And Manure did offer lower then his worth.QuoteUnited felt they could land top target Branthwaite for £35million, plus another £8million in add-ons, because Everton would have to sell. They thought the Blues would need to raise cash in the transfer market before the June 30 cut-off point for last season’s accounts to avoid falling foul of the Premier League’s PSRs again.Everton managed to get £10mil for Dobbin though which meant they cleared PSR and then didn't need to sell.And the same reasoning for Forest to flaunt the rules when they needed to sell Johnson and were originally being offered a lot lower by clubs due to their needs. Still should have been done more than a few points though as they chose not to sell him rather then raise money other ways, especially after buying 20 odd players the same season.
United felt they could land top target Branthwaite for £35million, plus another £8million in add-ons, because Everton would have to sell. They thought the Blues would need to raise cash in the transfer market before the June 30 cut-off point for last season’s accounts to avoid falling foul of the Premier League’s PSRs again.
Isn't this summer the last of that and the first of the squad cost ratio crap that makes it even more complicated and even more weighted to the established commercial whales
Matt Maher of the Express and Star just quoted more than an £80m loss for 23/24 season.So the accounts must be out there somewhere... just not Companies House yet.
Quote from: Concrete Tom on March 10, 2025, 06:01:21 PMMatt Maher of the Express and Star just quoted more than an £80m loss for 23/24 season.So the accounts must be out there somewhere... just not Companies House yet.Crikey. Whilst we must push the boundaries that sounds like an unsustainable amount. That must include the sales of Luiz and Diaby too, right?
£80m? Wouldn’t that put us at a £200m loss over the three year period so in breach of PSR?
Quote from: caster troy on March 10, 2025, 09:46:41 PM£80m? Wouldn’t that put us at a £200m loss over the three year period so in breach of PSR?PSR is a separate calculation. We satisfied PSR by selling Luiz and Kellyman.
Quote from: Concrete Tom on March 10, 2025, 09:55:33 PMQuote from: caster troy on March 10, 2025, 09:46:41 PM£80m? Wouldn’t that put us at a £200m loss over the three year period so in breach of PSR?PSR is a separate calculation. We satisfied PSR by selling Luiz and Kellyman.So these accounts are the formal version (HMRC) of what’s already been signed off (for PSR)?