Quote from: Damo70 on August 11, 2019, 11:45:43 AMFootball is all about opinions. The ex pros summerising for SKY last night were very positive in their opinion of how Villa played and optimistic about our chances this season. The journalists on The Sunday Supplement this morning were critical of us and felt we were very negative in our play and based on what they saw didn't think we would have a good season.Saw that , comparing us with Norwich , but the difference was Norwich probably went for it being 4 0 down where we were 1 0 up , If norwich had been 1 0 up , of course they would have had 11 men behind the ball. But blimey away from home against the chump league finalist with one player costing half of our 13 players we brought in , give us a break and theres only another 2 teams as good as Spurzzz 3-0 up and it might have been a different game .
Football is all about opinions. The ex pros summerising for SKY last night were very positive in their opinion of how Villa played and optimistic about our chances this season. The journalists on The Sunday Supplement this morning were critical of us and felt we were very negative in our play and based on what they saw didn't think we would have a good season.
Haven't done a scores thing for a while, so here's mine:Heaton - 8 - Organised things well, some very good saves and nothing much he could do for their goals.Elmohamady - 6 - harsh introduction to life back in the top flight with an instant give away, but recovered after that.Engels - 9 - one of the best debuts I've seen. Commanding, good relationship with Mings and Heaton, extremely promisingMings - 9 - my Villa MOTM by a whisker - put his body on the line, and every other part as well - imperious.Taylor - 7 - best defensive display from him in a whileHourihane - 5 - the sort of display I expected from him, just didn't add very much at all in any area, and even his dead balls were poorMcGinn - 6.5 - good goal and a couple of nice passes, but then was overrun with the rest of themGrealish - 5.5 - one nice run and good ball, but looked poor second half and bad mistake for their goal.Trezeguet - 7 - most promising of the attacking players but needs to take his chancesEl Ghazi - 5 - looked out of his depth and didn't track back nearly enoughWesley - 5.5 - difficult introduction to the Premier League. Put himself about a bit though, although looked a bit sulky at times. Liked how he held one of their defenders off for the goal and another chance though.SubsJota - 3 - difficult entry and not the sub I'd have made, but looked completely and utterly out of his depth. Hardly touched the ball and when he did, gave it away mainlyKodjia - 4 - minimal impact when he came onLuiz - 6 - added energy and bite to the midfield, but too little too late, should have come on when Jota did and we may have held out.
Rich, not necessarily big.
There's a lot of worrying about Jack giving the ball away late on, or about our physical deficit compared to them in general - but let's not forget that this Spurs side might just be the fittest, best pressing side in the world. In our first game in the Premier League, to hold them off and nearly get something from the game, looking quite good in the process? That's very positive. Let's wait to judge this side after ten games.
Custis is a dour sod, always criticises, would take his opinion very lightly.
Quote from: garyshawsknee on August 11, 2019, 07:25:08 PMCustis is a dour sod, always criticises, would take his opinion very lightly. Is he the one who is basically in love with Mourinho? He’s bloody dreadful.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on August 11, 2019, 09:48:54 PMQuote from: garyshawsknee on August 11, 2019, 07:25:08 PMCustis is a dour sod, always criticises, would take his opinion very lightly. Is he the one who is basically in love with Mourinho? He’s bloody dreadful.Oh yeah, in a creepy way