Quote from: nick harper on March 05, 2024, 04:10:23 PMThis is from The Times and illustrates the challenge trying to compete….Highest wage bills in the Premier League2022-23 season. Starred is 21/22 season.Man City (59% of turnover)£422.9mLiverpool (62%)£373mChelsea (71%)*£340mMan Utd (51%)£331.4mArsenal (51%)£234.7mTottenham (47%)*£209mAston Villa (89%)£194.2mNewcastle (75%)£186mSorry to go back a couple of pages, but this really highlights the financial gap between the so called 'big six'. The fact that Manchester City can have such a massive wage bill and for it to be such a relatively small percentage of their turnover (compared to others) is sobering really.
This is from The Times and illustrates the challenge trying to compete….Highest wage bills in the Premier League2022-23 season. Starred is 21/22 season.Man City (59% of turnover)£422.9mLiverpool (62%)£373mChelsea (71%)*£340mMan Utd (51%)£331.4mArsenal (51%)£234.7mTottenham (47%)*£209mAston Villa (89%)£194.2mNewcastle (75%)£186m
Quote from: Risso on March 06, 2024, 01:26:39 PMHere's an idea. We're miles behind on the other top 6 teams for commercial revenue, but all deals have to be on commercial terms to satisfy the Premier League/UEFA. What would happen if say, an entirely unconnected Egyptian company (choosing a territory *completely* at random) was to buy £50m of shirts from us, for selling on in Africa and the middle east. Obviously they'd have to pay the going rate for the shirts. Past that though, we'd have no control over how many they sold or what happened to them next, so if they sat in a warehouse like all those crates at the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark gathering dust, then that wouldn't be our fault, surely?Brilliant. Fancy dropping a line to Wes and Nas?
Here's an idea. We're miles behind on the other top 6 teams for commercial revenue, but all deals have to be on commercial terms to satisfy the Premier League/UEFA. What would happen if say, an entirely unconnected Egyptian company (choosing a territory *completely* at random) was to buy £50m of shirts from us, for selling on in Africa and the middle east. Obviously they'd have to pay the going rate for the shirts. Past that though, we'd have no control over how many they sold or what happened to them next, so if they sat in a warehouse like all those crates at the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark gathering dust, then that wouldn't be our fault, surely?
Just thought that extending the financial year to end of June means they may be able to include more revenue that they get from the Foo Fighters singalong that month.
The thing about the 3 year rolling average... How can Forest be in trouble if they haven't been in the PL for three years yet?
Roughly, I can make out our P&S figures being2023 -£96.7m2022 +£20.7m2021 -£22.8m *I couldn't see the Women's team figure for 2021 in the reports so this is likely higher by at least £1m I'd say.So that's -£98m across the 3 years, well within the £105m, even without the covid figure.As we all thought, the issue is this year started off at -£76m - meaning we can only lose £29m this year.We haven't done that in transfers thanks to the money from selling the younglings. So the risk is to do with how much revenue we've gone up by compared to how much we're paying on player salaries.I'm pretty confident there isn't a huge issue at all.
I'd love to know how our merch and replica kits etc are selling this year since the new President of Business basically came out last summer and said our new crest is horrible?
Man City's is just such a fucking obvious fiddle.
I'm not sure about all this inflation and FFP thing.The big issue with FFP is buying players and paying them. Yes, stadium costs and paying catering staff and kit washers and retail people and everything goes up with inflation, but nobody is paying players more wages simply because the cost of the weekly shop has gone up £50. And Eric and Tina's wage for slowly selling pies and pints every other week are not tipping clubs into the abyss.Raising the limit will just mean higher transfer fees and higher wages to soak it all up again and we're back where we started.
https://x.com/mattburton72/status/1765338645903347726?s=20Nice thread and some calculations there...