collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Monty
[Today at 02:51:34 PM]


Domestic and European Rugby Union by paul_e
[Today at 02:49:42 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by PaulWinch again
[Today at 02:43:58 PM]


Europa League 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 02:40:26 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Bosco81
[Today at 02:26:10 PM]


Ollie Watkins by cdbearsfan
[Today at 01:45:17 PM]


Standard of Refereeing by Somniloquism
[Today at 12:11:56 PM]


The NFL Thread (with added College Football) by UK Redsox
[Today at 12:07:22 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Villa Park Redevelopment  (Read 1129042 times)

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35493
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8625 on: October 04, 2024, 02:22:59 PM »
I see on the BBC today that Newcastle are considering leaving St James's Park as they look to increase revenue. At least they are involving fans in the process, with the FAB guys etc.

I'm sure they came close back in the 90's, there's a big park behind the one end that they were considering moving to.

Obviously that's ok in other cities but seemingly a big no-no with ours.

Offline Nev

  • Member
  • Posts: 15902
  • Location: Vibrania
  • GM : 03.02.2022
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8626 on: October 04, 2024, 02:58:56 PM »
The stand opposite the main stand at Newcastle backs directly onto some historic terraced housing I think. They can't go any bigger that side.

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35493
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8627 on: October 04, 2024, 03:09:37 PM »
The stand opposite the main stand at Newcastle backs directly onto some historic terraced housing I think. They can't go any bigger that side.

Yes they're similar to us in that respect, but they looked at rebuilding completely on Leazes Park behind the away end in the 90's, which would be the equivalent of us rebuilding on Aston Park.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37102
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8628 on: October 04, 2024, 03:14:52 PM »
The stand opposite the main stand at Newcastle backs directly onto some historic terraced housing I think. They can't go any bigger that side.

Yes they're similar to us in that respect, but they looked at rebuilding completely on Leazes Park behind the away end in the 90's, which would be the equivalent of us rebuilding on Aston Park.

The big difference being the lack of a listed Jacobean mansion in the middle of Leazes park.

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35493
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8629 on: October 04, 2024, 03:21:31 PM »
The stand opposite the main stand at Newcastle backs directly onto some historic terraced housing I think. They can't go any bigger that side.

Yes they're similar to us in that respect, but they looked at rebuilding completely on Leazes Park behind the away end in the 90's, which would be the equivalent of us rebuilding on Aston Park.

The big difference being the lack of a listed Jacobean mansion in the middle of Leazes park.

True, but we've got a prefectly good and pretty underused Jacobean mansion up the road from me in Castle Bromwich, how many do we need? I mean, once you've seen one Jacobean mansion you've seen them all, really.

Offline TelfordVilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 1313
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8630 on: October 04, 2024, 03:26:25 PM »
St James Terrace is behind the stand they want to redevelop. A 'business man' has recently purchased just the 4 car park spaces that serve St James Terrace for the tidy sum of £180,000. I wonder why he did that ?

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43696
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8631 on: October 04, 2024, 03:29:11 PM »
True, but we've got a prefectly good and pretty underused Jacobean mansion up the road from me in Castle Bromwich, how many do we need? I mean, once you've seen one Jacobean mansion you've seen them all, really.
Do you know despite living almost next door for 37 years I have never been inside CB hall however that’s going to be put right as I am going to a wedding in there tonight😊

Offline Chip Butty 111

  • Member
  • Posts: 773
  • Age: 57
  • Location: In the Chip Shop
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8632 on: October 04, 2024, 03:31:21 PM »
I've only been up there once, September 1984 and we lost 3:0, in front of what seemed to be a full house of 31,591. At the time we had a capacity of 48,000,  but Villa Park has gradually shrunk on a hot wash over the years somehow and now 52,000 isn't big enough for Newcastle.

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35493
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8633 on: October 04, 2024, 03:31:28 PM »
True, but we've got a prefectly good and pretty underused Jacobean mansion up the road from me in Castle Bromwich, how many do we need? I mean, once you've seen one Jacobean mansion you've seen them all, really.
Do you know despite living almost next door for 37 years I have never been inside CB hall however that’s going to be put right as I am going to a wedding in there tonight😊

I was saying to my youngest the other week I've not seen the gardens or inside the place in the nigh on 40 years I've lived here.

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35493
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8634 on: October 04, 2024, 03:38:05 PM »
I've only been up there once, September 1984 and we lost 3:0, in front of what seemed to be a full house of 31,591. At the time we had a capacity of 48,000,  but Villa Park has gradually shrunk on a hot wash over the years somehow and now 52,000 isn't big enough for Newcastle.

Their stadium looks like an absolute relic compared to others even in the 70's, it was just three open terraces and a few thousand seats in a main stand built at the turn of the century,
one of the few places undergoing significant development before the Taylor Report.

Offline The Edge

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7448
  • Location: I can see villa park from my bedroom window
  • GM : PCM
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8635 on: October 04, 2024, 03:48:25 PM »
The stand opposite the main stand at Newcastle backs directly onto some historic terraced housing I think. They can't go any bigger that side.

Yes they're similar to us in that respect, but they looked at rebuilding completely on Leazes Park behind the away end in the 90's, which would be the equivalent of us rebuilding on Aston Park.

The big difference being the lack of a listed Jacobean mansion in the middle of Leazes park.
Yeah bit of a problem that lol. I do think we could maybe acquire a chunk of the park and move the ground sideways. 30 metres would be enough and the council are strapped for cash. Obviously the Trinity road would be another issue but not it's something that could be got round. The current Heckonomics ideas where we don't even sell out for a game as massive as the Bayern one clearly don't work. More seats priced reasonably has to be the way forward if we're to carry on with our current trajectory on the pitch.

Offline Chip Butty 111

  • Member
  • Posts: 773
  • Age: 57
  • Location: In the Chip Shop
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8636 on: October 04, 2024, 03:50:34 PM »
I've only been up there once, September 1984 and we lost 3:0, in front of what seemed to be a full house of 31,591. At the time we had a capacity of 48,000,  but Villa Park has gradually shrunk on a hot wash over the years somehow and now 52,000 isn't big enough for Newcastle.

Their stadium looks like an absolute relic compared to others even in the 70's, it was just three open terraces and a few thousand seats in a main stand built at the turn of the century,
one of the few places undergoing significant development before the Taylor Report.
Open terraces each end and not overly impressive at the time, like the Hawthorns with some roofs missing.

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35493
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8637 on: October 04, 2024, 04:01:19 PM »

I've only been up there once, September 1984 and we lost 3:0, in front of what seemed to be a full house of 31,591. At the time we had a capacity of 48,000,  but Villa Park has gradually shrunk on a hot wash over the years somehow and now 52,000 isn't big enough for Newcastle.

Their stadium looks like an absolute relic compared to others even in the 70's, it was just three open terraces and a few thousand seats in a main stand built at the turn of the century,
one of the few places undergoing significant development before the Taylor Report.
Open terraces each end and not overly impressive at the time, like the Hawthorns with some roofs missing.

And that was after improvements!

I remember going to Blackburn in the cup in 1990 before they redeveloped, blimey that was a relic from a bygone era.

Offline Villan82

  • Member
  • Posts: 4224
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8638 on: October 04, 2024, 04:34:35 PM »
A pile of clubs have bigger grounds now than 30 years ago. Villa Park has had a smaller capacity for the past 30 years than it had in May 1994 when the old Holte still stood.

Offline Simon Page

  • Member
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #8639 on: October 04, 2024, 05:11:37 PM »

True, but we've got a prefectly good and pretty underused Jacobean mansion up the road from me in Castle Bromwich, how many do we need? I mean, once you've seen one Jacobean mansion you've seen them all, really.

Once you've seen half a Jacobean house you've seen them all. Eh, architecture fans?

But nothing should encroach on Aston Hall. It's the most magnificent building in the world. Why else did they go easy on it in the Civil Tiff?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal