collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by AV84
[Today at 01:19:50 PM]


Pre season 2025 by paul_e
[Today at 01:16:59 PM]


International Rugby by paul_e
[Today at 01:10:57 PM]


Kits 25/26 by AV84
[Today at 11:59:12 AM]


Tour de France 2025 by UK Redsox
[Today at 11:04:59 AM]


Louie Barry (on loan to Sheffield United) by dcdavecollett
[Today at 02:33:02 AM]


Games Moved for TV by Martyn Smith
[Today at 02:05:21 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Villa Park Redevelopment  (Read 1125849 times)

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35483
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10065 on: April 24, 2025, 05:10:19 PM »
I've just had a quick look. One chap reckons we wont ever be successful financially because our location does not have a skyline. And no, I'm not making that up.


The skyline that's been key to their success for 100 plus years.

Offline placeforparks

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2332
  • GM : PCM
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10066 on: April 24, 2025, 05:14:22 PM »
as others have said, it has been value-engineered from the previous proposals. i don't think the exterior of the stand looks great personally, but i think there is lots which can be done with lighting and detailing to make it more appealling.

i note the car parking has gone in the visuals, so really interested to see if that is artistic licence or whether they are going to prioritise people over potential parking income. the cynic in me thinks not.

that all said, it allows the stadium to grow by 20% and can be done relatively quickly with little operational impact. and when i think back to where the club was ten years ago, it seems difficult to care about crappy cladding!

Offline jon collett

  • Member
  • Posts: 1044
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10067 on: April 24, 2025, 05:15:08 PM »
I've just had a quick look. One chap reckons we wont ever be successful financially because our location does not have a skyline. And no, I'm not making that up.

So ignorant. I doubt there’s a finer skyline and approach to a ground in the country than Aston Hall and Aston Church.

They may know their geography but they don’t know their history of why the Clubs are so distinct!

Offline IFWaters

  • Member
  • Posts: 1988
  • Location: down south
  • GM : Sep, 2012
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10068 on: April 24, 2025, 05:33:31 PM »
On the plus side its a quick way to let more of us see our team.

On the down side its an architectural dogs breakfast that is beneath us.

On balance its entirely in tune with the times we live in.

Online john2710

  • Member
  • Posts: 3060
  • Location: Hall Green
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10069 on: April 24, 2025, 05:36:20 PM »
Who gives a shite what Small Heathens think. Their opinions are & always have been irrelevant.

But I might swap our world class manager, billionaire owners & squad full of international players for a skyline, an anthem & the name of the city.

Offline Dave P

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14632
  • Location: Redditch
  • GM : PCM
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10070 on: April 24, 2025, 05:47:30 PM »
Who was it on here that had a bet with their mate that there wouldn’t be a spade in the ground within 3 years of their announcement? We must be 12-18 months in and it’s probably as safe bet.

Offline Dick Edwards

  • Member
  • Posts: 524
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10071 on: April 24, 2025, 05:59:38 PM »
Well there's one team who we can safely say it isn't their second favourite ground.  And they have 2 (two) threads on their forum stating it still wont be as big as the proposed wheels blunderdome and it isn't in Birmingham and not having Birmingham in our name will stunt our growth and wont get us revenue and we'll get eclipsed any day now.
Our friends have also failed to recognise Arsenal do not carry the name of their city and their revenue is unaffected. Ditto Tottenham.
« Last Edit: April 24, 2025, 06:07:20 PM by Dick Edwards »

Offline Dave P

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14632
  • Location: Redditch
  • GM : PCM
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10072 on: April 24, 2025, 06:16:03 PM »
Well there's one team who we can safely say it isn't their second favourite ground.  And they have 2 (two) threads on their forum stating it still wont be as big as the proposed wheels blunderdome and it isn't in Birmingham and not having Birmingham in our name will stunt our growth and wont get us revenue and we'll get eclipsed any day now.
Our friends have also failed to recognise Arsenal do not carry the name of their city and their revenue is unaffected. Ditto Tottenham.

And the best example, Juventus. Everyone knows they are from Turin and no one thinks Torino are better off with the name.

Online algy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6074
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Gogledd Cymru
  • GM : 26.03.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10073 on: April 24, 2025, 06:17:06 PM »
I think it's disappointing compared to what they originally planned.

No brickwork?

Just looks cheap imo.
I wasn’t a fan on first sight, but I’m potentially warming to it. There’ll (hopefully) be an incredible level of continuity there - the new stand built to enclose the old (current) stand, of which the lower tier belongs to the older Witton End - but even that contains a fragment of wall from the aquarium that predates it.

They could really make a thing of it - the stand that remembers every moment of Villa Park’s history.

Offline Chip Butty 111

  • Member
  • Posts: 773
  • Age: 57
  • Location: In the Chip Shop
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10074 on: April 24, 2025, 06:20:58 PM »
I've just had a quick look. One chap reckons we wont ever be successful financially because our location does not have a skyline. And no, I'm not making that up.


