sell one, buy three" approach would work better here.  Not sure why but Rogers feels replacable and less talismanic by comparison to Grealish.

I thinks that only because we have lots of really good and important players now rather than just one.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 36960
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3199 on: Today at 02:28:27 PM »
I don't see any scenario where he's here in September.

Thankfully there's a small pool of clubs that can afford a £100m+ transfer fee, and some that can are currently below us in the league. 

Worst case, we should secure a decent fee for him and weirdly I feel Purslow's "sell one, buy three" approach would work better here.  Not sure why but Rogers feels replacable and less talismanic by comparison to Grealish.

I thinks that only because we have lots of really good and important players now rather than just one.

We do. On various podcasts I’ve heard the phrase ‘our best player’ referring to both Kamara and Tielemans recently. And I often think ‘Rogers?’. And sometimes I think ‘Martinez?’

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 36548
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3200 on: Today at 02:30:10 PM »
I don't see any scenario where he's here in September.

Thankfully there's a small pool of clubs that can afford a £100m+ transfer fee, and some that can are currently below us in the league. 

Worst case, we should secure a decent fee for him and weirdly I feel Purslow's "sell one, buy three" approach would work better here.  Not sure why but Rogers feels replacable and less talismanic by comparison to Grealish.

I thinks that only because we have lots of really good and important players now rather than just one.

We do. On various podcasts I’ve heard the phrase ‘our best player’ referring to both Kamara and Tielemans recently. And I often think ‘Rogers?’. And sometimes I think ‘Martinez?’

Konsa? McGinn? Guessand?

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 30212
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3201 on: Today at 02:30:36 PM »
We would've lost that game without Big Emi, for sure I think. He remains a matchwinner.

Online TheToffnar

  • Member
  • Posts: 212
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3202 on: Today at 02:34:12 PM »
I don't see any scenario where he's here in September.

Thankfully there's a small pool of clubs that can afford a £100m+ transfer fee, and some that can are currently below us in the league. 

Worst case, we should secure a decent fee for him and weirdly I feel Purslow's "sell one, buy three" approach would work better here.  Not sure why but Rogers feels replacable and less talismanic by comparison to Grealish.

I thinks that only because we have lots of really good and important players now rather than just one.

We do. On various podcasts I’ve heard the phrase ‘our best player’ referring to both Kamara and Tielemans recently. And I often think ‘Rogers?’. And sometimes I think ‘Martinez?’

I think there's a principal difference between 'most talented' and 'most consistent', as well as just the general confirmation bias of what it is to be a good defender and how that can often be disregarded until you have a stinker.

Konsa and Kamara almost never have bad games, but to the untrained eye can appear just to be 'doing a job', whereas when Rogers is on it, he looks like an obvious generational talent that will win games for us single handedly.

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 36548
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3203 on: Today at 02:34:23 PM »
We would've lost that game without Big Emi, for sure I think. He remains a matchwinner.

Indeed. We undoubtedly have the best pair of keepers in league, and when all fit the best midfield for my money.

Online Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49504
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 17.09.2026
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3204 on: Today at 02:49:10 PM »
We would've lost that game without Big Emi, for sure I think. He remains a matchwinner.

Indeed. We undoubtedly have the best pair of keepers in league, and when all fit the best midfield for my money.

I'm a big fan of our current goalkeeping set-up, but I'd say that Donnarumma / Trafford easily beats it. Alisson and the big Georgian with the tricky name probably does too. And maybe the Arsenal pair.

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 36548
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3205 on: Today at 03:20:26 PM »
We would've lost that game without Big Emi, for sure I think. He remains a matchwinner.

Indeed. We undoubtedly have the best pair of keepers in league, and when all fit the best midfield for my money.

I'm a big fan of our current goalkeeping set-up, but I'd say that Donnarumma / Trafford easily beats it. Alisson and the big Georgian with the tricky name probably does too. And maybe the Arsenal pair.

I don't have either of the pair at City as better than our equivalent, Trafford in time but not right now, forgot about the big fucker at Anfield, I do rate him and will not attempt his name, don't know who is the Arsenal back up but they can piss off n'all.

I stand by my comments

Offline Tuscans

  • Member
  • Posts: 9258
  • Age: 47
  • Location: Newport, South Wales
  • GM : 08.02.15
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3206 on: Today at 03:30:43 PM »
We would've lost that game without Big Emi, for sure I think. He remains a matchwinner.

Indeed. We undoubtedly have the best pair of keepers in league, and when all fit the best midfield for my money.

I'm a big fan of our current goalkeeping set-up, but I'd say that Donnarumma / Trafford easily beats it. Alisson and the big Georgian with the tricky name probably does too. And maybe the Arsenal pair.

I don't have either of the pair at City as better than our equivalent, Trafford in time but not right now, forgot about the big fucker at Anfield, I do rate him and will not attempt his name, don't know who is the Arsenal back up but they can piss off n'all.

I stand by my comments
Kepa

Online kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 30161
  • Location: Hatfield - the nice part of Donny.
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3207 on: Today at 03:48:27 PM »
Citeh would be my guess.  Not that they need him in anyway shape or form but just because they can stop anyone else signing him, screw us over and then ruin his career so he ends up somewhere that’s no threat to them.

Offline rob_bridge

  • Member
  • Posts: 10258
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Shirleyshire
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3208 on: Today at 03:54:00 PM »
I don't see any scenario where he's here in September.

Thankfully there's a small pool of clubs that can afford a £100m+ transfer fee, and some that can are currently below us in the league. 

Worst case, we should secure a decent fee for him and weirdly I feel Purslow's "sell one, buy three" approach would work better here.  Not sure why but Rogers feels replacable and less talismanic by comparison to Grealish.

I thinks that only because we have lots of really good and important players now rather than just one.

We do. On various podcasts I’ve heard the phrase ‘our best player’ referring to both Kamara and Tielemans recently. And I often think ‘Rogers?’. And sometimes I think ‘Martinez?’

Kamara for me. Depends on best - most valuable to the team in way we play. Martinez is World Star in his position. Rogers the Star player in the team. 

Eons ago (late 90s) I had chat with one of my Dutch mates and asked who was best player for Netherlands and he said Davids - more so than Bergkamp even. 

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 25008
  • Location: Salop
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #3209 on: Today at 04:19:57 PM »
Davids was hardly a water carrier. He was a hell of a player.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal