collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: FFP  (Read 520261 times)

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72819
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #5415 on: August 19, 2025, 08:34:54 PM »
The first part is fucked up. The second part is only because he underperformed last season, or he would be going somewhere better (or staying at Juventus).

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35707
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #5416 on: August 19, 2025, 08:52:48 PM »
A question. Last accounts wages shot up from £194m to £252m. Is that likely to be (a) because it was 13 months instead of 12 and (b) owing to bonuses for qualifying for the Champions League. Therefor we should see a natural 7% reduction because it's one month less and also a reduction in bonuses as we only qualified for the Europa?

Yes to both is what I’m thinking. Definitely for the 13 month thing. Two Junes in that period as well, which is the worst possible month to have two of for a football club. Not much revenue, wages the same.

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 42959
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: FFP
« Reply #5417 on: August 19, 2025, 09:57:21 PM »
We have a net soend of £10m in 2 years compared to £434m of Man United.

Offline ADVILLAFAN

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13241
  • Location: Shirley
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #5418 on: Today at 07:03:01 AM »
If Forest qualify for Europe again this Season, am I right in thinking they will also find UEFA's spending rules a lot more inhibiting?

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31073
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: FFP
« Reply #5419 on: Today at 07:04:40 AM »
If Forest qualify for Europe again this Season, am I right in thinking they will also find UEFA's spending rules a lot more inhibiting?

Massively.

Offline Sdwbvf

  • Member
  • Posts: 343
Re: FFP
« Reply #5420 on: Today at 02:47:18 PM »
Incredible isn't it?  Bournemouth, they of the 23000 gates for a home game, have spent 100 million quid.  We can't spend shit.

I think it’s more like 12,000 isn’t it?

11,214 according to this:

https://footballrates.com/attendances/average-2024

Blimey. Worcester City have a bigger ground

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72819
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #5421 on: Today at 02:51:46 PM »
It's underwater, though.

Offline kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 28058
  • Location: Hatfield - the nice part of Donny.
Re: FFP
« Reply #5422 on: Today at 03:16:05 PM »
There looks to be an interesting article on fans fury in the weekend games.  But it’s behind a paywall if anyone can oblige.  I like his writing.  I remember him calling out MON’s limitations when he was with us.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72819
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #5423 on: Today at 03:16:10 PM »
I'm starting to see a few articles like this. I think public opinion is shifting and the "moaning" is working, to an extent.

Do transfers like Ramsey's mean a rule rethink is needed? - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c0kz16d80kro

Offline Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58563
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #5424 on: Today at 04:06:07 PM »
What is emerging is conversation not just about the rule and it's "possible" unintended consequences (there is always a school of thought or conspiracy theory that the big established high commercial revenue teams wanted this all along), but the obvious fact that the clubs most impact buy this during this window are the closest challengers to the established few. Just as Newcastle, Villa get to breaking into the top 4 with any regularity the financial doors slam shut. The disparity this summer between what we have spent or Newcastle and that of the commericial big 6 has never been greater. And with the current rules in place, if it's always spend relative to revenues then nobody outside those clubs will bridge the gap. They will always secure the best deals, go on elaborate tours, spend the most building their brands across the world. Nobody will catch up.

Offline jwarry

  • Member
  • Posts: 6736
  • Location: Kyrenia, Northern Cyprus
Re: FFP
« Reply #5425 on: Today at 04:16:25 PM »
Incredible isn't it?  Bournemouth, they of the 23000 gates for a home game, have spent 100 million quid.  We can't spend shit.

I think it’s more like 12,000 isn’t it?

11,214 according to this:

https://footballrates.com/attendances/average-2024

Blimey. Worcester City have a bigger ground

Where is that graphic from?  It’s not right as someone who used to live in Reading they have stadium of about 24k but done appear anywhere?!?

Online Concrete Tom

  • Member
  • Posts: 157
  • GM : Aug, 2013
Re: FFP
« Reply #5426 on: Today at 04:21:21 PM »
Incredible isn't it?  Bournemouth, they of the 23000 gates for a home game, have spent 100 million quid.  We can't spend shit.

I think it’s more like 12,000 isn’t it?

11,214 according to this:

https://footballrates.com/attendances/average-2024

Blimey. Worcester City have a bigger ground

Where is that graphic from?  It’s not right as someone who used to live in Reading they have stadium of about 24k but done appear anywhere?!?

It's attendances rather than capacity. Aren't Royals fans less than enamoured with their owners at the moment?

Online Concrete Tom

  • Member
  • Posts: 157
  • GM : Aug, 2013
Re: FFP
« Reply #5427 on: Today at 04:22:27 PM »
Incredible isn't it?  Bournemouth, they of the 23000 gates for a home game, have spent 100 million quid.  We can't spend shit.

I think it’s more like 12,000 isn’t it?

11,214 according to this:

https://footballrates.com/attendances/average-2024

Blimey. Worcester City have a bigger ground

Where is that graphic from?  It’s not right as someone who used to live in Reading they have stadium of about 24k but done appear anywhere?!?

It's attendances rather than capacity. Aren't Royals fans less than enamoured with their owners at the moment?

EDIT: They've dropped to League 1 and since been taken over.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal