It was just the Trinity and North Stand corner. The Holte and Witton lane remained separate.
What would the capacity have been if they were built?
I'm some someone like Cowdenbeath had planning permission to expand to 150,000 until World War Two intervened. I'm sure that would have been full every game.
Quote from: London Villan on August 13, 2020, 02:54:31 PMive never seen these plans before. They look pretty good. The plans I saw I think were from more recently. Or maybe just didn’t include the facade. I’d be happy if we built this and it looked like it does in the renders.
Interesting pictures. Reminds me of Newcastle which isn’t necessarily a bad thing as St James’ is impressive. For me, the priory should be doing the North Stand and DE stand at the same time and possibly join those two stands instead. They’re both no longer fit for purpose (concourse and facilities wise at least) so a bit of joined up thinking would be better than doing one stand, then think of doing the next one 5-10 years later.
Quote from: Marlon From Bearwood on August 14, 2020, 08:11:46 AMInteresting pictures. Reminds me of Newcastle which isn’t necessarily a bad thing as St James’ is impressive. For me, the priory should be doing the North Stand and DE stand at the same time and possibly join those two stands instead. They’re both no longer fit for purpose (concourse and facilities wise at least) so a bit of joined up thinking would be better than doing one stand, then think of doing the next one 5-10 years later. I’m not a fan of St James’ Park, it’s too lopsided. It looks like someone’s cut-and-shut it with the Bescot.
Quote from: cdbullyweefan on August 13, 2020, 01:34:29 PMI'm some someone like Cowdenbeath had planning permission to expand to 150,000 until World War Two intervened. I'm sure that would have been full every game.Didn’t Port Vale plan to build a 100,000 “Wembley of the North” Stadium after the war?