collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Aston Villa v Manchester United 21.12.25 - Pre Match Thread by usav
[Today at 01:03:29 PM]


The NFL Thread (with added College Football) by usav
[Today at 12:50:04 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by AV82EC
[Today at 12:40:08 PM]


BBC SPOTY 2025 by cdbearsfan
[Today at 12:33:13 PM]


It's Our Year Vol. 69 ....FA Cup R3. Spurs (A) by London Villan
[Today at 12:32:34 PM]


Manchester United (H) Reference Required by eye digress
[Today at 12:02:06 PM]


Kits 25/26 by Drummond
[Today at 12:00:47 PM]


Ollie Watkins by eye digress
[Today at 11:45:04 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Villa Park Redevelopment  (Read 1347449 times)

Online Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 11026
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11790 on: December 13, 2025, 03:37:25 PM »
I can’t see it unless the Purlow stand fits better with the new financial rules.  Haven’t read them, but thought wages must be linked to turnover so cannot see how losing X,000 seats for a season would help that metric.
« Last Edit: December 13, 2025, 03:41:16 PM by Dante Lavelli »

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35429
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11791 on: December 13, 2025, 05:38:23 PM »
In theory losing x amount of fans is covered for financially as you are allowed (or used to be allowed) to include an average of the turnover of the developed area for the financials. However I think from a footballing perspective Emery likes having the fans all around the ground for home games.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 78909
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11792 on: December 13, 2025, 05:48:29 PM »
I've yet to see a rule that definitively covers that, and even if it does exist for the PL with how strict UEFA are I can't see them doing it. Might be why hardly anyone here does a complete stand rebuild these days unless it's the only option like Fulham.

Offline Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 52819
  • GM : 25.07.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11793 on: December 13, 2025, 05:51:44 PM »
In theory losing x amount of fans is covered for financially as you are allowed (or used to be allowed) to include an average of the turnover of the developed area for the financials.

Are we allowed to use FIFA prices when computing the average?

Offline Chris Harte

  • Member
  • Posts: 12549
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11794 on: December 13, 2025, 07:09:06 PM »
In theory losing x amount of fans is covered for financially as you are allowed (or used to be allowed) to include an average of the turnover of the developed area for the financials.

Are we allowed to use FIFA prices when computing the average?
That'd be good. We'd definitely have more revenue than those over at the Twelve Dildo stadium.

Offline Stu

  • Member
  • Posts: 14309
  • GM : 09.04.2021
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11795 on: December 13, 2025, 07:21:32 PM »
Misshapes?

We'd like to go to town but we can't risk it.

I’ll acknowledge this one even if no one else will.

Offline Chip Butty 111

  • Member
  • Posts: 982
  • Age: 57
  • Location: In the Chip Shop
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11796 on: December 14, 2025, 11:52:38 AM »
In theory losing x amount of fans is covered for financially as you are allowed (or used to be allowed) to include an average of the turnover of the developed area for the financials.

Are we allowed to use FIFA prices when computing the average?
...Chris Heck says hi 👋

Offline Villan82

  • Member
  • Posts: 4367
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11797 on: Today at 10:18:30 AM »
There isn't time to do the Purslow plan before the Euros is there?

We'd still have two full summers if we wanted, either way we haven't much time
The Purslow plan involves demolishing the stand. The whole idea of the current design is for the stand to remain open during construction therefore reducing the loss in revenue and not having to play hugely important games with a building site behind the goal instead of fans. This is what's happening there's no chance of them reverting to Purslow design.

It was Percy, above, who said there was a whisper of a change of plan.

Yes, I understand why we are doing what we're doing but what happens  if we discover during the work that the old structure is unsuitable? I seem to recall we had a plan in the 90s to raise the old Trinity roof and add a tier but that got scrapped late on.

All hypothetical at the moment but  snags do happen. For what it's worth, I think the Purslow stand was to contain new dressing rooms among other things so it isn't beyond the realms of possibility that they could build a more simple stand, such as the one consented to this year, from scratch if they had to and in a faster time-frame.

Offline ian c.

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3582
  • Location: Munich
  • GM : 20.06.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11798 on: Today at 11:28:32 AM »
Misshapes?

We'd like to go to town but we can't risk it.

I’ll acknowledge this one even if no one else will.

Indeed. Well played.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal