collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Emi Martinez by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:01:33 PM]


Europa League 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 08:57:01 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by JUAN PABLO
[Today at 08:55:30 PM]


Leander Dendoncker by Toronto Villa
[Today at 08:53:45 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Meanwood Villa
[Today at 08:51:34 PM]


Standard of Refereeing by Mister E
[Today at 08:29:47 PM]


Evann Guessand by kippaxvilla2
[Today at 08:28:38 PM]


John McGinn by PeterWithesShin
[Today at 08:25:47 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Emi Martinez by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:01:33 PM]


Re: Europa League 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 08:57:01 PM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by JUAN PABLO
[Today at 08:55:30 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker by Toronto Villa
[Today at 08:53:45 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Meanwood Villa
[Today at 08:51:34 PM]


Re: Emi Martinez by Toronto Villa
[Today at 08:49:09 PM]


Re: Emi Martinez by Somniloquism
[Today at 08:38:45 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[Today at 08:34:47 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Villa Park Redevelopment  (Read 1140693 times)

Offline Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36423
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6285 on: January 18, 2024, 12:52:14 PM »
How on earth do Man Chea£y have a higher turnover than Man Utd  ;) another firm of great accountants
Sponsorship.
Nothing to do with Accountants, it’s to do with them being owned by an oil state and connected parties paying massively over the odds.
Which is supposed to not happen under FFP. Artificially inflating sponsorship deals is against the rules

Hence the 115 charges.

Now that we’re back where we started do you want to start the whole merry-go-round again?

Offline Stu82

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 865
  • Location: In the sticks
  • GM : 30.09.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6286 on: January 18, 2024, 01:18:36 PM »
Newcastle marchday income is £38m. A ground with 10,000 more seats. West Ham is £41m, a ground with 20,000 more seats. I refer to the honoruable member for Satriales in his scathing rebuke of the accounts deniers and the fanciful notion that £70 per head is about right.

Like Cato before me, I call for the destruction of Villa Park and a new ground please.

I do find these figures mystifying, perhaps it is as Risso suggested, that the corporate and hospitality for Villa is not in match day figures.
Because figures above give Newcastle a per head price of £ 38, W ham (despite loads of empty seats) £36 per head, and Villa £23.

Think we can all agree £23 is a bit low.





Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75730
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6287 on: January 18, 2024, 01:22:05 PM »
It will depend what year the numbers are for, as Ads pointed out our £19m will have including part of the covid restrictions.

Offline Stu82

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 865
  • Location: In the sticks
  • GM : 30.09.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6288 on: January 18, 2024, 01:23:36 PM »
It will depend what year the numbers are for, as Ads pointed out our £19m will have including part of the covid restrictions.

That’ll be it then

Offline Dave P

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14634
  • Location: Redditch
  • GM : PCM
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6289 on: January 18, 2024, 01:25:58 PM »
I'm sure I read that Spurs' new stadium has an on site brewery. So it'll cost to make the beer but they won't have to pay to transport it. This presumably equals more profit when they sell it on matchday.
But of their beers on sale are the usual mass produced crap.

It's a Beavertown brewery on site in the stadium.

Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47495
  • GM : 25.07.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6290 on: January 18, 2024, 02:01:55 PM »
It's a Beavertown brewery on site in the stadium.

A friend of mine once said that a successful social network needs to make women feel safe on it. Because then men will want to be there, too, where the women are.  It's a bit like boozers,

It all makes sense now.

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 42838
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6291 on: January 18, 2024, 04:44:21 PM »
153 left for Newcastle at those craaaaaaazeeeee prices.

Online Olneythelonely

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8743
  • Location: Selly Park
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6292 on: January 18, 2024, 05:22:29 PM »
How on earth do Man Chea£y have a higher turnover than Man Utd  ;) another firm of great accountants

Are you some kind of performance artist?

There's a reason he was banned twice before.

I’m just finding out this is Cooper’s Injury. He must be an adult now.

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33707
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6293 on: January 18, 2024, 05:36:53 PM »
Come on, we need agitators in Flinstone and Footy's absences. It's too Happy Heroes otherwise.

Offline wince

  • Member
  • Posts: 4683
  • Location: Deepest Darkest Yardley
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6294 on: January 18, 2024, 06:18:09 PM »
Reading through this am surprised many of you want to move from VP. Would be mortified if villa moved from fortress trinity road

Offline brontebilly

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11065
  • GM : 23.06.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6295 on: January 18, 2024, 07:58:02 PM »
I haven't been to Spurs new stadium but the old WHL was some kip. Levy look a lot of flak for not backing mercenaries like Mourinho and Conte but it seems to have worked out very well for them. We will be doing very well to finish ahead of them on the field this season, off it we are simply miles off them.

Offline VillaTim

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12590
  • Location: The Co-op, Inveraray.
  • GM : 04.12.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6296 on: January 18, 2024, 08:09:52 PM »
I've been to the new Spurs ground , as new bowls go it's actually quite decent , the stands feel close to the pitch etc. Obviously the surrounding areas aren't the best and the tube is miles away so it has accessibility issues.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37166
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6297 on: January 20, 2024, 01:01:04 PM »
Reading through this am surprised many of you want to move from VP. Would be mortified if villa moved from fortress trinity road

Top of the list, miles above any other concern, is that I want to see us win trophies. If moving to a new ground with better facilities, more space and better setup to earn money on non-match days gives us the funds we need to compete then I don't see any chance it won't happen whilst we have owners with the same aim.

Offline VillaTim

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12590
  • Location: The Co-op, Inveraray.
  • GM : 04.12.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6298 on: January 20, 2024, 01:10:39 PM »
kicking a ball in a new Villa Park would be 10 years away even if they hit the button today , so i'm not going to lose any sleep on it

Offline luke95

  • Member
  • Posts: 1270
  • Location: Here, there, everyfuckingwhere!!
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #6299 on: January 20, 2024, 01:16:26 PM »
Reading through this am surprised many of you want to move from VP. Would be mortified if villa moved from fortress trinity road
It would be the end for me . Villa Park is Aston Villa !
Anywhere else just will not look , feel, smell the same & just will not pull at the heart strings the way VP does . Its so much more than just a fortnightly visit to a game.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2024, 04:32:15 PM by luke95 »

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal