It will be interesting where he plays though (or who he replaces in the squad). He plays left wing / left midfield for us so you assume similar for them. First choice there is Gordan/Barnes for the wing. Midfield behind is normally Joelinton, Tonali and Guimarăes. My guess will be Joelinton's position will be shared with JJ, although the former did go from a very shit striker to quiet a decent midfielder in that position. Of course whilst Isak if playing silly buggers, Gordan is forward so a further spot is open for JJ at the moment. Howe has also done a lot of experimentation with 3-5-3 with Livramento as wingback.
I think it’s probably reasonably straightforward - did we actively want to sell JJ? Probably not. But equally we’re in a position where virtually anyone, if not everyone, is sellable under the right conditions. In this case JJ was offered terms, but we couldn’t meet in the middle - he had a view of his value and our view differed. Therefore selling now is right for all parties.
We're the cheating bastards managing 4 seasons of European football in only 3 seasons.
Quote from: villa for life on Today at 08:48:03 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on Today at 08:46:06 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on Today at 08:17:21 PMYou’re conflating some things though Bronte. What we did with Duran is very strong recruitment, you buy low and either have picked up a talent who could augment the team or you move them on for a huge profit. Our forward line being weaker currently, is about the constraints related to UEFA competition, specifically the one placed on us in respect of the “A” squad. Exactly this.Totally. Duran and Rogers have been the bright spots of our recruitment in the last few seasons. Yeah, but what I was saying was that you saying:Quote from: villa for life on Today at 07:17:38 PMSpot on. Our recruitment the last few years has not been great, and changing this is our route to a brighter future. People ask how can we compete with the likes of Liverpool and city etc? Well, think of Bournemouth, Brighton , Palace , Brentford and forest who have had even less transfer budget and don’t /can’t pay the kind of wages we do. What must they be thinking? Doesn't stand up to analysis because:1. We've somehow managed to engage in 'not great' recruitment and yet manage to reach the QF of the Champions League and the semi final of another European competition, qualify for Europe 4 years on the bounce, and finish in the top six on more than one occasion. So how can it be 'not great', given that?and:2. You then referred to those other clubs and their view of what we do, when we have to do exactly the sort of thing they do - ie buy and sell players for profit - and that's the very fact that currently leads us to doing stuff like selling Ramsey.I do apologise for comparing you to Tim, though, that was a pretty low blow.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on Today at 08:46:06 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on Today at 08:17:21 PMYou’re conflating some things though Bronte. What we did with Duran is very strong recruitment, you buy low and either have picked up a talent who could augment the team or you move them on for a huge profit. Our forward line being weaker currently, is about the constraints related to UEFA competition, specifically the one placed on us in respect of the “A” squad. Exactly this.Totally. Duran and Rogers have been the bright spots of our recruitment in the last few seasons.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on Today at 08:17:21 PMYou’re conflating some things though Bronte. What we did with Duran is very strong recruitment, you buy low and either have picked up a talent who could augment the team or you move them on for a huge profit. Our forward line being weaker currently, is about the constraints related to UEFA competition, specifically the one placed on us in respect of the “A” squad. Exactly this.
You’re conflating some things though Bronte. What we did with Duran is very strong recruitment, you buy low and either have picked up a talent who could augment the team or you move them on for a huge profit. Our forward line being weaker currently, is about the constraints related to UEFA competition, specifically the one placed on us in respect of the “A” squad.
Spot on. Our recruitment the last few years has not been great, and changing this is our route to a brighter future. People ask how can we compete with the likes of Liverpool and city etc? Well, think of Bournemouth, Brighton , Palace , Brentford and forest who have had even less transfer budget and don’t /can’t pay the kind of wages we do. What must they be thinking?
You said “ I suppose comparing you to Tim does deserve an apology”That is reference to me. (Not my opinions )
The idea of Bailey being a bad signing is odd too. Yes disappointing his form hasn’t matched the year before last in his time at Villa. But that one year he was one of the best players in the league and was essential in us finishing top 4. That alone, without whatever we sell him for, is net positive in terms of value.
Yep, Grealish has scored loads against us.
On balance it is good business - I just hope we are able to flex some muscle with the proceeds. He maybe thought he was never going to be first choice. It's always sad to see a homegrown lad go, but with Buendia I guess Unai has seen something different as to how we can attack.Good luck to him - needs a good run being injury free.