Quote from: pauliewalnuts on June 08, 2022, 10:20:53 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on June 08, 2022, 10:12:00 AMI think the fees for all of them were about right tbh.Didn't we only get 8m for Delph?Having just signed a new contract. Release clause perhaps.
Quote from: chrisw1 on June 08, 2022, 10:12:00 AMI think the fees for all of them were about right tbh.Didn't we only get 8m for Delph?
I think the fees for all of them were about right tbh.
Quote from: chrisw1 on June 08, 2022, 10:08:46 AMQuote from: Exeter 77 on June 08, 2022, 07:43:43 AMQuote from: Deano's Mullet on June 08, 2022, 06:52:38 AMSilly story I read this morninh was City bidding for Mings for 50 million. He'd never be a regular starter but would probably disrupt us a little bit - not that I believe the story.Disrupting other clubs is part of Man City's policy as far as I can tell.I'm not sure giving us significantly more than a player is worth is really disrupting us that much tbh.Joe, Delph, Barry, Milner
Quote from: Exeter 77 on June 08, 2022, 07:43:43 AMQuote from: Deano's Mullet on June 08, 2022, 06:52:38 AMSilly story I read this morninh was City bidding for Mings for 50 million. He'd never be a regular starter but would probably disrupt us a little bit - not that I believe the story.Disrupting other clubs is part of Man City's policy as far as I can tell.I'm not sure giving us significantly more than a player is worth is really disrupting us that much tbh.
Quote from: Deano's Mullet on June 08, 2022, 06:52:38 AMSilly story I read this morninh was City bidding for Mings for 50 million. He'd never be a regular starter but would probably disrupt us a little bit - not that I believe the story.Disrupting other clubs is part of Man City's policy as far as I can tell.
Silly story I read this morninh was City bidding for Mings for 50 million. He'd never be a regular starter but would probably disrupt us a little bit - not that I believe the story.
I imagine if someone did come in with an offer for Mings that was too good to turn down, we would just go and get Bassey for half the money.
Apart from signing four of our captains in the last decade or so, the way Man City do business is fucking appalling. Player is tapped up and personal terms agreed (they never get pinged for this) story leaked to their outriders in the press about the player for weeks, and then the official bid. It’s how they operate and they’re a bunch of fucking scumbags.
For us to be flogging Targett for 12-15 mil, there must have been a fee pre-agreed and we’ve been haggling over installments.Very poor from our management
I believe Delph was unfairly treated. He signed his new contract and then I think the club pushed him out as we wanted the money. Signing that contract cost him a big signing on fee and a huge amount of hatred from Villa fans. It made us several million quid we otherwise wouldn't have got.
Quote from: frank black on June 08, 2022, 11:50:14 AMFor us to be flogging Targett for 12-15 mil, there must have been a fee pre-agreed and we’ve been haggling over installments.Very poor from our managementYes, because the one thing our management is known for is its amateur approach to transfer deals. Deary me.
Quote from: Drummond on June 08, 2022, 10:48:31 AMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on June 08, 2022, 10:20:53 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on June 08, 2022, 10:12:00 AMI think the fees for all of them were about right tbh.Didn't we only get 8m for Delph?Having just signed a new contract. Release clause perhaps.I believe Delph was unfairly treated. He signed his new contract and then I think the club pushed him out as we wanted the money. Signing that contract cost him a big signing on fee and a huge amount of hatred from Villa fans. It made us several million quid we otherwise wouldn't have got.
Quote from: frank black on June 08, 2022, 11:50:14 AMFor us to be flogging Targett for 12-15 mil, there must have been a fee pre-agreed and we’ve been haggling over installments.Very poor from our managementThey apparently paid a loan fee of £2-3m that is now included as part of the final fee, i.e. £15m which means they've £12m to pay.I'd like to keep him as back up, but the reality is he wouldn't be first choice and isn't going to get any better. We need someone younger, with scope to improve, both in terms of quality and price. I'm not sure he's worth much more to us, but clearly is to them.Good luck to him.