The skyline that's been key to their success for 100 plus years.
Funny really, San Siro..Nou Camp...Amsterdam Arena..Signal Iduna Park..all out of town + no skyline and all shit then?

Offline CT Villan

  • Member
  • Posts: 2493
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10075 on: April 24, 2025, 06:33:09 PM »
I've just had a quick look. One chap reckons we wont ever be successful financially because our location does not have a skyline. And no, I'm not making that up.

"Well may I ask what you expect to see out of a Villa Park window? Sydney Opera House perhaps? The Hanging Gardens of Babylon? Herds of wildebeest sweeping majestically across the plain..."

The knuckledragging troglodytes...

Offline AV82EC

  • Member
  • Posts: 12252
  • Location: Macclesfield
  • GM : 22.02.2024
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10076 on: April 24, 2025, 07:08:47 PM »
Ultimately it’s a football stadium and I’m less concerned with the aesthetics than the move to 50k+. Hopefully we get some movement in the ST waiting list but like others I suspect it’ll be a big uplift in GA+ offerings with maybe 2-3k of the uplift for GA. Though if it maybe agglomerates the GA+ stuff in one place rather than the Lower Grounds mish mash of stuff around the ground that may be a better solution.

I’m reasonably hopeful that Mayor Parker can get the Witton station stuff moving as part of the national money that’s surely available for Euro28. He really needs to deliver on this as he’s got an election in 2028 just before Euro28. I think Naseef’s statement made it quite clear that the whole thing hinges on Parker and the Transport issue. 

Overall I’m positive and it seems to be an achievable plan and not some 60k+ pipe dream without a master plan and council and CA backing.

Offline Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air

  • Member
  • Posts: 11559
  • Location: Upton Park....No, Olympic Stadium....No, Aston Park...Yes that's it,Turf Moor.
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10077 on: April 24, 2025, 07:22:52 PM »
Well there's one team who we can safely say it isn't their second favourite ground.  And they have 2 (two) threads on their forum stating it still wont be as big as the proposed wheels blunderdome and it isn't in Birmingham and not having Birmingham in our name will stunt our growth and wont get us revenue and we'll get eclipsed any day now.
Our friends have also failed to recognise Arsenal do not carry the name of their city and their revenue is unaffected. Ditto Tottenham.

And the best example, Juventus. Everyone knows they are from Turin and no one thinks Torino are better off with the name.

Torino are bigger. Juve never had Gerry Hitchens.

Offline The Edge

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7446
  • Location: I can see villa park from my bedroom window
  • GM : PCM
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10078 on: April 24, 2025, 07:30:02 PM »
Ultimately it’s a football stadium and I’m less concerned with the aesthetics than the move to 50k+. Hopefully we get some movement in the ST waiting list but like others I suspect it’ll be a big uplift in GA+ offerings with maybe 2-3k of the uplift for GA. Though if it maybe agglomerates the GA+ stuff in one place rather than the Lower Grounds mish mash of stuff around the ground that may be a better solution.

I’m reasonably hopeful that Mayor Parker can get the Witton station stuff moving as part of the national money that’s surely available for Euro28. He really needs to deliver on this as he’s got an election in 2028 just before Euro28. I think Naseef’s statement made it quite clear that the whole thing hinges on Parker and the Transport issue. 

Overall I’m positive and it seems to be an achievable plan and not some 60k+ pipe dream without a master plan and council and CA backing.
I agree with this. Only the Holte End has any architectural merit these days from the outside. I think it will look great on the inside when the ground is packed. We will finally have some some symmetry.

Offline Villan82

  • Member
  • Posts: 4224
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10079 on: April 24, 2025, 07:35:55 PM »
Ultimately it’s a football stadium and I’m less concerned with the aesthetics than the move to 50k+. Hopefully we get some movement in the ST waiting list but like others I suspect it’ll be a big uplift in GA+ offerings with maybe 2-3k of the uplift for GA. Though if it maybe agglomerates the GA+ stuff in one place rather than the Lower Grounds mish mash of stuff around the ground that may be a better solution.

I’m reasonably hopeful that Mayor Parker can get the Witton station stuff moving as part of the national money that’s surely available for Euro28. He really needs to deliver on this as he’s got an election in 2028 just before Euro28. I think Naseef’s statement made it quite clear that the whole thing hinges on Parker and the Transport issue. 

Overall I’m positive and it seems to be an achievable plan and not some 60k+ pipe dream without a master plan and council and CA backing.
I agree with this. Only the Holte End has any architectural merit these days from the outside. I think it will look great on the inside when the ground is packed. We will finally have some some symmetry.

Hats off to you by the way. I think you were early with the news that this was being worked on.

This is excellent news. Credit where it's due to everyone at the club. I think this will look ace when it is completed and the modern Villa Park will, finally, have a 'complete' feel to it.

Edit. Just watched the video posted on the official site. The stand looks really impressive at the start, looking towards the Trinity/North corner.
« Last Edit: April 24, 2025, 07:51:02 PM by Villan82 »

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal