collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Villa Park Redevelopment by TonyD
[Today at 10:20:06 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by Beard82
[Today at 10:04:34 PM]


Boxing 2025 by dave.woodhall
[Today at 09:36:30 PM]


Other Villa stuff by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:22:24 PM]


Ramón Rodríguez Verdejo (AKA Monchi) by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 09:20:32 PM]


Games Moved for TV by Sdwbvf
[Today at 09:03:19 PM]


Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by paul_e
[Today at 08:46:45 PM]


Kits 25/26 by eamonn
[Today at 08:02:39 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by TonyD
[Today at 10:20:06 PM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Beard82
[Today at 10:17:37 PM]


Re: The International Cricket Thread by Beard82
[Today at 10:04:34 PM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by TonyD
[Today at 10:00:41 PM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Villan82
[Today at 09:51:32 PM]


Re: Boxing 2025 by dave.woodhall
[Today at 09:36:30 PM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by TonyD
[Today at 09:34:12 PM]


Re: The International Cricket Thread by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 09:31:50 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Villa Park Redevelopment  (Read 1315544 times)

Offline Chip Butty 111

  • Member
  • Posts: 892
  • Age: 57
  • Location: In the Chip Shop
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11625 on: Today at 06:16:40 PM »
Fully expecting their next 3 signings to be Sooty & Sweep and Fred Dibnah. With those chimneys they'll be blowing smoke up their own backsides for years.

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 23877
  • Location: Salop
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11626 on: Today at 06:27:55 PM »
I think it's pretty cool. It suits them - and I mean this affectionately - in that it's a bit ugly and doesn't make a lot of sense. But, if it ends up looking like that, they'll have done well.

Offline SaddVillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 2464
  • Location: Saddleworth
  • 1000 ft up in the hills gazing down on Manchester
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11627 on: Today at 06:35:14 PM »
Will they play with a chimney sweeper?

Offline Border villan

  • Member
  • Posts: 1846
  • Location: Guarding Offa's Dyke.
  • Carrying out missionary work on the Welsh border.
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11628 on: Today at 06:46:33 PM »
With all the hot air coming from the Chim,chimneys landing aircraft at Elmdon Airdrome could be tricky.

Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 51722
  • GM : 25.07.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11629 on: Today at 07:23:05 PM »
How can we compete, when we have no chimneys.

It'll certainly help them attract Dutch star striker Dyck van Dyke

They're changing their nickname to the 'Flues'.

Offline DB

  • Member
  • Posts: 5700
  • Location: Absolute zero
  • GM : 11.01.2021
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11630 on: Today at 07:36:19 PM »
I've just deen the pictures......wtf, hahaha hahaha.

Offline Chip Butty 111

  • Member
  • Posts: 892
  • Age: 57
  • Location: In the Chip Shop
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11631 on: Today at 07:59:24 PM »
I've just deen the pictures......wtf, hahaha hahaha.
a poor mans Battersea Power Station...

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 34626
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11632 on: Today at 08:03:56 PM »
I haven't seen or heard 'owt about this, do you have to scroll down for more than 30 secs on the BBC football page to find the news?

Offline DB

  • Member
  • Posts: 5700
  • Location: Absolute zero
  • GM : 11.01.2021
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11633 on: Today at 08:06:50 PM »
I've just deen the pictures......wtf, hahaha hahaha.
a poor mans Battersea Power Station...

Fred Dibnah's wet dream.

Offline Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 10978
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11634 on: Today at 08:12:29 PM »
Birmingham is big enough for such a venue. I’m not wowed by the design but the I am by the ambition.  Someone spending £3bn in the area has to be a good thing.

Offline Chip Butty 111

  • Member
  • Posts: 892
  • Age: 57
  • Location: In the Chip Shop
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11635 on: Today at 08:13:58 PM »
I haven't seen or heard 'owt about this, do you have to scroll down for more than 30 secs on the BBC football page to find the news?
It made the BBC NEWS at 6pm, said they had regularly played in front of crowds of 60,000...showed some black and white footage of a game where everyone wore flat caps and smoked Woodbines, nearly pmsl...

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 78022
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11636 on: Today at 08:21:37 PM »
They had 60k+ for a few cup matches, never for a league match so that's bollocks if they said "regularly".

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74904
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11637 on: Today at 08:22:29 PM »
If you're including cup games at neutral venues and away matches it's probably accurate.

Offline SaddVillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 2464
  • Location: Saddleworth
  • 1000 ft up in the hills gazing down on Manchester
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11638 on: Today at 08:35:46 PM »
Input in the design has come from Heatherwick Studios.

They and their head Thomas Heatherwick have been responsible for: these design successes:

London's Boris Buses -  poor ventilation, overheating in summer and failure of the hop on hop off  open platform feature. Withdrawn from service.

The  B of the Bang Commonwealth Games sculpture in Manchester. Spikes kept falling off and it ended up being dismantled

London's Garden Bridge across the Thames that was never built, but cost £53m.

The Vessel (New York City): A 16-story, honeycomb-like structure at Hudson Yards. After four people died by suicide at the structure, it was closed indefinitely.

A marriage made in heaven?

Online TonyD

  • Member
  • Posts: 10524
  • Location: Outside the box
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11639 on: Today at 09:34:12 PM »
A lot of our supporters are entranced by the thought of something new and shiny, plus the belief that you 'have' to move to compete. It falls at the first bit of logical thinking behind the first question - where to?

I've never been overly keen on a move.  But if Blues stopped at the first hurdle of 'where to?' they wouldn't be announcing their mega-dome right now.  Which, as much as we will take the piss, will bring in income streams that will transform their club.

It's not our job to come up with the answer to 'where to?' but opportunities have come and gone.  The ideal solution would have been to secure land near the HS2 terminal, which would have made the club a viable destination for London tourists and the hospitality income that seems to be the only way to compete in the current football landscape, but that was too early in our recovery to be viable.  But the likes of the gas holder site etc could have worked.

I don't think 'where to?' was a hurdle that should have stopped us.

But perhaps 'should we?' was the more relevant question.     
I agree.  As much as it pains me you have to admire their ambition.
We should find a plot close enough to the city centre that’s walkable and build a 4 stand red brick ground with a massive single tier Holte. 

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal