collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Other Games 2025-26 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 10:10:51 AM]


Pre season 2025 by Bosco81
[Today at 10:10:30 AM]


Kits 25/26 by PhilVill
[Today at 09:47:28 AM]


Europa League 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:34:03 AM]


Leander Dendoncker by eamonn
[Today at 09:24:48 AM]


Lucas Digne by Monty
[Today at 08:09:03 AM]


Boxing 2025 by Drummond
[Today at 07:55:37 AM]


Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by Villan For Life
[Today at 07:47:22 AM]

Recent Posts

Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 10:10:51 AM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Bosco81
[Today at 10:10:30 AM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by martin o`who??
[Today at 10:09:28 AM]


Re: Kits 25/26 by PhilVill
[Today at 09:47:28 AM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by PhilVill
[Today at 09:44:13 AM]


Re: Europa League 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:34:03 AM]


Re: Europa League 2025-26 by AV82EC
[Today at 09:28:56 AM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker by eamonn
[Today at 09:24:48 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: FFP  (Read 497241 times)

Offline VillaTim

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12590
  • Location: The Co-op, Inveraray.
  • GM : 04.12.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #1395 on: March 06, 2024, 02:38:24 PM »
This is from The Times and illustrates the challenge trying to compete….

Highest wage bills in the Premier League
2022-23 season. Starred is 21/22 season.
Man City (59% of turnover)
£422.9m
Liverpool (62%)
£373m
Chelsea (71%)*
£340m
Man Utd (51%)
£331.4m
Arsenal (51%)
£234.7m
Tottenham (47%)*
£209m
Aston Villa (89%)
£194.2m
Newcastle (75%)
£186m

Sorry to go back a couple of pages, but this really highlights the financial gap between the so called 'big six'.  The fact that Manchester City can have such a massive wage bill and for it to be such a relatively small percentage of their turnover (compared to others) is sobering really.
looks more like a BIG4 to me then there's a gap.

Offline Dogtanian

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7584
  • Location: The Streets of Rage ( Tamworth )
  • GM : 06.06.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #1396 on: March 06, 2024, 02:46:04 PM »
Just thought that extending the financial year to end of June means they may be able to include more revenue that they get from the Foo Fighters singalong that month.

Online Proposition Joe

  • Member
  • Posts: 4461
  • Location: Munich
Re: FFP
« Reply #1397 on: March 06, 2024, 02:46:27 PM »
The thing about the 3 year rolling average... How can Forest be in trouble if they haven't been in the PL for three years yet?

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #1398 on: March 06, 2024, 02:48:59 PM »
Here's an idea. We're miles behind on the other top 6 teams for commercial revenue, but all deals have to be on commercial terms to satisfy the Premier League/UEFA. What would happen if say, an entirely unconnected Egyptian company (choosing a territory *completely* at random) was to buy £50m of shirts from us, for selling on in Africa and the middle east. Obviously they'd have to pay the going rate for the shirts. Past that though, we'd have no control over how many they sold or what happened to them next, so if they sat in a warehouse like all those crates at the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark gathering dust, then that wouldn't be our fault, surely?
Brilliant. Fancy dropping a line to Wes and Nas?

I will do, once I've finalised my idea of how to make it seem like a 3rd division Spanish club can afford to buy Coutinho and Duran for £50m. Also, we auction a special Golden Seat next to Unai in the dugout, starting bid £20m a year. I could see the winner being somebody called Des Ewens.

Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47448
  • GM : 25.07.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #1399 on: March 06, 2024, 02:49:10 PM »
Just thought that extending the financial year to end of June means they may be able to include more revenue that they get from the Foo Fighters singalong that month.

Or give us an extra month to accrue more losses. :(

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #1400 on: March 06, 2024, 02:50:01 PM »
The thing about the 3 year rolling average... How can Forest be in trouble if they haven't been in the PL for three years yet?

There are rules for promoted teams that are a mix of the EPL and PL rules.

Offline claret+blue ed

  • Member
  • Posts: 301
  • Age: 48
  • Location: Barton on Humber
Re: FFP
« Reply #1401 on: March 06, 2024, 02:54:01 PM »
Roughly, I can make out our P&S figures being

2023 -£96.7m
2022 +£20.7m
2021 -£22.8m   *I couldn't see the Women's team figure for 2021 in the reports so this is likely higher by at least £1m I'd say.

So that's -£98m across the 3 years, well within the £105m, even without the covid figure.

As we all thought, the issue is this year started off at -£76m - meaning we can only lose £29m this year.

We haven't done that in transfers thanks to the money from selling the younglings. So the risk is to do with how much revenue we've gone up by compared to how much we're paying on player salaries.

I'm pretty confident there isn't a huge issue at all.

This what i mentioned earlier, the 2022 figure everyone was mentioning was a £300k profit, but that was surely without any FFP allowable costs taken off, so it would actually show as more profit

Offline OCD

  • Member
  • Posts: 34049
  • Location: Stuck in the middle with you
    • http://www.rightconsultant.com
  • GM : May, 2012
Re: FFP
« Reply #1402 on: March 06, 2024, 03:07:25 PM »
Roughly, I can make out our P&S figures being

2023 -£96.7m
2022 +£20.7m
2021 -£22.8m   *I couldn't see the Women's team figure for 2021 in the reports so this is likely higher by at least £1m I'd say.

So that's -£98m across the 3 years, well within the £105m, even without the covid figure.

As we all thought, the issue is this year started off at -£76m - meaning we can only lose £29m this year.

We haven't done that in transfers thanks to the money from selling the younglings. So the risk is to do with how much revenue we've gone up by compared to how much we're paying on player salaries.

I'm pretty confident there isn't a huge issue at all.


This is my thinking too.

The women's team has been set-up as a different company.

Offline Villan82

  • Member
  • Posts: 4224
Re: FFP
« Reply #1403 on: March 06, 2024, 03:13:31 PM »
I'd love to know how our merch and replica kits etc are selling this year since the new President of Business basically came out last summer and said our new crest is horrible?

Offline Drummond

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 32859
  • Location: Everywhere, and nowhere.
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #1404 on: March 06, 2024, 03:15:42 PM »
I'd love to know how our merch and replica kits etc are selling this year since the new President of Business basically came out last summer and said our new crest is horrible?

The kids kits seems to be selling well, given the lack of stock in the club shop on matchdays. There's a really big sale of all the other stuff though.

I'm not sure it's just the crest thing either, Castore are getting binned too, so that will hold people back.

Online Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29187
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: FFP
« Reply #1405 on: March 06, 2024, 03:26:12 PM »
Man City's is just such a fucking obvious fiddle.

Offline darren woolley

  • Member
  • Posts: 36259
  • Location: London
  • GM : 12.12.2024
Re: FFP
« Reply #1406 on: March 06, 2024, 04:01:29 PM »
Man City's is just such a fucking obvious fiddle.

I agree with you.

Offline SamTheMouse

  • Member
  • Posts: 11135
  • Location: The Land of the Fragrant Founders of Human Rights, Fine Wines & Bikinis
  • GM : 03.11.2024
Re: FFP
« Reply #1407 on: March 06, 2024, 04:03:51 PM »
Man City's is just such a fucking obvious fiddle.

It's the Trump approach. If you break the rules egregiously enough and lie brazenly enough, it just stuns everyone into submission.

It's basically a superpower.

Offline algy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6094
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Gogledd Cymru
  • GM : 26.03.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #1408 on: March 06, 2024, 05:59:51 PM »
I'm not sure about all this inflation and FFP thing.

The big issue with FFP is buying players and paying them. Yes, stadium costs and paying catering staff and kit washers and retail people and everything goes up with inflation, but nobody is paying players more wages simply because the cost of the weekly shop has gone up £50. And Eric and Tina's wage for slowly selling pies and pints every other week are not tipping clubs into the abyss.

Raising the limit will just mean higher transfer fees and higher wages to soak it all up again and we're back where we started.
Agree 100% with this.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15416
Re: FFP
« Reply #1409 on: March 06, 2024, 07:36:21 PM »
https://x.com/mattburton72/status/1765338645903347726?s=20

Nice thread and some calculations there...

Figures may not be exact, but that is about right isn't it?   Looks like it could be very tight this year, but it's the following year (24/25 season) that could see trouble. 

That £120m loss (even though it will be reduced for FFP purposes) is going to prove problematic isn't it, as it will be counted for another couple of years?
« Last Edit: March 06, 2024, 07:42:23 PM by tomd2103 »

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal