collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Harvey Elliott by Ads
[Today at 01:59:01 PM]


Emi Martinez by Ads
[Today at 01:57:14 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Demitri_C
[Today at 01:56:31 PM]


Europa League 2025-26 by liam
[Today at 01:53:34 PM]


Jadon Sancho by Villatillidie25
[Today at 01:52:50 PM]


Ramón Rodríguez Verdejo (AKA Monchi) by Drummond
[Today at 01:48:06 PM]


Victor Lindelöf by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 01:29:23 PM]


FFP by Toronto Villa
[Today at 01:27:57 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Jacob Ramsey - Gone  (Read 436886 times)

Offline Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47799
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 16.09.2025
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2070 on: January 29, 2024, 09:56:12 AM »
Luiz would go before Ramsey if we were desperate for cash.

I'm not sure. I would have agreed with you at the start of the season, but I think Luiz is more integral to Emery's way of playing now.

He'd probably bring in close to double what Ramsey would though (hypothetical release-clauses for DL notwithstanding).

Although I agree that if we had to lose one of them, we'd choose Ramsey.

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31180
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2071 on: January 29, 2024, 09:57:56 AM »
Boro rejected £7.5 plus add ons for Rogers. Does strike me as a bit odd that Azaz was allowed to go there for £2.5m and we are being held to the for four Rogers. Not the best planning or negotiation.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30336
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2072 on: January 29, 2024, 10:01:06 AM »
Boro rejected £7.5 plus add ons for Rogers. Does strike me as a bit odd that Azaz was allowed to go there for £2.5m and we are being held to the for four Rogers. Not the best planning or negotiation.

It's because of the sell on fee for Man City I would have thought.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55511
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2073 on: January 29, 2024, 10:01:38 AM »
Luiz would go before Ramsey if we were desperate for cash.

I'm not sure. I would have agreed with you at the start of the season, but I think Luiz is more integral to Emery's way of playing now.

He'd probably bring in close to double what Ramsey would though (hypothetical release-clauses for DL notwithstanding).

Although I agree that if we had to lose one of them, we'd choose Ramsey.

We would and that point on the cost of Doug is relevant. We might not get offered the £100m + we might want for Doug, but if we say valued Ramsey at £50m or so we might get offered that.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37352
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2074 on: January 29, 2024, 10:03:09 AM »
Luiz would go before Ramsey if we were desperate for cash.

Ramsey is home grown so would be better for accounts being a youth player, and also is not as key to our team as he is nothing like he was last season before the (international duty) injury.

Not really. Luiz signed on a 4 year deal for about £17m so by the time he signed his new contract in 2022 he was 'worth' £4.25m. His new contract was 4 years again so since the summer he's had an amortised value of around £3.18m and it'll be slightly over £2m in the summer which is small enough to be insiginificant in terms of FFP.

Online frank black

  • Member
  • Posts: 3702
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2075 on: January 29, 2024, 10:04:23 AM »
Luiz would go before Ramsey if we were desperate for cash.

I'm not sure. I would have agreed with you at the start of the season, but I think Luiz is more integral to Emery's way of playing now.

He'd probably bring in close to double what Ramsey would though (hypothetical release-clauses for DL notwithstanding).

Although I agree that if we had to lose one of them, we'd choose Ramsey.

When we’re having conversations like this it’s a wonder why we’re even bothering.

Manager being forced to sell the best players to try and get a team together. I’d trust Unai to have a crack at it, but it must be a temptation to leave when the big opportunity happens.

Offline VillaTim

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12920
  • Location: The Co-op, Inveraray.
  • GM : 04.12.2025
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2076 on: January 29, 2024, 10:05:37 AM »
who says he's being "forced to sell" ?

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55511
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2077 on: January 29, 2024, 10:06:42 AM »
Luiz would go before Ramsey if we were desperate for cash.

I'm not sure. I would have agreed with you at the start of the season, but I think Luiz is more integral to Emery's way of playing now.

He'd probably bring in close to double what Ramsey would though (hypothetical release-clauses for DL notwithstanding).

