collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Evann Guessand by Garyth
[Today at 02:24:10 AM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by usav
[Today at 01:47:22 AM]


23 April 1975 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:17:02 AM]


Pre season 2025 by ChicagoLion
[Today at 12:54:36 AM]


FFP by Somniloquism
[August 05, 2025, 10:38:10 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[August 05, 2025, 10:32:01 PM]


Ollie Watkins by ozzjim
[August 05, 2025, 10:30:14 PM]


Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by Steve67
[August 05, 2025, 10:10:07 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Villa Park Redevelopment  (Read 1138050 times)

Offline Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47402
  • GM : 25.07.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5625 on: January 06, 2024, 12:42:41 PM »
I'd also stay at Villa Park. We're all in this because of emotion. None of it makes sense. If you want to be hard headed and logical about it you might as well buy some shares and support the mighty Tesco against Sainsbury's.

P!ss off, I'm not supporting those Baggies wannabes, it's Sainsbury's every time.

Offline Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 22824
  • Location: Salop
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5626 on: January 06, 2024, 12:46:37 PM »
Sainsbury's is clearly the superior operation. If only they could do something about those colours.

Offline VILLA MOLE

  • Member
  • Posts: 7907
  • Age: 50
  • Location: STRATFORD UPON AVON
  • a v f c
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5627 on: January 06, 2024, 12:52:18 PM »
Surely as we are all from the Shires we follow Waitrose ,  everywhere we go , everywhere we go 👀

Offline VillaTim

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12565
  • Location: The Co-op, Inveraray.
  • GM : 04.12.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5628 on: January 06, 2024, 12:54:23 PM »
Is it beyond the realms to move into an expanded Alexander stadium for two years while we rebuild VP? The capacity was 30k for the games so at the very least we’d accommodate season ticket holders. Is that a non starter?
If you scroll back about 50 pages that option was kicked about a bit

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63313
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5629 on: January 06, 2024, 12:54:35 PM »
Is it beyond the realms to move into an expanded Alexander stadium for two years while we rebuild VP? The capacity was 30k for the games so at the very least we’d accommodate season ticket holders. Is that a non starter?

It's totally unsuited for football, too much of the seating is uncovered, transport is much worse and the locals would kick up a fuss.

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26205
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5630 on: January 06, 2024, 12:56:18 PM »
Has any one come up with a suitable location for a new ground?

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74474
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5631 on: January 06, 2024, 01:00:47 PM »
Is it beyond the realms to move into an expanded Alexander stadium for two years while we rebuild VP? The capacity was 30k for the games so at the very least we’d accommodate season ticket holders. Is that a non starter?

It's totally unsuited for football, too much of the seating is uncovered, transport is much worse and the locals would kick up a fuss.

The Hawthorns would be the only realistic choice.

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26205
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5632 on: January 06, 2024, 01:04:03 PM »
Is it beyond the realms to move into an expanded Alexander stadium for two years while we rebuild VP? The capacity was 30k for the games so at the very least we’d accommodate season ticket holders. Is that a non starter?

It's totally unsuited for football, too much of the seating is uncovered, transport is much worse and the locals would kick up a fuss.

The Hawthorns would be the only realistic choice.
Only 26,668 capacity according to Wiki.
Old Trafford , Emptyhad? if it was for one season.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63313
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5633 on: January 06, 2024, 01:04:43 PM »
Is it beyond the realms to move into an expanded Alexander stadium for two years while we rebuild VP? The capacity was 30k for the games so at the very least we’d accommodate season ticket holders. Is that a non starter?

It's totally unsuited for football, too much of the seating is uncovered, transport is much worse and the locals would kick up a fuss.

The Hawthorns would be the only realistic choice.

I agree. It would be nice to work together with our old friendly rivals in a spirit of sportsmanship and community 

Offline VillaTim

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12565
  • Location: The Co-op, Inveraray.
  • GM : 04.12.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5634 on: January 06, 2024, 01:04:58 PM »
Has any one come up with a suitable location for a new ground?
Town centre seems the least contentious. NEC no. Perry Barr no.

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26205
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5635 on: January 06, 2024, 01:06:16 PM »
Has any one come up with a suitable location for a new ground?
Town centre seems the least contentious. NEC no. Perry Barr no.
Is there a specific available space in the City Centre?

Offline VillaTim

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12565
  • Location: The Co-op, Inveraray.
  • GM : 04.12.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5636 on: January 06, 2024, 01:07:51 PM »
Has any one come up with a suitable location for a new ground?
Town centre seems the least contentious. NEC no. Perry Barr no.
Is there a specific available space in the City Centre?
There's plenty. Whether they are affordable or the council would want it are other matters . Might be somewhat easier now with city centre high street retail etc dying on its feet it may be a way of injecting some life back into town . I'd rather stay in B6 but if it was a move town centre is the most logical .
« Last Edit: January 06, 2024, 01:09:51 PM by VillaTim »

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5637 on: January 06, 2024, 01:09:27 PM »
Is it beyond the realms to move into an expanded Alexander stadium for two years while we rebuild VP? The capacity was 30k for the games so at the very least we’d accommodate season ticket holders. Is that a non starter?

It's totally unsuited for football, too much of the seating is uncovered, transport is much worse and the locals would kick up a fuss.

The Hawthorns would be the only realistic choice.
Only 26,668 capacity according to Wiki.
Old Trafford , Emptyhad? if it was for one season.

If we ever did decide to rebuild/move, Leicester will probably be 40,000 by then, which would make far more sense. Trains direct from New Street to Leicester, or quick dash up the M69.

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26205
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5638 on: January 06, 2024, 01:11:21 PM »
Has any one come up with a suitable location for a new ground?
Town centre seems the least contentious. NEC no. Perry Barr no.
Is there a specific available space in the City Centre?
There's plenty. Whether they are affordable or the council would want it are other matters
I doubt anywhere has the space for parking or infrastructure for getting traffic in and out though.
Also there is no benefit as we are not allowed to drink in town.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #5639 on: January 06, 2024, 01:12:16 PM »
Has any one come up with a suitable location for a new ground?
Town centre seems the least contentious. NEC no. Perry Barr no.
Is there a specific available space in the City Centre?
There's plenty. Whether they are affordable or the council would want it are other matters

I was reading about Comcast the other day, and for developments they've liked to have a stadium tied in to lots of other uses like retail, hotels, other leisure and restaurants etc. I guess it makes more sense if you want a return on your investment to have a site that's bringing in rental income all year round, rather than just on match days. On that basis, I reckon they'd look at an out of town location.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal