collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by VillaTim
[Today at 09:09:19 PM]


Pre season 2025 by VillaTim
[Today at 09:07:59 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 09:05:37 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by PaulWinch again
[Today at 08:23:16 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by PeterWithesShin
[Today at 07:50:47 PM]


FFP by Mister E
[Today at 07:36:50 PM]


Golf 2025 by Villa Lew
[Today at 06:43:51 PM]


Kits 25/26 by Allan C
[Today at 06:09:38 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Villa Park Redevelopment  (Read 1132479 times)

Online itbrvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 7402
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : 16.02.2022
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4260 on: December 19, 2023, 01:11:58 PM »
Strange news. 
Either they haven’t got enough cash.
Or a ground move. 
Wasn't an investment partner announced in the last week or so? All very odd.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74463
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4261 on: December 19, 2023, 01:12:25 PM »
Plus, our stadium has very little history left already now. It's 70s - 00s, aside from the location.

It's surprising how many away fans don't realise this.

I was listening to a football podcast recently and they discussed Villa Park, and the one guy said he was going there in a few weeks and he was really excited as it's such a historic ground etc etc, and then specifically said he was looking forward to seeing Archibald Leitch's work.

Good luck with that.

I also think a lot of away fans think the rear of the Holte End is 100 years old and a remnant of a historic part of the ground which has survived the years.

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 41403
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4262 on: December 19, 2023, 01:12:38 PM »
I think the idea is to wait until we're shit again before knocking down the North Stand.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30209
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4263 on: December 19, 2023, 01:12:50 PM »
Would it be surprising that this is put on hold so we don’t have a reduced capacity headed into what might be CL football? It would be shit to finally get there and only have three stands in place. So this decisions avoids that but also buys a little more time to get everything right around the ground as well the stand itself.

I think that's what it is but who knows?

Offline Simon Page

  • Member
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4264 on: December 19, 2023, 01:13:07 PM »
His interview reminded me of a speech I was once witness to before a round of redundancies were announced. I took redundancy.

We're thrilled to announce an exciting vision of future possibilities with opportunity at the core and a focus on customer experience while valuing our most precious assets: YOU!

Security?

Offline DB

  • Member
  • Posts: 5538
  • Location: Absolute zero
  • GM : 11.01.2021
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4265 on: December 19, 2023, 01:13:39 PM »
Wow, there is a lot of jumping to conclusions and the usual over-reactions. 

I can't see too much to get upset about in what he said there, using the current form as a reason might be a little in the now, but nothing too egregious there.

One thing I've noticed about Heck so far is that there's been quite a lot of "stopping doing stuff" and not very much of "We're doing this instead".

I take his point about demolishing the north stand whilst having a massive favourable turnaround in what is on the pitch, that makes sense, but it would have been much, much better if he'd described what we were going to do instead.

You've told us what we are not doing, now tell us what we ARE doing.

Yes, I said this a couple of pages back. The comms has been awful.

Offline nick harper

  • Member
  • Posts: 2046
  • GM : Feb, 2012
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4266 on: December 19, 2023, 01:13:53 PM »
Wow, there is a lot of jumping to conclusions and the usual over-reactions. 

I can't see too much to get upset about in what he said there, using the current form as a reason might be a little in the now, but nothing too egregious there.

One thing I've noticed about Heck so far is that there's been quite a lot of "stopping doing stuff" and not very much of "We're doing this instead".

I take his point about demolishing the north stand whilst having a massive favourable turnaround in what is on the pitch, that makes sense, but it would have been much, much better if he'd described what we were going to do instead.

You've told us what we are not doing, now tell us what we ARE doing.

Yes, agree with this. It just feels deflating. Priority is to double the size of the store, add another corporate venue (great), and improve facilities at Bodymoor, which is fine but makes no difference to the fans. Meanwhile, the configuration of the North Stand means continued cramped legroom, concourse space and a stand no longer fit for the 21st century. Ditto Witton Lane.

I don’t have any doubt we’d fill 50,000. Wes Ham have doubled their attendance average. Everton will add another 15,000. He needs to come up with a bigger vision, and share it quickly.

Online Richard E

  • Member
  • Posts: 14131
  • Age: 54
  • Location: Tipton
  • This also will pass.
  • GM : 28.02.2019
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4267 on: December 19, 2023, 01:14:25 PM »
I think the idea is to wait until we're shit again before knocking down the North Stand.

You mean we’re stuck with the North Stand forever?!?

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4268 on: December 19, 2023, 01:14:27 PM »
Would it be surprising that this is put on hold so we don’t have a reduced capacity headed into what might be CL football? It would be shit to finally get there and only have three stands in place. So this decisions avoids that but also buys a little more time to get everything right around the ground as well the stand itself.

That's such a piss poor excuse though. We don't just want Champions League for one year, we want it every year. There's never going to be a good time to knock down a stand, but as I said earlier, all investments require short term pain. We haven't achieved Champions League football yet, anyway, and if we do, then we could go out of the group stage at the first hurdle. Is it really worth holding back on a major redevelopment for the sake of a possible three extra games?

Online VILLA MOLE

  • Member
  • Posts: 7892
  • Age: 50
  • Location: STRATFORD UPON AVON
  • a v f c
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4269 on: December 19, 2023, 01:15:11 PM »
It does not feel a great day for off the field news ,  but hey hoe off we go or not as it stands 

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74463
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4270 on: December 19, 2023, 01:15:54 PM »
I think this is about keeping their options open and seeing what happens the next season or two. If we end up winning the league / qualifying for and doing well in the Champions League then maybe that changes the question in terms of what we want to do next.

Once the first swing of the wrecking ball makes contact with the North Stand, it'll be too late, we'll realistically be committing to the current location for the long term.

I am also wondering if they see the cash-strapped council needing to sell assets and are looking at the amount of space they might buy in Aston Park and thinking about rebuilding there, or at least buying the space to have options.


Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26187
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4271 on: December 19, 2023, 01:16:07 PM »
Yes, relocation must be on the cards.
So not telling us anything does not really fit with the fans are at the centre of everything.
I have spent a lot of time doing business with Americans and they all sound like that when they are avoiding telling you the truth.
 

Offline curiousorange

  • Member
  • Posts: 9322
  • Location: In the sauce
    • Chris Stanley's Bazaar
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4272 on: December 19, 2023, 01:17:06 PM »
Fans follow success, but they also follow the illusion of success. A lot of us consider football to be life or death, but a great many others see it mainly as an experience. If we're serious PL players in the years to come, we'd sell 50k every home game, no sweat.

Offline Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 22813
  • Location: Salop
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4273 on: December 19, 2023, 01:19:17 PM »
To my addled mind, the only comparable ground to VP was Highbury. The Arsenal fans seem happy enough with their airport lounge. We're not Arsenal fans though, and I'd fucking hate to have anything similar.

Then again, I don't go very often so I'd defer to those who do.

Offline usav

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16135
  • Location: Pittsburgh, PA.
  • GM : 27.05.26
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4274 on: December 19, 2023, 01:20:02 PM »
I think this is about keeping their options open and seeing what happens the next season or two. If we end up winning the league / qualifying for and doing well in the Champions League then maybe that changes the question in terms of what we want to do next.

Once the first swing of the wrecking ball makes contact with the North Stand, it'll be too late, we'll realistically be committing to the current location for the long term.

Some common sense.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal