Sounds like Matt Targett's off to Newcastle for £12m. (Daily Mail)Thought he might have gone for a bit more than that, but I'd imagine that means there's a backup left back in the pipeline.
Quote from: Deano's Mullet on June 08, 2022, 06:52:38 AMSilly story I read this morninh was City bidding for Mings for 50 million. He'd never be a regular starter but would probably disrupt us a little bit - not that I believe the story.Disrupting other clubs is part of Man City's policy as far as I can tell.
Silly story I read this morninh was City bidding for Mings for 50 million. He'd never be a regular starter but would probably disrupt us a little bit - not that I believe the story.
Quote from: algy on June 08, 2022, 07:57:29 AMSounds like Matt Targett's off to Newcastle for £12m. (Daily Mail)Thought he might have gone for a bit more than that, but I'd imagine that means there's a backup left back in the pipeline.In the current market that price is giving Target away. It would cost at least that much to replace him in the squad with a rookie.
I doubt it would be for as little as £12m when we paid more than that for him.
Quote from: Clampy on June 08, 2022, 08:42:42 AMI doubt it would be for as little as £12m when we paid more than that for him. I’ve heard it’s 15mil, when you include the loan fees and add ons.
Quote from: Exeter 77 on June 08, 2022, 07:43:43 AMQuote from: Deano's Mullet on June 08, 2022, 06:52:38 AMSilly story I read this morninh was City bidding for Mings for 50 million. He'd never be a regular starter but would probably disrupt us a little bit - not that I believe the story.Disrupting other clubs is part of Man City's policy as far as I can tell.I'm not sure giving us significantly more than a player is worth is really disrupting us that much tbh.
I think the fees for all of them were about right tbh.
Quote from: chrisw1 on June 08, 2022, 10:12:00 AMI think the fees for all of them were about right tbh.Didn't we only get 8m for Delph?