Quote from: villa for life on Today at 07:37:12 PMYour post is verging on abusive. Please apologize to Tim. Mods, have a word.Nobody mentioned the words “proper shit recruitment”. Please also mind your manners .I suppose comparing you to Tim does deserve an apology, I don't think Tim has repeatedly advised us to sell a current World Cup winner and two time Yashin holder yet. But he did always advocate we should get Bamford in so swings and roundabouts.
Your post is verging on abusive. Please apologize to Tim. Mods, have a word.Nobody mentioned the words “proper shit recruitment”. Please also mind your manners .
Don’t get personal. Be civil and keep it to football.
Quote from: LeonW on Today at 07:31:12 PMQuote from: brontebilly on Today at 07:03:01 PMQuote from: LeonW on Today at 05:34:35 PMWe haven’t really been stung on the sales front. Targett, Grealish, Ings, Duran, Diaby, Luiz; I think we’ve won on all fronts and been smart. But this one could be different.Not sure about that at all. No matter what we sell players for, it's not worth all that much if the funds aren't reinvested to make the team better.Grealish - replaced by Ings, Bailey and Buendia. Frankly a disaster that cost Deano his job, still trying to get rid of two of the three of them.Luiz - yes Tielemans did a great job replacing his influence as our playmaker last season but Luiz was replaced in the squad by Onana, I'll be kind and say a dud thus far. Ings, yes and credit to Emery there. Hard decision but Watkins thrived immediately without him and Ings was done.Duran - big profit made on him but it's all relative. He was a ready made Watkins replacement and we are now more reliant on Ollie than ever.Diaby - maybe Malen will provide that direct pace option he brought, Rogers has stepped into the breach with more potential to be fair. Targett - was it Digne who replaced him? Fine I guess, cheers Stevie GI’m very much counting trading out as different to trading in although I would take the point that they directly correlate. But following that view, based on the above:• Grealish- you have to factor in the pure profit element. Plus, without doing the maths, I wonder how close it is on goals/assist from the 3 recruited players VS just Grealish. The wages also. • Tielemans was the Luiz replacement and that’s been an upgrade.• Ings was replaced with Duran. A better longer term prospect as evidenced by his progress and finally sale amount. • Duran was great business. I doubt anyone will get anywhere close to what we got during the rest of his career. His behaviour effectively forced our hand. With a bit more patience on his part, he could have legitimately been our number one striker by now. • Diaby - not quite sure who directly replaced him. Combination of Rodgers/Malen?• Targett replaced with Digne - massive upgrade.Don’t forget Philogene (“thinks that, I am on the one” -will get my coat).That pure profit argument is one I hate to be honest and no doubt it's the same reason why Ramsey was sold today. Grealish was a bad sale for us, maybe not the best buy for Citeh either. Spurs & Bale comes to mind. We can agree to disagree on Luiz/Tielemans, for a lot of last season plenty were worried about where our goal threat from midfield had disappeared to. They both played well together too with Tielemans higher up. Onana simply can't play that role so it's a net loss there. Onana for me was just poorly scouted and we way overpaid for him.I agree on Duran, he was impossible to manage so had to go. But the reality is our forward line last season was far stronger than it looks now. I think Emerys recruitment has been good rather than spectacular, Rogers obviously the stand out. But his main strength has been coaching, tactical instruction and man management in turning around a core of underperforming players. McGinn, Mings, Cash, Digne, Luiz, Tielemans (signed but he was in hibernation), Watkins. Id love to have seen how he could have really got JJ going this season.
Quote from: brontebilly on Today at 07:03:01 PMQuote from: LeonW on Today at 05:34:35 PMWe haven’t really been stung on the sales front. Targett, Grealish, Ings, Duran, Diaby, Luiz; I think we’ve won on all fronts and been smart. But this one could be different.Not sure about that at all. No matter what we sell players for, it's not worth all that much if the funds aren't reinvested to make the team better.Grealish - replaced by Ings, Bailey and Buendia. Frankly a disaster that cost Deano his job, still trying to get rid of two of the three of them.Luiz - yes Tielemans did a great job replacing his influence as our playmaker last season but Luiz was replaced in the squad by Onana, I'll be kind and say a dud thus far. Ings, yes and credit to Emery there. Hard decision but Watkins thrived immediately without him and Ings was done.Duran - big profit made on him but it's all relative. He was a ready made Watkins replacement and we are now more reliant on Ollie than ever.Diaby - maybe Malen will provide that direct pace option he brought, Rogers has stepped into the breach with more potential to be fair. Targett - was it Digne who replaced him? Fine I guess, cheers Stevie GI’m very much counting trading out as different to trading in although I would take the point that they directly correlate. But following that view, based on the above:• Grealish- you have to factor in the pure profit element. Plus, without doing the maths, I wonder how close it is on goals/assist from the 3 recruited players VS just Grealish. The wages also. • Tielemans was the Luiz replacement and that’s been an upgrade.• Ings was replaced with Duran. A better longer term prospect as evidenced by his progress and finally sale amount. • Duran was great business. I doubt anyone will get anywhere close to what we got during the rest of his career. His behaviour effectively forced our hand. With a bit more patience on his part, he could have legitimately been our number one striker by now. • Diaby - not quite sure who directly replaced him. Combination of Rodgers/Malen?• Targett replaced with Digne - massive upgrade.Don’t forget Philogene (“thinks that, I am on the one” -will get my coat).
Quote from: LeonW on Today at 05:34:35 PMWe haven’t really been stung on the sales front. Targett, Grealish, Ings, Duran, Diaby, Luiz; I think we’ve won on all fronts and been smart. But this one could be different.Not sure about that at all. No matter what we sell players for, it's not worth all that much if the funds aren't reinvested to make the team better.Grealish - replaced by Ings, Bailey and Buendia. Frankly a disaster that cost Deano his job, still trying to get rid of two of the three of them.Luiz - yes Tielemans did a great job replacing his influence as our playmaker last season but Luiz was replaced in the squad by Onana, I'll be kind and say a dud thus far. Ings, yes and credit to Emery there. Hard decision but Watkins thrived immediately without him and Ings was done.Duran - big profit made on him but it's all relative. He was a ready made Watkins replacement and we are now more reliant on Ollie than ever.Diaby - maybe Malen will provide that direct pace option he brought, Rogers has stepped into the breach with more potential to be fair. Targett - was it Digne who replaced him? Fine I guess, cheers Stevie G
We haven’t really been stung on the sales front. Targett, Grealish, Ings, Duran, Diaby, Luiz; I think we’ve won on all fronts and been smart. But this one could be different.
I'm. Not convinced that Ramsey will go on to be the world beater we thought he would. Then again, a new start might just give him the motivation. I don't think it was ever going to happen here.
Quote from: villa for life on Today at 08:13:59 PMDon’t get personal. Be civil and keep it to football.You are talking about football, the talk you do is wrong. I'm commenting that it is a wrong the same as Paulie. I haven't called YOU as a person anything.
That’s also personal and infers that whatever Tim says is not worthy.
You’re conflating some things though Bronte. What we did with Duran is very strong recruitment, you buy low and either have picked up a talent who could augment the team or you move them on for a huge profit. Our forward line being weaker currently, is about the constraints related to UEFA competition, specifically the one placed on us in respect of the “A” squad.
Quote from: villa for life on Today at 08:40:22 PMThat’s also personal and infers that whatever Tim says is not worthy.It isn’t.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on Today at 08:17:21 PMYou’re conflating some things though Bronte. What we did with Duran is very strong recruitment, you buy low and either have picked up a talent who could augment the team or you move them on for a huge profit. Our forward line being weaker currently, is about the constraints related to UEFA competition, specifically the one placed on us in respect of the “A” squad. Exactly this.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on Today at 08:46:06 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on Today at 08:17:21 PMYou’re conflating some things though Bronte. What we did with Duran is very strong recruitment, you buy low and either have picked up a talent who could augment the team or you move them on for a huge profit. Our forward line being weaker currently, is about the constraints related to UEFA competition, specifically the one placed on us in respect of the “A” squad. Exactly this.Totally. Duran and Rogers have been the bright spots of our recruitment in the last few seasons.
Spot on. Our recruitment the last few years has not been great, and changing this is our route to a brighter future. People ask how can we compete with the likes of Liverpool and city etc? Well, think of Bournemouth, Brighton , Palace , Brentford and forest who have had even less transfer budget and don’t /can’t pay the kind of wages we do. What must they be thinking?