Getting hammered by Leicester early Dec gave us the jitters and we never truly recovered. I was still optimistic we could do when we were sitting on seven wins at the end of Jan. But a lack of nous alongside Mings at centre half and minimal goal threat have done for us. Our outlay in the summer was largely an advance on the TV deal. If the owners were determined to avoid relegation we needed more: a Premier League ready centre half alongside Tyrone, a competent defensive midfielder to allow Grealish and McGinn to do their thing and goals up top. Not the half baked experimentation they ultimately went with. Cahill or Shane Duffy from Brighton were available, and after Leicester struggled last season, I wonde if Rodgers had received a £30 million plus offer for Vardy in the summer whether he would have cashed in. They're not short of money, but it would have been more in the pot to reshape a young side the way he wants it. Vardy isn't one for the future but him (or a player of that ilk) could have been ideal for us for a year or two as we attempted to reestablish ourselves. Oh well.
Quote from: KevinGage on June 27, 2020, 05:25:47 PMGetting hammered by Leicester early Dec gave us the jitters and we never truly recovered. I was still optimistic we could do when we were sitting on seven wins at the end of Jan. But a lack of nous alongside Mings at centre half and minimal goal threat have done for us. Our outlay in the summer was largely an advance on the TV deal. If the owners were determined to avoid relegation we needed more: a Premier League ready centre half alongside Tyrone, a competent defensive midfielder to allow Grealish and McGinn to do their thing and goals up top. Not the half baked experimentation they ultimately went with. Cahill or Shane Duffy from Brighton were available, and after Leicester struggled last season, I wonde if Rodgers had received a £30 million plus offer for Vardy in the summer whether he would have cashed in. They're not short of money, but it would have been more in the pot to reshape a young side the way he wants it. Vardy isn't one for the future but him (or a player of that ilk) could have been ideal for us for a year or two as we attempted to reestablish ourselves. Oh well. Yes Leicester was the start really. Before that game we were hovering above bottom 3 but we'd been competitive in majority of games and no one was hammering us. We'd beaten Newcastle comfortably, more than held our own at Old Trafford and were outplayed at Chelsea but only lost 2-1 so plenty of hope.Lost Sir Ron the night before. Everyone expected a performance to remember as a tribute but it was the total opposite. That was certainly the day we were found out defensively in the premier league and we've never really recovered it. Things like Mings getting injured but staying on long enough to see Vardy run away and score.Leicester game started the decline this season. Spurs at home mentally relegated us.
Treading into contentious territory here, but the owners have been marvellous in pouring money into the club, you can't doubt their commitment.But their judgement on this?Questionable?
Billionaire owners, Brentford manager. Bit underwhelming really.
Quote from: SoccerHQ on June 28, 2020, 12:36:21 AMQuote from: KevinGage on June 27, 2020, 05:25:47 PMGetting hammered by Leicester early Dec gave us the jitters and we never truly recovered. I was still optimistic we could do when we were sitting on seven wins at the end of Jan. But a lack of nous alongside Mings at centre half and minimal goal threat have done for us. Our outlay in the summer was largely an advance on the TV deal. If the owners were determined to avoid relegation we needed more: a Premier League ready centre half alongside Tyrone, a competent defensive midfielder to allow Grealish and McGinn to do their thing and goals up top. Not the half baked experimentation they ultimately went with. Cahill or Shane Duffy from Brighton were available, and after Leicester struggled last season, I wonde if Rodgers had received a £30 million plus offer for Vardy in the summer whether he would have cashed in. They're not short of money, but it would have been more in the pot to reshape a young side the way he wants it. Vardy isn't one for the future but him (or a player of that ilk) could have been ideal for us for a year or two as we attempted to reestablish ourselves. Oh well. Yes Leicester was the start really. Before that game we were hovering above bottom 3 but we'd been competitive in majority of games and no one was hammering us. We'd beaten Newcastle comfortably, more than held our own at Old Trafford and were outplayed at Chelsea but only lost 2-1 so plenty of hope.Lost Sir Ron the night before. Everyone expected a performance to remember as a tribute but it was the total opposite. That was certainly the day we were found out defensively in the premier league and we've never really recovered it. Things like Mings getting injured but staying on long enough to see Vardy run away and score.Leicester game started the decline this season. Spurs at home mentally relegated us.The best run we had all season was after Leicester.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on June 28, 2020, 12:38:34 AMQuote from: SoccerHQ on June 28, 2020, 12:36:21 AMQuote from: KevinGage on June 27, 2020, 05:25:47 PMGetting hammered by Leicester early Dec gave us the jitters and we never truly recovered. I was still optimistic we could do when we were sitting on seven wins at the end of Jan. But a lack of nous alongside Mings at centre half and minimal goal threat have done for us. Our outlay in the summer was largely an advance on the TV deal. If the owners were determined to avoid relegation we needed more: a Premier League ready centre half alongside Tyrone, a competent defensive midfielder to allow Grealish and McGinn to do their thing and goals up top. Not the half baked experimentation they ultimately went with. Cahill or Shane Duffy from Brighton were available, and after Leicester struggled last season, I wonde if Rodgers had received a £30 million plus offer for Vardy in the summer whether he would have cashed in. They're not short of money, but it would have been more in the pot to reshape a young side the way he wants it. Vardy isn't one for the future but him (or a player of that ilk) could have been ideal for us for a year or two as we attempted to reestablish ourselves. Oh well. Yes Leicester was the start really. Before that game we were hovering above bottom 3 but we'd been competitive in majority of games and no one was hammering us. We'd beaten Newcastle comfortably, more than held our own at Old Trafford and were outplayed at Chelsea but only lost 2-1 so plenty of hope.Lost Sir Ron the night before. Everyone expected a performance to remember as a tribute but it was the total opposite. That was certainly the day we were found out defensively in the premier league and we've never really recovered it. Things like Mings getting injured but staying on long enough to see Vardy run away and score.Leicester game started the decline this season. Spurs at home mentally relegated us.The best run we had all season was after Leicester. League game. After that we lost to Sheffield United, Southampton and Watford in next 4 games and were terrible in all of them particularly at the back. Southampton and Watford were also still below us in the league at the time so did us mentally aswell seeing these adrift teams going above us and more than likely finish above us now.
From the moment Lerner turned the taps off too far and too fast, the decision making at this club has been atrocious. Owner after owner, CEO after CEO, manager after manager, transfer after transfer, it never seems to get any better. One of the worst, in terms of how it will affect the club for the future, was not sacking Dean in December.