collapse collapse

* - On Sale NOW -

Claret Blue and Green

The story of Aston Villa’s Irish connection

£9.99 plus postage

For ROW Postage please email iotp@heroespublishing.net

Postal Location

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Villa Park Redevelopment  (Read 1600253 times)

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 79204
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2027
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12960 on: Today at 12:14:01 PM »
We spent loads of money when Di Matteo was manager. Bruce's expenditure was not particularly outlandish by Championship standards. The football had mainly been shit for six years before he arrived. Nobody expected us to start playing like 1970 Brazil when he turned up, he was appointed to stabilise the club and reverse the culture of losing, and that's what he did.
« Last Edit: Today at 12:16:18 PM by cdbearsfan »

Online Mellin

  • Member
  • Posts: 3554
  • Age: 38
  • Location: Leicestershire
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12961 on: Today at 12:15:01 PM »
Bruce was certainly a better appointment for where we were than Di Matteo. I’d be surprised if anyone who was at Reading away would think he should be disrespected with a cabbage statue. His signings were predominantly positive, not scattergun. He was dealing with the mess created by Di Matteo and Xia.

I’d need to check who signed who but didn’t he just sign all the championship goal scorers without thought of how we use them, or effective use of them sometimes?
My feeling was Brucie stopped the drooping like a stone, but never before have I refused to go out of the pain of the football.
It’s a bit like what Emery did to Gerard, Smith did to Bruce. End of story.

It's more like what Gerrard did to Smith and what Bruce did to Di Matteo.

As for the post above blaming him for finishing 13th. Fucking lol.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 82952
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12962 on: Today at 12:15:54 PM »
He was still managing those very expensive players and that few, if any, other second tier club buy, and being better than RDM is the lowest of low bars.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 79204
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2027
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12963 on: Today at 12:18:42 PM »
I wasn't suggesting being better than Di Matteo was anything to write home about. But john e suggested we played the worst football he had ever seen under Bruce and I was rebutting that assertion, on the basis that you only have to travel back one manager to do so.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 82952
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12964 on: Today at 12:22:10 PM »
It was shit in relation to our resources though. Our far better players meant it was still good enough to beat the likes of Burton and Rotherham on a pretty regular basis.

Online olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 46195
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 13.12.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12965 on: Today at 12:25:16 PM »
So how does all this fix the no water in the North Stand toilets problem?

Online garyellis

  • Member
  • Posts: 1768
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12966 on: Today at 12:25:34 PM »
Fuck me is this the Steve Bruce thread in disguise?

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 79204
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2027
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12967 on: Today at 12:26:25 PM »
Maybe. It wasn't shitter than Di Matteo, though, so john e was incorrect. And it quite often takes time to stabilise a club in free-fall, which we were before he arrived.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 82952
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Steve Bruce was cack
« Reply #12968 on: Today at 12:26:27 PM »
Yes.

Online Dogtanian

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7780
  • Location: The Streets of Rage ( Tamworth )
  • GM : 06.06.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12969 on: Today at 12:35:08 PM »
His ability and what he did or didn’t do is pretty much immaterial at this point. He failed and was replaced.

But I think he genuinely cared about the club, and genuinely tried his best whilst in the job.

And on that basis alone, he doesn’t deserve hatred, comparisons to vegetables, or statues built to mock him.

Should there be a turnip statue outside Wembley? How would we feel about that?

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 82952
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12970 on: Today at 12:37:32 PM »
He's already got a statue


Online olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 46195
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 13.12.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12971 on: Today at 12:37:33 PM »
But what about the queue for drinks in the North Stand?

Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 57185
  • GM : 25.07.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12972 on: Today at 12:38:25 PM »
I wouldn't change a thing since the defeat to Fulham (apart from signing Ross McCormack and Scott Hogan maybe). In another timeline, we could be languishing in mid-table under Eddie Howe, and the North Stand wouldn't need to be redeveloped.

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 25924
  • Location: Salop
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12973 on: Today at 12:40:51 PM »
I don’t understand why stabilising us as a mid-table division two side is seen as a positive.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal