Quote from: Ads on October 12, 2020, 07:27:29 AMSpurs, who've not won the league in 60 years, whose fame appears to derive from a player with a fantastic name scoring a fancy goal in an FA Cup final replay 40 years ago, a "Big 6". Trolololol.I've said before, they're the footballing equivalent of someone that gets by on their looks.
Spurs, who've not won the league in 60 years, whose fame appears to derive from a player with a fantastic name scoring a fancy goal in an FA Cup final replay 40 years ago, a "Big 6". Trolololol.
Reading through this whole thing there are a handful of good ideas, but the vast majority is exactly what you'd expect from a plan backed by ManU and Liverpool. So much of it is about ensuring they make the most money, get the best deals, have access to the most young talent and generally get to do what the fuck they like and the rest of the clubs should just be happy with the scraps they let fall.Ignoring almost all of it though there's 1 line which is clearly the most important bit of the whole thing:"Two-thirds of the long-term shareholders can veto the Premier League board’s approval of a proposed new owner."Whoever decided to include that is a complete and utter c**t and anyone who votes in favour of these proposals whilst that line remains is a complete and utter c**t.