Let’s start with the basics. You need a wicket keeper, not someone who is a good bat, hoping one day to be any good. Smith is not a Carey or a Foulkes - he’s a decent number 6 or 7, maybe even a number 3 now the Pope selection has so obviously failed. You need a spinner. Not a bloke who is ok as a Test number 8 and can turn his arm over. It has to be someone who can average better than 5.5 runs an over with the ball. I didn’t mind them trying the Bashir experiment but to take him … and then not use him on the friendliest of spin pitches so far - strange. An opener who can bat for more than 15 overs - only one is ok. I like Duckett and think he is a Test player - but Crawley? Really. Sibley or Jennings or someone who’s played grade cricket and knows the conditions … there must be some. Have a number 3 that you can rely on to stick around and blunt the attack - Pope might be a dashing 5 or 6 but not a 3. Bethell? Hasn’t got a first class 100 and spent last summer waiting to play IPL or some other short format stuff. No doubt a good player but let the county scene at least see him and see if they can work him out. County cricket - use it to develop Test players. Love it, cherish it, not treat it like some inconvenience between some non entity competition and the inconsequential 100. Anyway what do I know, a paying member of the public, when I can afford the crunching prices.
Unfortuantely so many of the concerns that people have had all along have played out in the most hideous fashion. Pope, Crawley - just not good enough. Cramming the team full of batters at the expense of specialist keeper and spinner has paid of as they havent delivered with the bat. Continuing to give away cheap wickets by swining the bats when it not the time or place. A pace attack that offers no control (Archer aside). Its a shame because it all feels so avoidable. Few expected us to win, but I was hoping it would at least be competitive. All a bit of a balls up.