Although I agree that if we had to lose one of them, we'd choose Ramsey.

When we’re having conversations like this it’s a wonder why we’re even bothering.

Manager being forced to sell the best players to try and get a team together. I’d trust Unai to have a crack at it, but it must be a temptation to leave when the big opportunity happens.

I don’t think it’ll be unique to us though. At least for now the rules have shown some teeth and clubs will be selling players they wouldn’t have wanted to previously. It’s bloody annoying and I don’t want us to sell, but other clubs will be having similar.

Offline Rigadon

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9090
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2078 on: January 29, 2024, 10:12:32 AM »
Luiz would go before Ramsey if we were desperate for cash.

I'm not sure. I would have agreed with you at the start of the season, but I think Luiz is more integral to Emery's way of playing now.

He'd probably bring in close to double what Ramsey would though (hypothetical release-clauses for DL notwithstanding).

Although I agree that if we had to lose one of them, we'd choose Ramsey.

When we’re having conversations like this it’s a wonder why we’re even bothering.


Indeed.  FFP is another modern day load of bollox (see also VAR) that hasn’t helped in the way it was (reportedly) intended. 

Offline chrisw1

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10095
  • GM : 21.08.2026
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2079 on: January 29, 2024, 10:13:40 AM »
From a purely playing perspective, I'd much rather keep Luiz than Ramsey.  As good as JJ can be, we just don't see it often enough and for me Luiz is probably our most important outfield player. 

But I could see a situation where we would lose Luiz in the next 2 years or so anyway, whereas I imagine JJ would be with us as long as we want him, assuming we're still at or around the top 6.

Either way, I'd be very surprised if we've left ourselves in a position where we need to sell a big player by June.  I'm sure we're tight on FFP, but not that tight. 

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2080 on: January 29, 2024, 10:14:20 AM »
It's a ridiculous situation. As an example, we could sell Ramsey for £50m and make that as instant profit. We could then buy a player for £50m on a five year contract (let's assume on identical wages), so the amortisation would be £10m a year. Selling Ramsey would then give us a big boost to profit that would help boost the FFP calculation for any given rolling three year spread with the year of sale in it, and it's only in later years that the £10m would hit.

The reality is though that we've got the same number of players earning the same amount of dosh, so what has forcing us to do this achieved in a financial sense? We haven't been any more financially sensible, we've just sold a youth player and bought another one.

Offline chrisw1

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10095
  • GM : 21.08.2026
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2081 on: January 29, 2024, 10:20:01 AM »
You're right Risso, FFP is ridiculous.  Its only saving grace is that without it with Newcastle we'd now effectively have two Man Cities now and no doubt Chelsea would be going again.  With clubs owned by nation states surely owners like ours would just give up.

I think I'd rather we try and claw our way up with a brilliant manager and sensible trading than watch Newcastle do a City.

Online SaddVillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 2415
  • Location: Saddleworth
  • 1000 ft up in the hills gazing down on Manchester
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2082 on: January 29, 2024, 10:20:08 AM »
David Ornstein reporting that Newcastle, Bayern and Spurs are interested in signing Ramsey but he'll probably be too expensive for any of them.

So probably not really news.

Ornstein's a London based rumour monger.

With the transfer window closing, lazy journos start trying to make DFP calculations and from that conjure transfer deals out of fresh air.

In the same article in The Athletic he mentioned Jhon Duran, Connor Gallagher and half of the Chelsea squad plus a few others names.

The only journos I pay any attention to are John Percy and Fab.

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35620
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2083 on: January 29, 2024, 10:20:44 AM »
For as much as it's a pain in the arse, it's also keeping a lid on Newcastle and to an extent Citeh which benefits us if we're very smart.

Online VILLA MOLE

  • Member
  • Posts: 8127
  • Age: 50
  • Location: STRATFORD UPON AVON
  • a v f c
Re: Jacob Ramsey
« Reply #2084 on: January 29, 2024, 10:22:06 AM »
At this rate Sky will have to do Repeats on Transfer deadline day .  a look back at the Golden Years

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal