collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Villa Park Redevelopment by olaftab
[Today at 11:01:38 PM]


We're on the stroll with - Brentford away by villa for life
[Today at 10:40:51 PM]


Unai Emery by andyh
[Today at 10:24:36 PM]


Boxing 2025 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 10:17:17 PM]


Brentford vs Aston Villa LC Rd3 - pre match chat by passport1
[Today at 09:13:05 PM]


Athletics 2025 by Exeter 77
[Today at 08:49:57 PM]


GUESS THE GOAL R3: Carabao🏆 Brentford v VILLA, Tuesday 16th September!🥅 by mjlions
[Today at 07:59:32 PM]


Victor Lindelöf - done by Louzie0
[Today at 07:14:43 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Villa Park Redevelopment  (Read 1209206 times)

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37456
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11145 on: September 13, 2025, 11:00:15 AM »
There's a good point made on that forum Percy linked to - for its size, Villa Park doesn't hold as many as it should. It's badly configured and you should be able to do a lot more both in terms of capacity and facilities.

Which is what Heck meant by 'bowl optimisation'. I think the talk at the time was that there could be as many as 1500-2000 extra seats without reducing spacing or any major structural changes, and then another 1000 or so by converting the trinity to 2 tiers. Some of that work has been done already but I reckon it'll all happen by the time the north is finished.

Online algy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6207
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Gogledd Cymru
  • GM : 26.03.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11146 on: September 13, 2025, 01:28:53 PM »
Well it sounds like by the end of the improvements we’ll have a 52.5k capacity ground, which is closer to what they were saying on that forum should be the right capacity for the size of the stadium.

Online Crown Hill

  • Member
  • Posts: 267
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11147 on: September 13, 2025, 07:24:53 PM »
Villa Park’s issue has always been it is constrained by Trinity Road and Witton Lane like a pair of tweezers. Until that’s addressed expansion is very difficult. And I love my view there but the Witton Lane Stand really isn’t fit for purpose.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35855
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11148 on: September 13, 2025, 08:00:58 PM »
Villa Park’s issue has always been it is constrained by Trinity Road and Witton Lane like a pair of tweezers. Until that’s addressed expansion is very difficult. And I love my view there but the Witton Lane Stand really isn’t fit for purpose.

Yes. Our number one (avoidable) problem was, for the room we’ve got there, the North Stand capacity was pathetic. That’s solved. The unavoidable problem we’ve got is Witton Lane. I suppose we should plan for it, but let’s see if 52k is enough before we do it.

Online Gareth

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7156
  • Age: 50
  • Location: Redditch
  • GM : 25.02.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11149 on: September 13, 2025, 10:23:38 PM »
Villa Park’s issue has always been it is constrained by Trinity Road and Witton Lane like a pair of tweezers. Until that’s addressed expansion is very difficult. And I love my view there but the Witton Lane Stand really isn’t fit for purpose.

I agree, the view, 2nd row Upper Tier is fantastic but it is the only thing going for that stand…concourse space is awful, food & drink service is garbage but could be fixed if they wanted to and the toilet numbers and quality are woeful, particularly for the ladies who have 5 cubicles in the whole tier

Offline Chris Harte

  • Member
  • Posts: 12327
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11150 on: September 14, 2025, 12:42:02 PM »
Villa Park’s issue has always been it is constrained by Trinity Road and Witton Lane like a pair of tweezers. Until that’s addressed expansion is very difficult. And I love my view there but the Witton Lane Stand really isn’t fit for purpose.
I'm sure Witton Lane was moved when they built the upper tier in the nineties, so it could be moved again. There are bigger obstacles to expanding that side of the ground.

Online Crown Hill

  • Member
  • Posts: 267
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11151 on: September 14, 2025, 04:25:39 PM »
Villa Park’s issue has always been it is constrained by Trinity Road and Witton Lane like a pair of tweezers. Until that’s addressed expansion is very difficult. And I love my view there but the Witton Lane Stand really isn’t fit for purpose.
I'm sure Witton Lane was moved when they built the upper tier in the nineties, so it could be moved again. There are bigger obstacles to expanding that side of the ground.

Only slightly. Just enough for a narrow upper tier built at Jewson. The road was moved very slightly and a garden built where the council houses had stood.

As I say Villa park's biggest problem  - still - is that Trinity Road and Witton Lane grip it like a pair of tweezers and that's caused the issues with the two corners of the Holte End. It was why the terraced Holte End and 1920s Trinity Road Stand were built in the way and the shape they were.

Pedestrianise Trinity Road might be one solution but the bigger issue remains Witton Lane and to even basically make it fit for purpose will require purchases of the houses across from the garden and a major transport plan.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2025, 04:27:59 PM by Crown Hill »

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33817
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11152 on: September 14, 2025, 04:43:01 PM »
They would need to do something with Witton island before they could think about pedestrianising Trinity full time.

Offline chrisw1

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10099
  • GM : 21.08.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11153 on: Today at 02:40:31 PM »
Villa Park’s issue has always been it is constrained by Trinity Road and Witton Lane like a pair of tweezers. Until that’s addressed expansion is very difficult. And I love my view there but the Witton Lane Stand really isn’t fit for purpose.

Yes. Our number one (avoidable) problem was, for the room we’ve got there, the North Stand capacity was pathetic. That’s solved. The unavoidable problem we’ve got is Witton Lane. I suppose we should plan for it, but let’s see if 52k is enough before we do it.

It's being improved but not really solved.  We had one opportunity to rebuild a stand unfettered by land constraints, but have chosen to extend it instead.  If we wanted to maximise capacity, we'd be building something equivalent to the Anfield Road stand, which would have added an extra 4-5k more than the current plan.

Our capacity will be topping out at 50k + a bit of bowl optimisation for the next decade at least.  It just feels like a wasted opportunity to me.  And even following completion of the refurb, a rebuild of that stand will still be the most viable route for any further ground expansion if required.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • Posts: 74875
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11154 on: Today at 07:35:45 PM »
But the Purslow plans for the North Stand were pretty much the same size as this version of it, the major difference is that it doesn't mean closing one end of the ground for at least a couple of seasons.

Online algy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6207
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Gogledd Cymru
  • GM : 26.03.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11155 on: Today at 08:07:48 PM »
But the Purslow plans for the North Stand were pretty much the same size as this version of it, the major difference is that it doesn't mean closing one end of the ground for at least a couple of seasons.
The Purslow plans also relied iirc on lots of GA+ seating, and personally I’d rather keep the number of those seats under control.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35855
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11156 on: Today at 08:16:18 PM »
But the Purslow plans for the North Stand were pretty much the same size as this version of it, the major difference is that it doesn't mean closing one end of the ground for at least a couple of seasons.

Exactly.

I think this is part of the process of finding out what the potential support is on our current site. If there’s untapped demand after we get to 50k plus then there’s another plan to be made. I think if we were going to 60k in the next couple of years we’d have to reduce prices to fill it for many games, and financially speaking, what’s the point of that? Even at 50k, I reckon they’ll sell season tickets to everyone who wants one.

Did Everton sell out on Saturday?
« Last Edit: Today at 08:20:13 PM by Percy McCarthy »

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 43233
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11157 on: Today at 08:20:21 PM »
We'll have a ground bigger than Everton's and it will be miles easier to get in side the perimeter too.

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 34107
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11158 on: Today at 09:02:07 PM »
Max on Tour said it was a half hour walk from town and that he wasn't sure how Evertonians got there sooner without the faff of a taxi.

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 43233
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11159 on: Today at 09:10:27 PM »
Its not too far from Tithebarn Street where there's some decent pubs. That in turn is 5 minutes from the main touristy bit.

25 minute walk maybe. You've got Sandhills which is 1 stop from Moorfields which dissects Tithebarn and Dale Street.

Here endeth the Tourist guide.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal