collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

FFP by aev
[Today at 03:53:16 PM]


Wolves vs Aston Villa Pre-Match Thread by Monty
[Today at 03:51:50 PM]


Kits 25/26 by eamonn
[Today at 03:43:49 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Des Little
[Today at 03:39:30 PM]


The cycling thread by simon ward 50
[Today at 02:37:47 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by cdbearsfan
[Today at 02:14:50 PM]


GUESS THE GOAL R20: Wolves v VILLA Friday 27Th February 🥅 by Rotterdam 82
[Today at 02:08:21 PM]


Other Villa stuff by TheToffnar
[Today at 02:03:01 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: FFP by aev
[Today at 03:53:16 PM]


Re: FFP by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 03:52:20 PM]


Re: FFP by aev
[Today at 03:52:11 PM]


Re: Wolves vs Aston Villa Pre-Match Thread by Monty
[Today at 03:51:50 PM]


Re: FFP by Crown Hill
[Today at 03:49:59 PM]


Re: Wolves vs Aston Villa Pre-Match Thread by adrenachrome
[Today at 03:47:09 PM]


Re: FFP by TheToffnar
[Today at 03:46:55 PM]


Re: Kits 25/26 by eamonn
[Today at 03:43:49 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Villa Park Redevelopment  (Read 1445418 times)

Online Duncan Shaw

  • Member
  • Posts: 3875
  • Location: Epsom, Surrey
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12330 on: Today at 12:57:07 PM »
Thanks for posting Tuscans, I won't quote your post, as the article is pretty long, but referring to it, it was pretty much forever thus in the 50 years I have been going.  Doing well, front foot football, the place rocks - form drops off, team looks nervous, we get nervous, the place can be like a library, where you hear all the tension in the crowd.

But sometimes we recognise they need help and the place rocks again, but that didn't really happen on Saturday.

Offline Nev

  • Member
  • Posts: 16481
  • Location: Vibrania
  • GM : 03.02.2022
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12331 on: Today at 01:17:40 PM »
Sunday games.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 77066
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2027
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12332 on: Today at 01:28:42 PM »
Yep. They're shit. Also, have noticed a little pocket of fans in Lower Holte have recently started slagging off other supporters for not singing enough. This makes me much less inclined to do so, they can fuck off with that "pay attention to me" shit.

Online TheToffnar

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: Who knows, I rent...
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12333 on: Today at 01:59:17 PM »
It's an argument I'm bored to death of hearing, in all honesty.

We don't play tub thumping football most of the time. It's as simple as that to me. This is the English way where rightly or wrongly you have to earn the support of the fans for the majority of matches played at home. One of my mates is an Everton season ticket holder and it's exactly the same there.

Though I appreciate all the brilliant moments this teams given me and I would never personally get at him in the stands for it, Konsa gesturing to the fans really boiled my blood. If you want blind vocal allegiance, go play in Germany. If you want the highs of us singing our hearts out when we're on a good run and performing well, you have to deal with us at our worst. It doesn't mean any more or less to us, the only difference is we're not paid to be there.

If we'd have gone on to equalize or win pussy footing at the back, he'd have been proved correct and none of us would be discussing his actions, but we only looked dangerous when we leapt at them and went for the throat.
« Last Edit: Today at 02:08:37 PM by TheToffnar »

Offline VILLA MOLE

  • Member
  • Posts: 8899
  • Age: 51
  • Location: STRATFORD UPON AVON
  • a v f c
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12334 on: Today at 02:08:44 PM »
Yep. They're shit. Also, have noticed a little pocket of fans in Lower Holte have recently started slagging off other supporters for not singing enough. This makes me much less inclined to do so, they can fuck off with that "pay attention to me" shit.


Yes I dont get that .  I get so nervous sometimes i can barely speak , where my son doesnt shut up , we are all different

Online Duncan Shaw

  • Member
  • Posts: 3875
  • Location: Epsom, Surrey
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12335 on: Today at 02:22:40 PM »
Sunday games.

But Leeds was Saturday, 3pm

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 80670
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12336 on: Today at 02:38:07 PM »
Pricing is a big reason imo. Loads have been priced out of games, replaced by folks that are probably less inclined to sing. Because of pricing the average age at VP is probably a fair bit higher these days. And if you've shelled out a ridiculous £70+ for a league game vs Leeds then it's human nature to expect to be entertained rather than it being on you.
Fans always have been, and always will be, reactive. And how we tend to play while obviously proving pretty damn effective is hardly the rip roaring exciting football that tends to crank up the crowd.

Offline Nev

  • Member
  • Posts: 16481
  • Location: Vibrania
  • GM : 03.02.2022
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12337 on: Today at 02:42:45 PM »
Sunday games.

But Leeds was Saturday, 3pm

That's one game, when we're in a poor run and didn't play particularly well. The article was about the general lack of atmosphere and from a personal point of view I hate Sunday games. On a Sat you have the rest of the weekend ahead, a night out possibly, for most no work the next day and Sat always has an optimistic air as opposed to Sundays that tend to be a drag whatever you're doing. Win on a Sat and you can have great night, win on a Sunday and you can celebrate by making your lunch for work the next day, iron the school uniform for the kids or even enjoy the thrill of Sunday on BBC1 by watching Call The Fucking Midwife or Antiques Bastarding Roadshow.

Offline Ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 31351
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 20.01.2027
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12338 on: Today at 02:43:10 PM »
Pricing is a big reason imo. Loads have been priced out of games, replaced by folks that are probably less inclined to sing. Because of pricing the average age at VP is probably a fair bit higher these days. And if you've shelled out a ridiculous £70+ for a league game vs Leeds then it's human nature to expect to be entertained rather than it being on you.
Fans always have been, and always will be, reactive. And how we tend to play while obviously proving pretty damn effective is hardly the rip roaring exciting football that tends to crank up the crowd.

McGinn is a big reason in the last few games. For all the debate on his place, he's invariably the man that does something to stir the crowd. We're much less entertaining without him in the side.

Online TheToffnar

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: Who knows, I rent...
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12339 on: Today at 02:44:06 PM »
Such a good point and one I'd not considered.

Offline Des Little

  • Member
  • Posts: 12973
  • Location: A5 Ultra
  • GM : 03.05.2021
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12340 on: Today at 02:44:54 PM »
Financials aside, the massive benefit of qualifying for UCL is the end of the shit Sunday fixtures, for a season at least.

Online Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36636
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12341 on: Today at 02:45:26 PM »
It's an argument I'm bored to death of hearing, in all honesty.

We don't play tub thumping football most of the time. It's as simple as that to me. This is the English way where rightly or wrongly you have to earn the support of the fans for the majority of matches played at home. One of my mates is an Everton season ticket holder and it's exactly the same there.

Though I appreciate all the brilliant moments this teams given me and I would never personally get at him in the stands for it, Konsa gesturing to the fans really boiled my blood. If you want blind vocal allegiance, go play in Germany. If you want the highs of us singing our hearts out when we're on a good run and performing well, you have to deal with us at our worst. It doesn't mean any more or less to us, the only difference is we're not paid to be there.

If we'd have gone on to equalize or win pussy footing at the back, he'd have been proved correct and none of us would be discussing his actions, but we only looked dangerous when we leapt at them and went for the throat.

I think the reason you get players trying to gee up supporters is it genuinely helps lift performances but they have to understand that the flip side is that when they’re struggling it makes the crowd edgy.

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36400
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12342 on: Today at 02:52:18 PM »
Financials aside, the massive benefit of qualifying for UCL is the end of the shit Sunday fixtures, for a season at least.

Whilst it probably isn't worth as much as CL money, Sky now showing every Sunday game has probably added more money to the coffers then we would have got the other season with all the Sunday games.

Online TheToffnar

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: Who knows, I rent...
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12343 on: Today at 03:03:03 PM »
It's an argument I'm bored to death of hearing, in all honesty.

We don't play tub thumping football most of the time. It's as simple as that to me. This is the English way where rightly or wrongly you have to earn the support of the fans for the majority of matches played at home. One of my mates is an Everton season ticket holder and it's exactly the same there.

Though I appreciate all the brilliant moments this teams given me and I would never personally get at him in the stands for it, Konsa gesturing to the fans really boiled my blood. If you want blind vocal allegiance, go play in Germany. If you want the highs of us singing our hearts out when we're on a good run and performing well, you have to deal with us at our worst. It doesn't mean any more or less to us, the only difference is we're not paid to be there.

If we'd have gone on to equalize or win pussy footing at the back, he'd have been proved correct and none of us would be discussing his actions, but we only looked dangerous when we leapt at them and went for the throat.

I think the reason you get players trying to gee up supporters is it genuinely helps lift performances but they have to understand that the flip side is that when they’re struggling it makes the crowd edgy.

Got absolutely no issue with them trying to gee is up, but telling us to calm down is something else entirely.

Amazing how reversing the hand gesture can make such a difference, thinking about it...

Online Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18985
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 17.02.2027
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12344 on: Today at 03:21:39 PM »
Pricing is a big reason imo. Loads have been priced out of games, replaced by folks that are probably less inclined to sing. Because of pricing the average age at VP is probably a fair bit higher these days. And if you've shelled out a ridiculous £70+ for a league game vs Leeds then it's human nature to expect to be entertained rather than it being on you.
Fans always have been, and always will be, reactive. And how we tend to play while obviously proving pretty damn effective is hardly the rip roaring exciting football that tends to crank up the crowd.
Linked to that is the influx of daytrippers and GA+ visitors who perhaps don't have the same level of enthusiasm for the team.
Also, one only has to go and read the pre-match thread on here to assess the general levels of pessimism amongst this part of the fanbase ... perhaps too many go to the ground expecting the worst!
As ever, it's a cocktail of issues.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal