collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Victor Lindelöf - done by Louzie0
[Today at 06:47:04 PM]


Athletics 2025 by Villa Lew
[Today at 06:36:59 PM]


GUESS THE GOAL R3: Carabao🏆 Brentford v VILLA, Tuesday 16th September!🥅 by Louzie0
[Today at 06:36:46 PM]


Brentford vs Aston Villa LC Rd3 - pre match chat by ozzjim
[Today at 06:26:36 PM]


Unai Emery by Drummond
[Today at 05:44:34 PM]


Ross Barkley by eamonn
[Today at 05:07:20 PM]


Everton vs Aston Villa Post-Match Thread by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 04:51:53 PM]


Europa League 2025-26 by Lsvilla
[Today at 03:41:05 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread  (Read 27254 times)

Offline Fred Crump

  • Member
  • Posts: 1419
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #180 on: January 05, 2020, 11:36:24 AM »
I think Jota has some value, and clearly has some talent on the ball, but he can't deliver in the formation we play or in the position he's being asked to play.  Last season, when we were having more of the ball and the challenge was breaking down a team in the final third, he's exactly the sort of player you could look to bring off the bench, and with a decent bit of possession in the final third he is likely to spot a pass and create something.  But the simple fact is, the way we're playing this season, he simply doesn't add anything.  He's not quick enough to play as one of the front three in a 4-3-3 and not mobile enough to play in the middle three when we spend most of our time defending.


I can see why we brought him in, but given how the season has panned out, I'm not sure he should be near the 11. It's not his fault, he was bought to play a role we thought we'd need but ultimately don't at the moment.

The more I think about the more I believe the Jota deal for Gardner was done when we believed we’d still be in the Championship this year.

It was a very lazy signing from Smith. He obviously rated him from his Brentford days but the step up at Jota's age was always going to be a struggle. Has absolutely no chance of making it on the right wing.

One in the eye for those who say people get more right wing as they get older.

👏 👏 👏

Online john e

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20631
  • GM : 28.06.2024
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #181 on: January 05, 2020, 11:49:04 AM »
All those criticising the selection yesterday would have been similarly annoyed had we gone full strength and Grealish, for instance, had picked up a long term injury. Smith’s job is also about squad management and priorities and given events at Burnley his hand was forced. For the long term prospects of the club the league has to come first.

no problem with the team selection
but the team didn’t want to be there they didn’t care didn’t even bother trying

the performance was shit and that’s the players fault and a Smiths

they should have been made to walk home

Offline SoccerHQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 43282
  • Location: Down, down, deeper and Down.
  • GM : 19.06.2021
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #182 on: January 05, 2020, 11:59:27 AM »
Since we first played in the FA Cup in 1879 our record is now

First 41 years 6 times we've won the Cup last 100 years once.

As Sven would say 'first 41 years good last 100 years not so good'



I know people rant about us not doing much about it in the modern age which is true given all the 3rd/4th round knock outs since 2000 but we've still made the final twice in that time.

To not make one final from the 60s right up to 2000 is very poor considering we did have the teams back given they won in europe and the league.

That's the period to look back on and wonder why we didn't do more in the competition considering likes of Watford, Coventry and West Ham were either making the final or actually winning the competition.

Actually just watched most of the 86 cup final between Liverpool and Everton on the red button. A completely different era where backpasses could be picked up and hardly a yellow card or substitution but I thought the standard was pretty mediocre, endless long balls pumped up from both teams and poor passing.

Offline BoVillan esq

  • Member
  • Posts: 2074
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #183 on: January 05, 2020, 12:06:56 PM »
Terrible game.
Terrible ground.
Terrible atmosphere.
Terrible performance.
Terrible opposition.
Terrible builders.
Terrible Taylor.
Terrible Engels.
Terrible Hourihane.
Terrible Lansbury.
Terrible Nakamba.
Terrible El Ghazi.
Terrible Jota.
Terrible open system.
Terrible lack of pace.
Terrible lack structure.
Terrible lack of quality.
Terrible lack of synonyms.

And now my hand is cold. Oh well, at least we didn't draw.

But apart from all that - a good day out, no?!

Lets put it this way, he's not a happy bunny.

Offline BoVillan esq

  • Member
  • Posts: 2074
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #184 on: January 05, 2020, 12:10:19 PM »
I'm light years ahead of Lansbury and I'm nearly 50, fat, ugly, bald, crap at football and have failing eyesight.

Come of it, you're being way to hard on yourself, with those credentials you'd walk into this Villa side, get your boots.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 76489
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #185 on: January 05, 2020, 02:14:32 PM »
In fairness when we had a decent team 77-85 we had some horrible draws.

77 Man Utd (A) Round 6
78 Everton (A) 3
79 Forest (A) 3
80 West Ham (A) 6, when Ken decided to wave to someone in the crowd in the last minute as West Ham slung a cross in
81 Ipswich (A) 3
82 Spurs (A) 5
83 Arsenal (A) 6
84 the one poor one, losing a replay away to Norwich in round 3
85 Liverpool (A) 3

Offline ez

  • Member
  • Posts: 9939
  • Location: Stratford on Avon
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #186 on: January 05, 2020, 03:48:57 PM »
All those criticising the selection yesterday would have been similarly annoyed had we gone full strength and Grealish, for instance, had picked up a long term injury. Smith’s job is also about squad management and priorities and given events at Burnley his hand was forced. For the long term prospects of the club the league has to come first.

no problem with the team selection
but the team didn’t want to be there they didn’t care didn’t even bother trying

the performance was shit and that’s the players fault and a Smiths

they should have been made to walk home

That's the biggest disappointment for me, the fringe players not stepping up.

Offline Damo70

  • Member
  • Posts: 30877
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #187 on: January 05, 2020, 06:04:23 PM »
In fairness when we had a decent team 77-85 we had some horrible draws.

77 Man Utd (A) Round 6
78 Everton (A) 3
79 Forest (A) 3
80 West Ham (A) 6, when Ken decided to wave to someone in the crowd in the last minute as West Ham slung a cross in
81 Ipswich (A) 3
82 Spurs (A) 5
83 Arsenal (A) 6
84 the one poor one, losing a replay away to Norwich in round 3
85 Liverpool (A) 3


1980 and 1992 were missed opportunities, as were the two finals we qualified for but didn't turn up for.

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 34104
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #188 on: January 05, 2020, 06:34:37 PM »
In '92 I think we were in the middle of our six game scoreless drought when Liverpool beat us 1-0. A pity as we took four points off them that season in the league and only finished just below them in the table.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 76489
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #189 on: January 05, 2020, 06:42:49 PM »
1 goal in 11 league games, 5 goaless games either side of a 1-0 home win over Oldham.

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 34104
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #190 on: January 05, 2020, 06:59:23 PM »
Even Lambert and Garde couldn't manage that.

Offline AV82EC

  • Member
  • Posts: 12453
  • Location: Macclesfield
  • GM : 22.02.2024
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #191 on: January 05, 2020, 07:23:21 PM »
1 goal in 11 league games, 5 goaless games either side of a 1-0 home win over Oldham.

Was it the Norwich home game that broke the duck? Quickly followed by stuffing Spurs 5-2.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 76489
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #192 on: January 05, 2020, 07:47:09 PM »
The games either side of the 11 game run were against Norwich, we scored 1 in both the Norwich games. So we went to WHL having scored 3 in 11 and then rattled 5 in.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • Posts: 74872
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #193 on: January 05, 2020, 07:52:00 PM »
The thing I remember most about the 2015 FAC campaign was the fact that the semi final was about as good as a football match gets, whereas the final was about as bad as it gets.

Offline garyshawsknee

  • Member
  • Posts: 5899
  • Location: Hove via Brighton, via Luton
  • GM : 03.06.2020
Re: Fulham v Aston Villa Post Match Thread
« Reply #194 on: January 05, 2020, 08:03:04 PM »
In fairness when we had a decent team 77-85 we had some horrible draws.

77 Man Utd (A) Round 6
78 Everton (A) 3
79 Forest (A) 3
80 West Ham (A) 6, when Ken decided to wave to someone in the crowd in the last minute as West Ham slung a cross in
81 Ipswich (A) 3
82 Spurs (A) 5
83 Arsenal (A) 6
84 the one poor one, losing a replay away to Norwich in round 3
85 Liverpool (A) 3


1980 and 1992 were missed opportunities, as were the two finals we qualified for but didn't turn up for.

I've only just recovered from Oldham in 1990.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal