Is that the big line thing that looks like the setting of a sci-fi film?
Quote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 05:20:42 PMQuote from: Dave on June 12, 2024, 03:55:35 PMQuote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 03:52:29 PMQuote from: Dave on June 12, 2024, 01:39:03 PMQuote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 01:37:28 PMQuote from: Dave on June 12, 2024, 01:22:56 PMQuote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 01:14:19 PMI agree with that, people can try to put a positive spin on it, but it's fucking shit. If these rules weren't there we'd be laughing Juve out of town with this offer for one of our best players. It's utter shit. And if these rules weren't there then Newcastle would have spent £600m last summer, we'd (maybe) have finished fifth and DL, Martinez and Watkins would all be looking for a move this summer.Counter-factuals work in more than one way. That's quite a leap from the example of us having to sell a key player to bring us under a set figure decided on by the clubs a while back, which hasn't changed with inflation etc, despite having the season of our lives. Maybe this, maybe that, maybe the other. The speculation that seems the most likely is that we HAVE to sell to meet these rules, which in their current form are shit. It's not a leap to suggest that the current shit rules being changed to benefit us, might benefit other rival clubs more.No, but to suggest Newcastle would've spent 600m, we'd finish 5th and have to sell all our top players is quite an OTT doomsday scenario. You believe there is a plausible scenario that if the spending rules didn't exist (which is what you're saying is causing us a problem), Newcastle wouldn't be spending hundreds of millions of pounds in an attempt to finish in the Champions League places?I'm saying the shit rules that are forcing us to accept a shit offer for one of best players are shit rules. You've said the rest. Because you appear to be oblivious of the fact that those rules aren't constraining only us.
Quote from: Dave on June 12, 2024, 03:55:35 PMQuote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 03:52:29 PMQuote from: Dave on June 12, 2024, 01:39:03 PMQuote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 01:37:28 PMQuote from: Dave on June 12, 2024, 01:22:56 PMQuote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 01:14:19 PMI agree with that, people can try to put a positive spin on it, but it's fucking shit. If these rules weren't there we'd be laughing Juve out of town with this offer for one of our best players. It's utter shit. And if these rules weren't there then Newcastle would have spent £600m last summer, we'd (maybe) have finished fifth and DL, Martinez and Watkins would all be looking for a move this summer.Counter-factuals work in more than one way. That's quite a leap from the example of us having to sell a key player to bring us under a set figure decided on by the clubs a while back, which hasn't changed with inflation etc, despite having the season of our lives. Maybe this, maybe that, maybe the other. The speculation that seems the most likely is that we HAVE to sell to meet these rules, which in their current form are shit. It's not a leap to suggest that the current shit rules being changed to benefit us, might benefit other rival clubs more.No, but to suggest Newcastle would've spent 600m, we'd finish 5th and have to sell all our top players is quite an OTT doomsday scenario. You believe there is a plausible scenario that if the spending rules didn't exist (which is what you're saying is causing us a problem), Newcastle wouldn't be spending hundreds of millions of pounds in an attempt to finish in the Champions League places?I'm saying the shit rules that are forcing us to accept a shit offer for one of best players are shit rules. You've said the rest.
Quote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 03:52:29 PMQuote from: Dave on June 12, 2024, 01:39:03 PMQuote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 01:37:28 PMQuote from: Dave on June 12, 2024, 01:22:56 PMQuote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 01:14:19 PMI agree with that, people can try to put a positive spin on it, but it's fucking shit. If these rules weren't there we'd be laughing Juve out of town with this offer for one of our best players. It's utter shit. And if these rules weren't there then Newcastle would have spent £600m last summer, we'd (maybe) have finished fifth and DL, Martinez and Watkins would all be looking for a move this summer.Counter-factuals work in more than one way. That's quite a leap from the example of us having to sell a key player to bring us under a set figure decided on by the clubs a while back, which hasn't changed with inflation etc, despite having the season of our lives. Maybe this, maybe that, maybe the other. The speculation that seems the most likely is that we HAVE to sell to meet these rules, which in their current form are shit. It's not a leap to suggest that the current shit rules being changed to benefit us, might benefit other rival clubs more.No, but to suggest Newcastle would've spent 600m, we'd finish 5th and have to sell all our top players is quite an OTT doomsday scenario. You believe there is a plausible scenario that if the spending rules didn't exist (which is what you're saying is causing us a problem), Newcastle wouldn't be spending hundreds of millions of pounds in an attempt to finish in the Champions League places?
Quote from: Dave on June 12, 2024, 01:39:03 PMQuote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 01:37:28 PMQuote from: Dave on June 12, 2024, 01:22:56 PMQuote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 01:14:19 PMI agree with that, people can try to put a positive spin on it, but it's fucking shit. If these rules weren't there we'd be laughing Juve out of town with this offer for one of our best players. It's utter shit. And if these rules weren't there then Newcastle would have spent £600m last summer, we'd (maybe) have finished fifth and DL, Martinez and Watkins would all be looking for a move this summer.Counter-factuals work in more than one way. That's quite a leap from the example of us having to sell a key player to bring us under a set figure decided on by the clubs a while back, which hasn't changed with inflation etc, despite having the season of our lives. Maybe this, maybe that, maybe the other. The speculation that seems the most likely is that we HAVE to sell to meet these rules, which in their current form are shit. It's not a leap to suggest that the current shit rules being changed to benefit us, might benefit other rival clubs more.No, but to suggest Newcastle would've spent 600m, we'd finish 5th and have to sell all our top players is quite an OTT doomsday scenario.
Quote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 01:37:28 PMQuote from: Dave on June 12, 2024, 01:22:56 PMQuote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 01:14:19 PMI agree with that, people can try to put a positive spin on it, but it's fucking shit. If these rules weren't there we'd be laughing Juve out of town with this offer for one of our best players. It's utter shit. And if these rules weren't there then Newcastle would have spent £600m last summer, we'd (maybe) have finished fifth and DL, Martinez and Watkins would all be looking for a move this summer.Counter-factuals work in more than one way. That's quite a leap from the example of us having to sell a key player to bring us under a set figure decided on by the clubs a while back, which hasn't changed with inflation etc, despite having the season of our lives. Maybe this, maybe that, maybe the other. The speculation that seems the most likely is that we HAVE to sell to meet these rules, which in their current form are shit. It's not a leap to suggest that the current shit rules being changed to benefit us, might benefit other rival clubs more.
Quote from: Dave on June 12, 2024, 01:22:56 PMQuote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 01:14:19 PMI agree with that, people can try to put a positive spin on it, but it's fucking shit. If these rules weren't there we'd be laughing Juve out of town with this offer for one of our best players. It's utter shit. And if these rules weren't there then Newcastle would have spent £600m last summer, we'd (maybe) have finished fifth and DL, Martinez and Watkins would all be looking for a move this summer.Counter-factuals work in more than one way. That's quite a leap from the example of us having to sell a key player to bring us under a set figure decided on by the clubs a while back, which hasn't changed with inflation etc, despite having the season of our lives. Maybe this, maybe that, maybe the other. The speculation that seems the most likely is that we HAVE to sell to meet these rules, which in their current form are shit.
Quote from: Goldenballs on June 12, 2024, 01:14:19 PMI agree with that, people can try to put a positive spin on it, but it's fucking shit. If these rules weren't there we'd be laughing Juve out of town with this offer for one of our best players. It's utter shit. And if these rules weren't there then Newcastle would have spent £600m last summer, we'd (maybe) have finished fifth and DL, Martinez and Watkins would all be looking for a move this summer.Counter-factuals work in more than one way.
I agree with that, people can try to put a positive spin on it, but it's fucking shit. If these rules weren't there we'd be laughing Juve out of town with this offer for one of our best players. It's utter shit.
In Unai we trust."I also tend to hold on to this. After all it need a man who knows what he is doing to make so wholesome changes that seems to be going on when our team and players has been so successful over lat 15 or so months. Exciting times. I will miss Douglas though if he is going.
Doug at his best is very very good, but in reality in 5 years he we didn't see it enough. Go back in this thread and I bet there's been plenty about how poor he was at times for months at a time. His overall form was closer to post Xmas than 2023.
In Unai we trust.
Quote from: LeeB on June 12, 2024, 06:06:55 PMDesert Telford. Christ, please, not even in jest.
Desert Telford.
He had a very lucrative contract on his lap for the last 5 months and hasn’t signed it. After season ended he made it clear he wouldn’t be either. Therefore club has acted to get value
Quote from: VinnieChase84 on June 12, 2024, 09:20:15 PMHe had a very lucrative contract on his lap for the last 5 months and hasn’t signed it. After season ended he made it clear he wouldn’t be either. Therefore club has acted to get value That makes sense in terms of why we're selling him (along with his relative lack of physicality).I'm still puzzled as to why he wants to go from the Premier League to Juve in Serie A.