I am struggling to see the logic in what Heck clumsily announced. It makes absolutely no sense and is going to hold us back.The only logic I can see is that he's a politician and he likes to be seen doing things differently to his predecessor. He has probably spent 6 months trying to convince the owners to scrap this and he broke them down. Villa Park was always among the elite grounds because the founders of the club had vision and ambition. It has now fallen behind these nine clubsMan UMan CityTottenhamLiverpool ArsenalEvertonNewcastleWest HamSunderland
I'm as pissed off as the next man that ground redevelopments have been shelved. I couldn't wait for a new North stand then a new Doug Ellis stand. We would have had a truly unique 60k wonder stadium.But to say we are now gonna be left behind and can't reach the next level staying as is for the next several years is untrue.Chelsea have the exact same size stadium. Has it stopped them becoming a world force with several Premier leagues and Champions Leagues to there name? No.
A strange statement about too much too soon, that doesn't really ring true. Not said with any conviction either.£10,000 is the cost per additional seat now, up from £4,000 pre-pandemic. Its not going to get any cheaper.We have significantly wealthy owners and now we're in bed with significantly wealthy (infrastructure providers) funders.Commercial revenue has grown, with more and more corporate being crammed in every possible space, but we've reached capacity and we are instead looking at adding the warehouse, rather than new areas. Largely because there's nowhere to add new offerings too. Which contradicts the aim to grow, making the first paragraph all the more puzzling.We have transport issues, but they're not contingent on planning and frankly, if it's built, people will come and go, just more slowly than they'd like.He describes plans as being thoughtful. What a strangely deliberate phrase.It's all very confusing and doesn't ring true. We haven't had the whole truth or anything close to it.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on December 19, 2023, 11:15:40 PMQuote from: andyh on December 19, 2023, 11:12:47 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on December 19, 2023, 11:08:34 PMQuote from: andyh on December 19, 2023, 11:07:17 PMThe badge ‘fiasco’ has been explained, time and time again.Explained really badly with a scarcely believable story about it being an experiment, it being some shit about a 1982 commemoration on, err, the 41st anniversary.We now have a situation where we have two totally different badges used by media outlets and are about to get a third.No, that’s not it all.It was explained in a claret a blue podcast, in depth, how the selection process was worded and constructed in way that Purslow pre defined deisign was always going to be ‘the winner’.It was never about giving the fans a say, it was about appearing to give the fans a say.And how does that reflect in any way well on Heck? Come out and tell us that's the reasoning if that is the case. And I don't really understand how something on the claret and blue podcast explains anything from the club's viewpoint on the badge.They should have just said, we got it wrong and come clean on it.Something that haven't actually even done - Heck referred today to consulting with the fan base on the new badge. How have they done that? I must have missed it. They also present it as something they've done out of the goodness of their hearts rather than a Premier League requirement to consult, which is what it is.I have responded to a new badge questionnaire. I think lots on here have done.I think the point I am making about the current badge is that it was sold as a modern, fit for purpose upgrade on the Lerner rubbish, whereas Heck realised it was a Purslow vanity project and so pulled the plug and is now doing what Purslow was supposed to be doing but wasn’t, consulting the fans for a true, fans led, replacement.I guess we will find out in a few weeks how dangerous it is to let people vote for something.
Quote from: andyh on December 19, 2023, 11:12:47 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on December 19, 2023, 11:08:34 PMQuote from: andyh on December 19, 2023, 11:07:17 PMThe badge ‘fiasco’ has been explained, time and time again.Explained really badly with a scarcely believable story about it being an experiment, it being some shit about a 1982 commemoration on, err, the 41st anniversary.We now have a situation where we have two totally different badges used by media outlets and are about to get a third.No, that’s not it all.It was explained in a claret a blue podcast, in depth, how the selection process was worded and constructed in way that Purslow pre defined deisign was always going to be ‘the winner’.It was never about giving the fans a say, it was about appearing to give the fans a say.And how does that reflect in any way well on Heck? Come out and tell us that's the reasoning if that is the case. And I don't really understand how something on the claret and blue podcast explains anything from the club's viewpoint on the badge.They should have just said, we got it wrong and come clean on it.Something that haven't actually even done - Heck referred today to consulting with the fan base on the new badge. How have they done that? I must have missed it. They also present it as something they've done out of the goodness of their hearts rather than a Premier League requirement to consult, which is what it is.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on December 19, 2023, 11:08:34 PMQuote from: andyh on December 19, 2023, 11:07:17 PMThe badge ‘fiasco’ has been explained, time and time again.Explained really badly with a scarcely believable story about it being an experiment, it being some shit about a 1982 commemoration on, err, the 41st anniversary.We now have a situation where we have two totally different badges used by media outlets and are about to get a third.No, that’s not it all.It was explained in a claret a blue podcast, in depth, how the selection process was worded and constructed in way that Purslow pre defined deisign was always going to be ‘the winner’.It was never about giving the fans a say, it was about appearing to give the fans a say.
Quote from: andyh on December 19, 2023, 11:07:17 PMThe badge ‘fiasco’ has been explained, time and time again.Explained really badly with a scarcely believable story about it being an experiment, it being some shit about a 1982 commemoration on, err, the 41st anniversary.We now have a situation where we have two totally different badges used by media outlets and are about to get a third.
The badge ‘fiasco’ has been explained, time and time again.
My guess is that releasing the news now is so that most people forget about it over Christmas.It seems like a radical change without a further plan at this point. I very much doubt that's the case, but perhaps they just aren't at a point to share what the new plan is?If it's a move, that's fucking huge.If it's rail seating, it's radical.Maybe ticket sales are about right, there's demand enough to sell out but not enough to sell an additional 10k.Maybe they'll fill in the corners.Perhaps it's brinkmanship to get Witton Station done.Perhaps they realise that better facilities in what we've got will be more of a revenue generator.Do the outside first, get revenue per head up before developing.Of course the ground would look super shit to everyone else if we get Champions League and then have to play in reduced capacity and who knows the effect it could have.We're 150 next year, and if we do that well it will improve our standing. I suspect there are good plans for it.What I don't get right now is the reason people are so pissed off.
Villa Park has soul, history and is a huge part of our identity. As a kid I'm not sure if it was Aston Villa or Villa Park that I fell in love with. Villa Park, probably more than is the case for any other club, is hugely wrapped up in our very identity.We have acres of space behind both goals - this is why we have always, historically, had massive end terraces/stands. There is no excuse for moving. There are two railway stations and a motorway and you are not a million miles from the city centre. Some might think a move solves some of our issues but is it worth trading what we have at Villa Park for a greenfield site in the middle of nowhere that needs a car to get to or another city location far from our roots and with its own problems.I challenge anybody to watch this video and still argue we can't get to the next level at our existing location:
Quote from: Drummond on December 19, 2023, 11:52:40 PMMy guess is that releasing the news now is so that most people forget about it over Christmas.It seems like a radical change without a further plan at this point. I very much doubt that's the case, but perhaps they just aren't at a point to share what the new plan is?If it's a move, that's fucking huge.If it's rail seating, it's radical.Maybe ticket sales are about right, there's demand enough to sell out but not enough to sell an additional 10k.Maybe they'll fill in the corners.Perhaps it's brinkmanship to get Witton Station done.Perhaps they realise that better facilities in what we've got will be more of a revenue generator.Do the outside first, get revenue per head up before developing.Of course the ground would look super shit to everyone else if we get Champions League and then have to play in reduced capacity and who knows the effect it could have.We're 150 next year, and if we do that well it will improve our standing. I suspect there are good plans for it.What I don't get right now is the reason people are so pissed off.I'm guessing you're not one of those on the waiting list. I've waited for years for me and my two sons to be able to get season tickets together. My youngest enlisted us and we're about 9000th on the list.This has come as a kick in the teeth for us and the worst part is the cold way it was announced just "it's not happening" without any suggestion of what actually WILL be happening.
Villa Park has soul, history and is a huge part of our identity. As a kid I'm not sure if it was Aston Villa or Villa Park that I fell in love with. Villa Park, probably more than is the case for any other club, is hugely wrapped up in our very identity.
Quote from: The Edge on December 20, 2023, 09:41:57 AMQuote from: Drummond on December 19, 2023, 11:52:40 PMMy guess is that releasing the news now is so that most people forget about it over Christmas.It seems like a radical change without a further plan at this point. I very much doubt that's the case, but perhaps they just aren't at a point to share what the new plan is?If it's a move, that's fucking huge.If it's rail seating, it's radical.Maybe ticket sales are about right, there's demand enough to sell out but not enough to sell an additional 10k.Maybe they'll fill in the corners.Perhaps it's brinkmanship to get Witton Station done.Perhaps they realise that better facilities in what we've got will be more of a revenue generator.Do the outside first, get revenue per head up before developing.Of course the ground would look super shit to everyone else if we get Champions League and then have to play in reduced capacity and who knows the effect it could have.We're 150 next year, and if we do that well it will improve our standing. I suspect there are good plans for it.What I don't get right now is the reason people are so pissed off.I'm guessing you're not one of those on the waiting list. I've waited for years for me and my two sons to be able to get season tickets together. My youngest enlisted us and we're about 9000th on the list.This has come as a kick in the teeth for us and the worst part is the cold way it was announced just "it's not happening" without any suggestion of what actually WILL be happening. So yes I'm pissed off about it and I believe I have every right to be alongside the thousands of other genuine hopefuls who joined the waiting list. Same here, as a member, I could have taken reduced chances of getting a ticket for me and my lad for 2 years if there was a bigger chance after that of getting a ST.I just hope Heck sorts his comms out and tells up what the plan for the ground is sooner rather than later.
Quote from: Drummond on December 19, 2023, 11:52:40 PMMy guess is that releasing the news now is so that most people forget about it over Christmas.It seems like a radical change without a further plan at this point. I very much doubt that's the case, but perhaps they just aren't at a point to share what the new plan is?If it's a move, that's fucking huge.If it's rail seating, it's radical.Maybe ticket sales are about right, there's demand enough to sell out but not enough to sell an additional 10k.Maybe they'll fill in the corners.Perhaps it's brinkmanship to get Witton Station done.Perhaps they realise that better facilities in what we've got will be more of a revenue generator.Do the outside first, get revenue per head up before developing.Of course the ground would look super shit to everyone else if we get Champions League and then have to play in reduced capacity and who knows the effect it could have.We're 150 next year, and if we do that well it will improve our standing. I suspect there are good plans for it.What I don't get right now is the reason people are so pissed off.I'm guessing you're not one of those on the waiting list. I've waited for years for me and my two sons to be able to get season tickets together. My youngest enlisted us and we're about 9000th on the list.This has come as a kick in the teeth for us and the worst part is the cold way it was announced just "it's not happening" without any suggestion of what actually WILL be happening. So yes I'm pissed off about it and I believe I have every right to be alongside the thousands of other genuine hopefuls who joined the waiting list.