This will get teams talking, but I can’t see it getting voted through. It’ll be like Turkeys voting for Xmas for most teams.
It's an odd parallel universe if Southampton are seen as kingmakers in any way shape or form.
Quote from: frank black on October 11, 2020, 10:29:22 PMThis will get teams talking, but I can’t see it getting voted through. It’ll be like Turkeys voting for Xmas for most teams.Would they still need 14 to initially vote it through?
What utter scumbags they are. A transparent way of ensuring that the so called 'Big 6' don't have their status quo threatened, and end up with a much bigger slice of an already enormous pie so that they can compete with Europe's elite every year. The fact that they've done it on the back of a global pandemic on the pretext of helping the Football League teams is truly disgraceful. Cûnts, the lot of them.
Quote from: tomd2103 on October 12, 2020, 12:34:18 AMQuote from: frank black on October 11, 2020, 10:29:22 PMThis will get teams talking, but I can’t see it getting voted through. It’ll be like Turkeys voting for Xmas for most teams.Would they still need 14 to initially vote it through? I thinks it’s 13 but yes any major change to the rules of Governance require 2/3rd majority.What could happen is the rich and powerful threaten to leave the PL .
Quote from: ChicagoLion on October 12, 2020, 06:48:02 AMQuote from: tomd2103 on October 12, 2020, 12:34:18 AMQuote from: frank black on October 11, 2020, 10:29:22 PMThis will get teams talking, but I can’t see it getting voted through. It’ll be like Turkeys voting for Xmas for most teams.Would they still need 14 to initially vote it through? I thinks it’s 13 but yes any major change to the rules of Governance require 2/3rd majority.What could happen is the rich and powerful threaten to leave the PL .Would that not be a good thing?
Spurs, who've not won the league in 60 years, whose fame appears to derive from a player with a fantastic name scoring a fancy goal in an FA Cup final replay 40 years ago, a "Big 6". Trolololol.
...Ignoring almost all of it though there's 1 line which is clearly the most important bit of the whole thing:"Two-thirds of the long-term shareholders can veto the Premier League board’s approval of a proposed new owner."...
There is no mention of Aston Villa and [The Barcodes], both of whom have featured in more Premier League campaigns than Manchester [Citeh].