Think back to August 2019 at Selhurst Park. Remember Kevin Friend booking Jack for diving resulting in Henri Lansbury's goal being disallowed? This cost us a draw and a point. To me, last Saturday was a bit of redemption/payback for that cruel decision.
All I'll say about the penalty is that I'd have been annoyed if it had been up the other end. I can see the argument for it being so and not being a pen, but we'll see this happen against us I'm sure. Within a week you'll see a very similar challenge in a game go to VAR and not get given. It's like the Gordon pen in Newcastle Brentford compared to one that was denied for Brentford a few weeks back. Consistency is dire.
Quote from: supertom on September 18, 2023, 03:20:46 PMAll I'll say about the penalty is that I'd have been annoyed if it had been up the other end. I can see the argument for it being so and not being a pen, but we'll see this happen against us I'm sure. Within a week you'll see a very similar challenge in a game go to VAR and not get given. It's like the Gordon pen in Newcastle Brentford compared to one that was denied for Brentford a few weeks back. Consistency is dire. I just don't get that thinking. Just look at what actually happens and its a clear penalty no matter what shirt the defender is wearing.
Quote from: pablo_picasso on September 18, 2023, 12:26:26 PMQuote from: martyn ellis on September 18, 2023, 10:46:31 AMJust to clarify - from Garth Crooks:Douglas Luiz (Aston Villa): I thought that Crystal Palace assistant manager Paddy McCarthy's analysis on the penalty awarded to Villa was spot on. Any referee who needs five minutes to make a decision must have sufficient doubts, but that didn't stop Darren England from compounding his error of judgment.And yet the rules to overturn his decision mean that the error has to be "clear & obvious". Any referee who needs five minutes to make a decision must not see a "clear & obvious" error.Therefore, penalty...And thats without the fact that it was still a penalty, with or without VAR, because feathering the ball with your toenail fluff & then going through the man to kick the ball means that its a foul whichever way you look at it.And Im not convinced he even got his toenail fluff on the ball tbh...I would put a countdown timer on VAR. If it takes longer, than say a minute, it's not a clear and obvious and the on-field decision stands.
Quote from: martyn ellis on September 18, 2023, 10:46:31 AMJust to clarify - from Garth Crooks:Douglas Luiz (Aston Villa): I thought that Crystal Palace assistant manager Paddy McCarthy's analysis on the penalty awarded to Villa was spot on. Any referee who needs five minutes to make a decision must have sufficient doubts, but that didn't stop Darren England from compounding his error of judgment.And yet the rules to overturn his decision mean that the error has to be "clear & obvious". Any referee who needs five minutes to make a decision must not see a "clear & obvious" error.Therefore, penalty...And thats without the fact that it was still a penalty, with or without VAR, because feathering the ball with your toenail fluff & then going through the man to kick the ball means that its a foul whichever way you look at it.And Im not convinced he even got his toenail fluff on the ball tbh...
Just to clarify - from Garth Crooks:Douglas Luiz (Aston Villa): I thought that Crystal Palace assistant manager Paddy McCarthy's analysis on the penalty awarded to Villa was spot on. Any referee who needs five minutes to make a decision must have sufficient doubts, but that didn't stop Darren England from compounding his error of judgment.