collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Villa Park Redevelopment  (Read 1130852 times)

Offline Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47282
  • GM : 25.07.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4065 on: November 22, 2023, 02:06:44 PM »
Let’s be honest here, the last time we did this the stands were thrown up as Doug wanted as minimum as time as possible with reduced capacities without thought for the functionality of each stand, decisions we’re living with today with poor facilities in a number of those stands.

The fact we have owners who would rather do it properly and with due regard to how the stand works and functions strikes me as a much more sensible way to go about things. If that means we’re on reduced capacity for longer than we want, so be it.

Same here.

Offline Villan82

  • Member
  • Posts: 4224
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4066 on: November 22, 2023, 03:31:53 PM »
Let’s be honest here, the last time we did this the stands were thrown up as Doug wanted as minimum as time as possible with reduced capacities without thought for the functionality of each stand, decisions we’re living with today with poor facilities in a number of those stands.

The fact we have owners who would rather do it properly and with due regard to how the stand works and functions strikes me as a much more sensible way to go about things. If that means we’re on reduced capacity for longer than we want, so be it.

Same here.

All true, and very well said.

I was coming at it from the angle of, should this be the year we make the top four, it would be a  shame to have reduced capacity for the CL games.

Online AV82EC

  • Member
  • Posts: 12275
  • Location: Macclesfield
  • GM : 22.02.2024
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4067 on: November 22, 2023, 03:47:00 PM »
Let’s be honest here, the last time we did this the stands were thrown up as Doug wanted as minimum as time as possible with reduced capacities without thought for the functionality of each stand, decisions we’re living with today with poor facilities in a number of those stands.

The fact we have owners who would rather do it properly and with due regard to how the stand works and functions strikes me as a much more sensible way to go about things. If that means we’re on reduced capacity for longer than we want, so be it.

Same here.

All true, and very well said.

I was coming at it from the angle of, should this be the year we make the top four, it would be a  shame to have reduced capacity for the CL games.

It would be but as ever it’s balancing the short term pain with the longer term benefit of sorting the stadium out. However that’s easy for me to say as a STH who’d be guaranteed my seat as long as I could afford it.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15408
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4068 on: November 22, 2023, 09:35:06 PM »
Let’s be honest here, the last time we did this the stands were thrown up as Doug wanted as minimum as time as possible with reduced capacities without thought for the functionality of each stand, decisions we’re living with today with poor facilities in a number of those stands.

The fact we have owners who would rather do it properly and with due regard to how the stand works and functions strikes me as a much more sensible way to go about things. If that means we’re on reduced capacity for longer than we want, so be it.

It's just that if we do.finish in the top.5 this season, it couldn't have come at a worse time to have a much reduced capacity really...

Online AV82EC

  • Member
  • Posts: 12275
  • Location: Macclesfield
  • GM : 22.02.2024
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4069 on: November 22, 2023, 09:41:16 PM »
Let’s be honest here, the last time we did this the stands were thrown up as Doug wanted as minimum as time as possible with reduced capacities without thought for the functionality of each stand, decisions we’re living with today with poor facilities in a number of those stands.

The fact we have owners who would rather do it properly and with due regard to how the stand works and functions strikes me as a much more sensible way to go about things. If that means we’re on reduced capacity for longer than we want, so be it.

It's just that if we do.finish in the top.5 this season, it couldn't have come at a worse time to have a much reduced capacity really...

I agree but shit happens.

Offline purpletrousers

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2127
  • Location: Luton / East London
  • GM : 25.04.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4070 on: November 22, 2023, 11:34:48 PM »
It’s the sort of problem we’ve been yearning for!

Offline coreyfeldman

  • Member
  • Posts: 1665
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4071 on: November 22, 2023, 11:52:58 PM »
"My diamond shoes are too tight"

Offline claret+blue ed

  • Member
  • Posts: 301
  • Age: 48
  • Location: Barton on Humber
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4072 on: November 23, 2023, 07:17:15 AM »
I don't think it will make too much difference if we qualify for the CL, tickets will be hard to come by for non ST's anyway, hopefully the club are able to reduce the away allocation slightly during this time to alleviate the issue a bit

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33689
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4073 on: November 23, 2023, 09:54:41 AM »
I wonder what the reduced capacity will be for those two seasons....just over 30k?

Online VILLA MOLE

  • Member
  • Posts: 7883
  • Age: 50
  • Location: STRATFORD UPON AVON
  • a v f c
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4074 on: November 23, 2023, 10:09:28 AM »
I wonder what the reduced capacity will be for those two seasons....just over 30k?


35K including away fans ?

Online KevinGage

  • Member
  • Posts: 14104
  • Location: Singing from under the floorboards
  • GM : 20.09.20
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4075 on: November 23, 2023, 10:11:09 AM »
The North Stand is 6k capacity, isn't it?

So more like 36000.  Not ideal, but not the end of the world either. That's about the same as we had for Inter Milan at home in 1990, and atmosphere wasn't an issue in that game.

The new mob won't be skimping to the same extent Ellis did, but there might be 38 - 40,000 ready in that lower tier in the first year of construction. Not sure what the capacity of the lower tier on the new build is set to be, but it's bigger than the upper and wraps around to the Trinity and Witton Lane.

Offline Chico Hamilton III

  • Member
  • Posts: 19657
  • Location: South London
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4076 on: November 23, 2023, 10:13:24 AM »
Just checking the Simon Inglis books and the “money no object” Trinity Road took just over a year to build, between April 1922-August 1923 and all the groundwork was done by hand (and hosses’ hooves). Also, interesting to nerd like me, it wasn’t actually called the Trinity Road stand.

Online London Villan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10809
  • Location: Brum
  • GM : 01.10.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4077 on: November 23, 2023, 10:25:11 AM »
It almost bankrupted the club and cost Rinder his job too!

Offline Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13922
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4078 on: November 23, 2023, 10:29:25 AM »
Just checking the Simon Inglis books and the “money no object” Trinity Road took just over a year to build, between April 1922-August 1923 and all the groundwork was done by hand (and hosses’ hooves). Also, interesting to nerd like me, it wasn’t actually called the Trinity Road stand.

What was it originally called?

Offline Chico Hamilton III

  • Member
  • Posts: 19657
  • Location: South London
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #4079 on: November 23, 2023, 10:35:18 AM »
The Pavilion

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal