collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Games Moved for TV by Lsvilla
[Today at 03:57:07 PM]


Winter 25-26 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by robleflaneur
[Today at 03:56:40 PM]


Kits 25/26 by Concrete Tom
[Today at 03:51:57 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by Monty
[Today at 03:42:02 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Nev
[Today at 03:33:44 PM]


GUESS THE CROWD R12: ASTON VILLA v Manc United Sunday, 21st December! by sid1964
[Today at 03:30:22 PM]


Ollie Watkins by eamonn
[Today at 03:08:25 PM]


Morgan Rogers by OCD
[Today at 02:53:45 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Morgan Rogers  (Read 305021 times)

Online Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48766
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 17.09.2026
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2955 on: Today at 12:48:50 PM »
They've picked a Villa player.

I bet every single one of them who voted for him picked an Argentina player.

Offline Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 11031
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2956 on: Today at 12:49:30 PM »
There's a flaw to the voting system.  The ex-players/journalists have too much focus on the big clubs/leagues and maybe their own quirky club/country.  Cumulatively that means loads of votes for the big clubs. 

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 24217
  • Location: Salop
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2957 on: Today at 12:57:22 PM »
It's a good job none of it matters even slightly.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 75566
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2958 on: Today at 01:01:23 PM »
It's a good job none of it matters even slightly.

Hopefully my Member of Parliament disagrees. I've already sent a complaint.

Offline Rigadon

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9374
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2959 on: Today at 01:03:48 PM »
It's a good job none of it matters even slightly.

Maybe it matters more than you think, but perhaps not as much as other more emotive posters (I'm more in the latter camp!) might think!  Obvs I'm talking about this in a football context, it means zilch in the actual grand scheme of life.

I'd imagine players do look at these lists and wonder if they were at a different club their stock / wages would be higher.  I also think it possibly impacts a players transfer value. 

Anyway, I think he deserves to be on that list somewhere, as does John McGinn (esp when you add his impact on the Scottish team and their qualification for the WC).

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 24217
  • Location: Salop
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2960 on: Today at 01:04:59 PM »
It's a good job none of it matters even slightly.

Maybe it matters more than you think


No, it matters precisely as much as I think.

Offline Rigadon

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9374
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2961 on: Today at 01:05:08 PM »
It's a good job none of it matters even slightly.

Hopefully my Member of Parliament disagrees. I've already sent a complaint.

:D I'm sure there will be outrage.


Offline Rigadon

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9374
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2962 on: Today at 01:05:28 PM »
It's a good job none of it matters even slightly.

Maybe it matters more than you think


No, it matters precisely as much as I think.

To you.

Online Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48766
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 17.09.2026
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2963 on: Today at 01:08:30 PM »
There's a flaw to the voting system.  The ex-players/journalists have too much focus on the big clubs/leagues and maybe their own quirky club/country.  Cumulatively that means loads of votes for the big clubs. 

I don't think most people would see that as a flaw.

Obviously as grumpy "why haven't they picked Rogers / Kamara / Tielemans?!?" Villa fans, we would because it means that Our Brave Boys Don't Get The Recognition* They Deserve.

But most people would probably accept that the better players are likely to play for the bigger, richer clubs so pointless lists like this that are being compiled from the opinions of *checks list* the Editor at the Sport Orda website in Kazakhstan, are probably going to be made up of the bigger names from the bigger teams and bigger countries.

After his four goals at the World Cup, Rogers will be all over lists like this in twelve months, even if he's still just the same player.


*recognition from a little-read, subjective piece in a mediocre newspaper.

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 36071
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2964 on: Today at 01:13:27 PM »
The list has always felt about 18 months or so out of date, every year.

Offline mrfuse

  • Member
  • Posts: 3885
  • GM : 28.02.2023
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2965 on: Today at 02:07:41 PM »
That’s why I rate Cole Palmer and Morgan Rogers higher. Palmer was outstanding even when Chelsea were an absolute mess — he carried them and made things happen on his own.

Palmer scored one goal between the middle of January and the end of last season. He wasn't making much happen then.

That was a dip in form like every player goes though not representative of his general play.

Online Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 41937
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2966 on: Today at 02:37:56 PM »
The list has always felt about 18 months or so out of date, every year.

True plus it relies on the TV games broadcast around the world, for example, how else would Liverpool's MacAllister get ranked number 35? It's just as well MacAllister plays for Argentina as he wouldn't get in Scotland's midfield. If he played for us he'd be sitting in the bench.

Offline Skipper_The_Eyechild

  • Member
  • Posts: 456
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2967 on: Today at 02:40:31 PM »
To be fair, a lot of midfielders wouldn't get in to our starting XI.

Offline Rigadon

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9374
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2968 on: Today at 02:52:01 PM »
To be fair, a lot of midfielders wouldn't get in to our starting XI.

Indeed.  A good deal of that is surely down to the coaching being so amazing that the team is greater than the sum of its parts.  But it's also because we do have sensational footballers.  There aren't many players I'd swap with Rogers, McGinn, Tielemanns and Kamara.

Offline OCD

  • Member
  • Posts: 34209
  • Location: Stuck in the middle with you
    • http://www.rightconsultant.com
  • GM : May, 2012
Re: Morgan Rogers
« Reply #2969 on: Today at 02:53:45 PM »
To be fair, a lot of midfielders wouldn't get in to our starting XI.

Indeed.  A good deal of that is surely down to the coaching being so amazing that the team is greater than the sum of its parts.  But it's also because we do have sensational footballers.  There aren't many players I'd swap with Rogers, McGinn, Tielemanns and Kamara.

Not bad for about £14m between them.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal