To be fair to Street he’s recognised the need for a comprehensive light rail/metro system, it’s in his 2040 vision plan but the issue as ever is getting anyone in Westminster/Treasury/DoT to pay any attention to him and cough up some money to pay for it.
Quote from: AV82EC on September 18, 2023, 02:37:35 PMTo be fair to Street he’s recognised the need for a comprehensive light rail/metro system, it’s in his 2040 vision plan but the issue as ever is getting anyone in Westminster/Treasury/DoT to pay any attention to him and cough up some money to pay for it. Indeed, it's about the only positive thing he's done and it's a bit odd that he's being undermined over it to the extent he is.
Quote from: paul_e on September 18, 2023, 02:46:25 PMQuote from: AV82EC on September 18, 2023, 02:37:35 PMTo be fair to Street he’s recognised the need for a comprehensive light rail/metro system, it’s in his 2040 vision plan but the issue as ever is getting anyone in Westminster/Treasury/DoT to pay any attention to him and cough up some money to pay for it. Indeed, it's about the only positive thing he's done and it's a bit odd that he's being undermined over it to the extent he is. Because it's all London London London, the rest of the country and go and swing, same as the sunsidied travel in London cost millions but they don't give a F because the rest of the country helping to pay for it,
Quote from: astonvilla82 on September 18, 2023, 03:29:51 PMQuote from: paul_e on September 18, 2023, 02:46:25 PMQuote from: AV82EC on September 18, 2023, 02:37:35 PMTo be fair to Street he’s recognised the need for a comprehensive light rail/metro system, it’s in his 2040 vision plan but the issue as ever is getting anyone in Westminster/Treasury/DoT to pay any attention to him and cough up some money to pay for it. Indeed, it's about the only positive thing he's done and it's a bit odd that he's being undermined over it to the extent he is. Because it's all London London London, the rest of the country and go and swing, same as the sunsidied travel in London cost millions but they don't give a F because the rest of the country helping to pay for it,That's it. They do a cost-benefit analysis and cos 35million people potentially benefit from anything in the SE, you compare that with building something in the Midlands, say, or even worse in Wales and the "obvious" choice is to do spend that money in London.It needs a major rethink about how regions are funded.
Crystal Peaks shopping centre sounds sinister. I've got the muzak from Dawn of the Dead as my earworm now.
Crystal Peaks shopping centre sounds sinister. I've got the muzak from Dawn of the Dead as my earworm now.I remember the rows about the workplace parking levy. War on motorists, would destroy the economy, business would leave...
Nottingham has paid for its tram network partly or mostly through a workplace parking levy and some central govt funding. Unsure on Sheffield.
Quote from: AV82EC on September 19, 2023, 09:01:36 AMNottingham has paid for its tram network partly or mostly through a workplace parking levy and some central govt funding. Unsure on Sheffield.Sheffield cost a lot of money, and is owned by the South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive. Operations were sold to Stagecoach for not much money at all and they've done a reasonable job. The South Yorks Mayor has decided not to renew the contract next year and bring it back under public control. Which will probably see it fail and be sold off for peanuts again.Extensions have been mooted before, and there are a few that would make sense. An interesting recent development was the introduction of a tram-train service to Rotherham...the vehicles can adapt to both tram and train lines, and it runs to Rotherham Station from the tramstops in Sheffield, which is really convenient for those making the journey.Perhaps that could work in Birmingham on the rail lines discussed already?