I would be amazed if any footballer at one of the ESL clubs decided they did not want to play for that team anymore - not one will give up £100k + a week (not a chance, and I don't blame them)Darren Bent was asked the same question this morning, he said he would stay at the club.
Apparently UEFA negotiating a £5.2b deal with Centricus Asset Management, a London based hedge fundCurrently UEFA doles out £3b each yearSo I think I see where this is headingUEFA does the deal based on the new “improved” CL format that was agreed yesterday. The “dirty dozen” were happy with the format but not the allocation of dosh. So, UEFA agrees that the extra £2.2b should go mainly to the 12 to pretty much compensate for the money they would have got from JP Morgan (which was only as upfront loan anyway)The 12 “reluctantly” agree to step back into the fold, claiming that their action was only intended for the good of the game at grass roots levelWe all move on....nothing to see here
Quote from: Clive W on April 20, 2021, 09:19:22 AMApparently UEFA negotiating a £5.2b deal with Centricus Asset Management, a London based hedge fundCurrently UEFA doles out £3b each yearSo I think I see where this is headingUEFA does the deal based on the new “improved” CL format that was agreed yesterday. The “dirty dozen” were happy with the format but not the allocation of dosh. So, UEFA agrees that the extra £2.2b should go mainly to the 12 to pretty much compensate for the money they would have got from JP Morgan (which was only as upfront loan anyway)The 12 “reluctantly” agree to step back into the fold, claiming that their action was only intended for the good of the game at grass roots levelWe all move on....nothing to see here Clive this is my worry as we will end up with worst of both worlds. I wish UEFA had not approved their own proposal yesterday and set it aside for a while. I would rather these weasels are chucked out and we restart with a reset. Keeping them in at the high price they will demand is just slow death.
Good morning. What's wrong with a European Super League and why are so many politicians, here and across Europe, falling over themselves to condemn it? For those of you who have missed it: 11 of Europe's biggest football clubs and Tottenham Hotspur have announced their intention to establish a new midweek tournament in which the 12 clubs play each other, as a replacement for the Champions League.But what distinguishes the new competition from the old is that the 12 founding clubs will have a place at the top table in perpetuity: regardless of how badly they do in either their domestic leagues or in the super league, they will be back in the super league next year. What gives sport its point is that results have consequences - that Arsenal's 1-1 draw with Fulham means that Arsenal's hopes of playing in the Europa League next season are essentially extinguished, and that Fulham's prospects of remaining in the Premier League have also been brought to an end. If there are no meaningful consequences to failure, what's the point? Football without relegation is like a soap opera without unhappy love affairs: what would be the point? Of course, the big bet that the owners of the 12 club are making is that their global fanbases won't care about that: that they can make up for what they lose among their local supporters through global streaming: that there is an audience for soap operas without unhappy love affairs. As it happens, I think they're wrong: the underlying assumption of the Super League's founders that people in Malaysia or Zambia or the States will happily watch games without consequence between Real Madrid and Arsenal is, I think, based on a condescending and ill-judged understanding of the commonality between football fans in Stoke Newington and football fans in Kinshasa. Regardless, the ultimate fate of the scheme rests only in part in the hands of European governments. That's part of why politicians across the continent - from Boris Johnson to Keir Starmer to Emmanuel Macron to the European Commission - have rushed to condemn the move, because the wheeze represents something that all European politicians are wrestling with: the loss of control created by globalisation.Whether they present themselves as the agent of that change, or the tribune of the people left behind, in different ways what they are trying to grapple with is how to maintain not only 'the European way of life' but their own hold on power and relevance in an era in which global capital risks making them seem both powerless and irrelevant. The consequences of the tussle between Europe's politicians and the Super League's founders have implications well beyond football.
hah, another one making the link between this and globalisation. Maybe people are finally waking up when its something they care about getting trashed by it,.
Everton response is majestic.https://www.evertonfc.com/news/2111866