Yeah, that's a crazy take.
Obviously a crazy take, but presumably a new-contract-signed Kamara would be going for £80m not £40m.So Kamara going plus a load more financial freedom would make it less crazy.
I think you’ll find it’s a three year deal so we can pay his wages over longer.
The original post with videohttps://www.instagram.com/p/DNdkPJyqxAg
Quote from: eamonn on Today at 07:06:47 PMViews on his departure seem pretty split. It would be interesting to see a poll over who is ok with him going for the reported fee and who isn't.I think it's dreadful news, if a big name had to go one or either of Konsa or Kamara would have preferable.
Views on his departure seem pretty split. It would be interesting to see a poll over who is ok with him going for the reported fee and who isn't.
Quote from: kippaxvilla2 on Today at 08:53:39 PMI think you’ll find it’s a three year deal so we can pay his wages over longer. You mean his transfer fee. The longer the deal, the longer the wages impact our 70% figure. With him offering a lot more goals and assists than JJ, we're more likely to finish in the Champions League/win Europa, which would keep the turnover charge on. A bigger total sum to take 70% from. But still, we shouldn't be forced to sell JJ for no particular reason.