collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Emi Martinez by Hookeysmith
[Today at 05:59:27 PM]


The NFL Thread (with added College Football) by Meanwood Villa
[Today at 05:57:31 PM]


FFP by Monty
[Today at 05:43:00 PM]


Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by Mister E
[Today at 04:05:07 PM]


Kadan Young (on loan at Royal Antwerp) by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 03:26:15 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by Matt C
[Today at 02:01:14 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Drummond
[Today at 01:48:10 PM]


Kits 25/26 by Drummond
[Today at 01:47:09 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Emi Martinez by Hookeysmith
[Today at 05:59:27 PM]


Re: The NFL Thread (with added College Football) by Meanwood Villa
[Today at 05:57:31 PM]


Re: FFP by Monty
[Today at 05:43:00 PM]


Re: FFP by cdbearsfan
[Today at 05:41:08 PM]


Re: FFP by cdbearsfan
[Today at 05:40:42 PM]


Re: FFP by PaulWinch again
[Today at 05:39:47 PM]


Re: FFP by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 05:37:47 PM]


Re: FFP by cdbearsfan
[Today at 05:24:13 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: FFP  (Read 434929 times)

Online Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 10637
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: FFP
« Reply #2430 on: May 04, 2024, 08:47:35 AM »
Are we better signing players on loan this summer and buying them next to avoid losses this year?

Offline Simon Page

  • Member
  • Posts: 5478
Re: FFP
« Reply #2431 on: May 04, 2024, 01:35:21 PM »
Could we consolidate all our players into one monthly player?

Between this and computerised ball technology in the other thread, I'm really hating football again. And it's not because I'm old cuz I'm not, honest.

Offline Smithy

  • Member
  • Posts: 7182
  • Location: Windsor, Royal Berkshire, la de da
  • GM : 12.12.2024
Re: FFP
« Reply #2432 on: May 04, 2024, 01:57:07 PM »
Are we better signing players on loan this summer and buying them next to avoid losses this year?

Depends if the loans have a fee, or not (and most do).  Reports are for example that Zaniolo's loan fee was £4.25m.

The immediate FFP impact of signing a £25m player on a 5-year contract, or loaning one for a season with a £5m fee, is identical.

Offline Baldy

  • Member
  • Posts: 1364
  • Location: Little Island somewhere
Re: FFP
« Reply #2433 on: May 07, 2024, 05:24:03 PM »
With talk of Leicester being deducted points next season, Everton possibly going into administration (automatic 9 points deduction) and Chelsea's woes the league table could look interesting next season before a ball is even kicked!!

Offline lovejoy

  • Member
  • Posts: 9479
  • Location: Haywards Heath
Re: FFP
« Reply #2434 on: May 07, 2024, 06:14:39 PM »
Are we better signing players on loan this summer and buying them next to avoid losses this year?

Depends if the loans have a fee, or not (and most do).  Reports are for example that Zaniolo's loan fee was £4.25m.

The immediate FFP impact of signing a £25m player on a 5-year contract, or loaning one for a season with a £5m fee, is identical.

A loan gives flexibility for future years as stated above you arent locked in whereas there is no resale value.

Offline Smithy

  • Member
  • Posts: 7182
  • Location: Windsor, Royal Berkshire, la de da
  • GM : 12.12.2024
Re: FFP
« Reply #2435 on: May 07, 2024, 06:46:02 PM »
Are we better signing players on loan this summer and buying them next to avoid losses this year?

Depends if the loans have a fee, or not (and most do).  Reports are for example that Zaniolo's loan fee was £4.25m.

The immediate FFP impact of signing a £25m player on a 5-year contract, or loaning one for a season with a £5m fee, is identical.

A loan gives flexibility for future years as stated above you arent locked in whereas there is no resale value.

Oh yes, totally agree :-). I just thought the original question was related to our current position close to the FFP limit and what we could do "this summer".  In that context, a loan fee of £5m or 5 year contract for £25m player have the same FFP impact in the short term.

Offline PeterWithe

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10613
  • Location: Birmingham.
  • GM : 05.03.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #2436 on: May 19, 2024, 09:26:44 AM »

Online Olneythelonely

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8519
  • Location: Selly Park
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: FFP
« Reply #2437 on: May 19, 2024, 11:03:51 AM »
If we want to spend money, that’s true, right? Like most teams. I suppose Champions League qualification might have relieved some pressure on us to sell to balance the books.

Online Nev

  • Member
  • Posts: 15813
  • Location: Vibrania
  • GM : 03.02.2022
Re: FFP
« Reply #2438 on: May 19, 2024, 11:09:45 AM »
It isn't Black Sabbath.

Offline Dogtanian

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7545
  • Location: The Streets of Rage ( Tamworth )
  • GM : 06.06.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #2439 on: May 19, 2024, 11:25:56 AM »
The Guardian still going with the line that we will have to sell.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/article/2024/may/18/aston-villa-back-in-big-time-on-their-own-merits

Again, it’s all assumptions based on the losses, without actually looking into the accounts or the FFP deductions. Nobody knows the real situation for this financial year except the club, who would be fucking stupid to leak it and undermine any negotiation if it were true.

They can’t credit little old Aston Villa getting into the top four and making it work, so they just assume it’s all going to backfire.

Like they assumed we’d ‘do a Fulham’ when we came up and spent money. And that playing in europe would fuck us in the league.

It’s just lazy journalism.

Offline Pete3206

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17869
  • Location: Erdington
  • GM : PCM
Re: FFP
« Reply #2440 on: May 19, 2024, 11:31:24 AM »
Speculation will be rife over our players attracting interest this summer, especially for our participants in the Euros and Copa America. They've got column inches to fill and they'll basically write anything on speculation and rumour for attention. Best ignored until something actually transpires.

Offline Rigadon

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8839
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: FFP
« Reply #2441 on: May 19, 2024, 11:43:38 AM »
The Guardian still going with the line that we will have to sell.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/article/2024/may/18/aston-villa-back-in-big-time-on-their-own-merits

The tone of that article is fairly typical of the Guardian.  The political coverage is usually engaging and interesting, but I’m increasingly annoyed by their football coverage. 

Offline Steve67

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13733
  • Location: Down south now. Born in Aston.
  • GM : 08.12.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #2442 on: May 19, 2024, 02:24:19 PM »
We are about to get over 50 mill in prize money for finishing 4th, is that not taken into account, given it is income?

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 25938
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: FFP
« Reply #2443 on: May 19, 2024, 02:29:00 PM »
We are about to get over 50 mill in prize money for finishing 4th, is that not taken into account, given it is income?
Of course it is, but not by some journalists though.

Offline wince

  • Member
  • Posts: 4654
  • Location: Deepest Darkest Yardley
Re: FFP
« Reply #2444 on: May 19, 2024, 02:35:51 PM »
It isn't Black Sabbath.
Some will get paranoid though

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal