Quote from: Brazilian Villain on November 18, 2023, 06:34:16 PMQuote from: VillaTim on November 18, 2023, 06:02:59 PMQuote from: Chris Harte on November 18, 2023, 05:54:57 PMDon't they give their new signings eight year contracts so they can spread the payments over the same period?Just sounds like accountants fudging the books , in a similar vein to the way large corporations employ aggressive tax avoidance tacticsI've yet to meet anyone who asked me to arrange it for them to pay more tax.I've yet to meet anyone who's asked for less public services when they're in need of them. Not that I think Chelsea are fudging the books with their eight-year deals.
Quote from: VillaTim on November 18, 2023, 06:02:59 PMQuote from: Chris Harte on November 18, 2023, 05:54:57 PMDon't they give their new signings eight year contracts so they can spread the payments over the same period?Just sounds like accountants fudging the books , in a similar vein to the way large corporations employ aggressive tax avoidance tacticsI've yet to meet anyone who asked me to arrange it for them to pay more tax.
Quote from: Chris Harte on November 18, 2023, 05:54:57 PMDon't they give their new signings eight year contracts so they can spread the payments over the same period?Just sounds like accountants fudging the books , in a similar vein to the way large corporations employ aggressive tax avoidance tactics
Don't they give their new signings eight year contracts so they can spread the payments over the same period?
Quote from: Brazilian Villain on November 18, 2023, 06:34:16 PMQuote from: VillaTim on November 18, 2023, 06:02:59 PMQuote from: Chris Harte on November 18, 2023, 05:54:57 PMDon't they give their new signings eight year contracts so they can spread the payments over the same period?Just sounds like accountants fudging the books , in a similar vein to the way large corporations employ aggressive tax avoidance tacticsI've yet to meet anyone who asked me to arrange it for them to pay more tax.I've yet to meet anyone who's asked for less public services when they're in need of them.
clapQuote from: Brazilian Villain on November 18, 2023, 06:34:16 PMQuote from: VillaTim on November 18, 2023, 06:02:59 PMQuote from: Chris Harte on November 18, 2023, 05:54:57 PMDon't they give their new signings eight year contracts so they can spread the payments over the same period?Just sounds like accountants fudging the books , in a similar vein to the way large corporations employ aggressive tax avoidance tacticsI've yet to meet anyone who asked me to arrange it for them to pay more tax.I've yet to meet anyone who's asked for less public services when they're in need of them. Not that I think Chelsea are fudging the books with their eight-year deals.
How much did they pay for Mudryk? if ever there was an overated player it's him.
This is a wow moment ten points for Everton how much for City or Chelsea if they are found guilty.
Quote from: darren woolley on November 19, 2023, 12:06:29 AMThis is a wow moment ten points for Everton how much for City or Chelsea if they are found guilty.Everton were about £10m the wrong side and lost 10pts. Fully expect Man City to be deducted 350pts so that it's proportional ....
Quote from: algy on November 19, 2023, 08:01:03 AMQuote from: darren woolley on November 19, 2023, 12:06:29 AMThis is a wow moment ten points for Everton how much for City or Chelsea if they are found guilty.Everton were about £10m the wrong side and lost 10pts. Fully expect Man City to be deducted 350pts so that it's proportional ....I think I heard that guy Garyth is linking to above (the link doesn’t work for me btw), talking about how much certain owners pumped into clubs over the last ten years. The Everton guy (Moshiri?) spaffed £600m on Everton while Mansoor spent £500m on Man Cheaty.Highlights the importance of spending wisely I suppose, although no doubt MC were cheating like fuck throughout.
If shown to be guilty, the only sanctions that would have any effect on Manchester City or Chelsea would be a really long European ban (5 years-plus), multiple relegations or a multi-season Premier League ban. All of which would be fun but probably legally unenforceable. Unless it's 10 points for every season or breach.Even so, they'd have to dock Man City 60 points for them to be even close to a relegation fight.