Quote from: LeeS on June 06, 2025, 01:02:22 PMAt the risk of being told to put it on a different thread, I think it is remarkable that a new tram line is being promised for their new stadium and we can’t get a platform extension for ours. It's not for them. It's a line going a lot further, with a stop at the San Giro.
At the risk of being told to put it on a different thread, I think it is remarkable that a new tram line is being promised for their new stadium and we can’t get a platform extension for ours.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on June 06, 2025, 04:26:14 PMQuote from: ozzjim on June 06, 2025, 12:20:20 PMQuote from: chrisw1 on June 06, 2025, 11:02:38 AMI think it's relevant. Despite the sceptisism it looks like they will build what some thought we should have built.How successful they become remains to be seen, but I imagine Man U fans laughed at Man City a few years ago. Obviously pre PSR, but IF they do develop a multi use stadium, it's exactly the additional sort of income that puts such a huge gap between our PSR issues and the likes of Spurs.I'm glad we're sticking with VP, but honestly I don't think the North stand project is anywhere near ambitious enough, given it is our only opportunity to build a stand unfettered by land constraints. In fact, I don't think the Purslow design was ambitious enough either.I agree, the intent and vision stadium wise is what will allow them to move forward at pace if they realise it, and will have them competing on a different financial footing. The North Stand is a plus, but I agree, not ambitious enough. We need to be 60-65k plus a huge amount of significantly better corporate. The only caveat is that Spurs charge London prices, they won't fill a stadium in Birmingham on London prices.Honestly, struggling to believe this exchange. Why?We have the land for one ambitious stand. We're not utilising it to it's maximum. Is it that crazy a view to hold that a limited extension is not the best use of the space we have? A limited extension that will leave us 20-30% behind most the clubs we're hoping to compete against in terms of seats, before even looking at facilities?But of course anyone questioning the course the club is taking is panicking. I imagine we're bedwetting too in your mind?
Quote from: ozzjim on June 06, 2025, 12:20:20 PMQuote from: chrisw1 on June 06, 2025, 11:02:38 AMI think it's relevant. Despite the sceptisism it looks like they will build what some thought we should have built.How successful they become remains to be seen, but I imagine Man U fans laughed at Man City a few years ago. Obviously pre PSR, but IF they do develop a multi use stadium, it's exactly the additional sort of income that puts such a huge gap between our PSR issues and the likes of Spurs.I'm glad we're sticking with VP, but honestly I don't think the North stand project is anywhere near ambitious enough, given it is our only opportunity to build a stand unfettered by land constraints. In fact, I don't think the Purslow design was ambitious enough either.I agree, the intent and vision stadium wise is what will allow them to move forward at pace if they realise it, and will have them competing on a different financial footing. The North Stand is a plus, but I agree, not ambitious enough. We need to be 60-65k plus a huge amount of significantly better corporate. The only caveat is that Spurs charge London prices, they won't fill a stadium in Birmingham on London prices.Honestly, struggling to believe this exchange.
Quote from: chrisw1 on June 06, 2025, 11:02:38 AMI think it's relevant. Despite the sceptisism it looks like they will build what some thought we should have built.How successful they become remains to be seen, but I imagine Man U fans laughed at Man City a few years ago. Obviously pre PSR, but IF they do develop a multi use stadium, it's exactly the additional sort of income that puts such a huge gap between our PSR issues and the likes of Spurs.I'm glad we're sticking with VP, but honestly I don't think the North stand project is anywhere near ambitious enough, given it is our only opportunity to build a stand unfettered by land constraints. In fact, I don't think the Purslow design was ambitious enough either.I agree, the intent and vision stadium wise is what will allow them to move forward at pace if they realise it, and will have them competing on a different financial footing. The North Stand is a plus, but I agree, not ambitious enough. We need to be 60-65k plus a huge amount of significantly better corporate. The only caveat is that Spurs charge London prices, they won't fill a stadium in Birmingham on London prices.
I think it's relevant. Despite the sceptisism it looks like they will build what some thought we should have built.How successful they become remains to be seen, but I imagine Man U fans laughed at Man City a few years ago. Obviously pre PSR, but IF they do develop a multi use stadium, it's exactly the additional sort of income that puts such a huge gap between our PSR issues and the likes of Spurs.I'm glad we're sticking with VP, but honestly I don't think the North stand project is anywhere near ambitious enough, given it is our only opportunity to build a stand unfettered by land constraints. In fact, I don't think the Purslow design was ambitious enough either.
In the absence of any inkling of a grand new build for us then evolving Villa Park in gradual stages makes sense, 50k inside two years and the potential to then do something with the Witton Lane and the Holte in the coming 5-10 years seems do-able. Whether that gets us to 60k I’m not sure but we’ll be getting up to that sort of level.
You can see the sheets are piss wet through from here. Really poor behaviour.Christ, being quoted on Small Heath Alliance, amongst all the wank socks and crayons. Absolute low, pass Chris the Tena Lady now.
Quote from: Ads on June 06, 2025, 06:35:43 PMYou can see the sheets are piss wet through from here. Really poor behaviour.Christ, being quoted on Small Heath Alliance, amongst all the wank socks and crayons. Absolute low, pass Chris the Tena Lady now.Was she the one in the Mini with Peter Shilton?
Quote from: Ads on June 06, 2025, 06:35:43 PMYou can see the sheets are piss wet through from here. Really poor behaviour.Christ, being quoted on Small Heath Alliance, amongst all the wank socks and crayons. Absolute low, pass Chris the Tena Lady now.I don't know. I regard it as one of the highlights of my life.